Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:58:15.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF AN INSECT GROWTH REGULATOR WITH HIGH JUVENILE HORMONE ACTIVITY ON THE APTEROUS FORM OF THE POTATO APHID, MACROSIPHUM EUPHORBIAE (HEMIPTERA: APHIDIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. Benskin  and
J. M. Perron
J. Benskin
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Lava1 University, Quebec, Canada
J. M. Perron
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Lava1 University, Quebec, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a novel insect growth regulator (IGR) with juvenile hormone activity. Tests show the third instar to be the stage most sensitive to the regulator based on reduction of fecundity throughout inhibition of normal adult development. Effective control in most stages was for the first time brought about within the realm of economic feasibility. The IGR could be of value in future control of aphid populations.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 4 , April 1973 , pp. 619 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dadd, R. H. and Mittler, T. E.. 1966. Permanent culture of an aphid on a totally synthetic diet. Experientia 12: 832–833.Google Scholar
Dessureault, L. 1972 (unpub.). M.Sc. Thesis, Université Laval, Quebec.Google Scholar
Hangartner, W., Peyer, B., and Meir, W.. 1971. Effects of a juvenile hormone analogue on the apterous form of the bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scop. Meded. Fakult. Landv.-Wetensch. Gent 36: 866–873.Google Scholar
Law, J. H., Yuan, C., and Williams, C. M.. 1966. Synthesis of a material with high juvenile hormone activity. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 55: 576–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, A. D. 1961. Clonal polymorphism in aphids. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1: 68–79.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. 1966. The control of polymorphism in aphids. Adv. Insect Physiol. 3: 207–277.Google Scholar
MacGillivray, M. E. and Anderson, G. B.. 1964. The effect of photoperiod and temperature on the production of gamic and agamic forms in Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas). Can. J. Zool. 42: 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassar, S. and Staal, G. B.. 1971. A novel JH analog with high activity on the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Abstr. ent. Soc. Am., No. 423.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. and Krishnakumaran, A.. 1972. Relationship between morphogenetic activity and metabolic stability of insect juvenile hormone analogues. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 2019–2028.Google Scholar
White, D. F. 1968. Postnatal treatment of the cabbage aphid with a synthetic juvenile hormone. J. Insect Physiol. 14: 901–912.Google Scholar
White, D. F. and Lamb, K. P.. 1968. Effect of a synthetic juvenile hormone on adult cabbage aphids and their progeny. J. Insect Physiol. 14: 295–402.Google Scholar
Williams, C. M. 1967. Third-generation pesticides. Scient. Am. 217: 13–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed