Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:18:51.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Physical Factors on the Activity and Development of Adults and Larvae of the White Pine Weevil, Pissodes strobi (Peck)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. R. Sullivan
C. R. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Onrario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper presents the results of quantitative studies designed to determine, under field conditions, the influence of weather on the activity and development of adults and larvae of the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Peck). The investigation forms part of a general program to determine the physical and biological requirements of the insect, with the ultimate objective of assessing the role of the environmental complex in limiting weevil development and survival to particular stand conditions. The problem arose when it became apparent that this information was pertinent to studies designed to determine the effectiveness of applied silviculture in the control of the insect. In addition, it provided the opportunity of assessing the effectiveness of applying quantitative bioclimatic methods in the field.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 92 , Issue 10 , October 1960 , pp. 732 - 745
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Belyea, R. M., and Sullivan, C. R.. 1956. The white pine weevil: A review of current knowledge. For. Chron. 32: 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Green, G. W. 1955. Temperature relations of ant-lion larvae. (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Can. Entomologist 87: 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hussey, N. W. 1957. Effects of physical environment on the development of the pine looper, Bupalus piniarius. Rep. For. Res., For. Comm., London, pp. 111–128.Google Scholar
4.MacAloney, H. J. 1930. The white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi Peck). Its biology and control. N.Y. State Coll. For. Bull. 3: 5–87.Google Scholar
5.Pierce, W. D. 1916. A new interpretation of the relationships of temperature and humidity to insect development, J. Agr. Res. 5: 1183–1191.Google Scholar
6.Plummer, C. C., and Pillsbury, A. E.. 1929. The white pine weevil in New Hampshire. N.H. Exp. Sta. Bull. 247: 3–31.Google Scholar
7.Shelford, V. E. 1927. An experimental investigation of the relations of the codling moth to weather and climate. Bull. Ill. Nat. Hist. Survey 16: 307–440.Google Scholar
8.Sullivan, C. R. 1959. White pine weevil. Can. Dept. Agr., For. Biol. Div. Bi-Mon. Frog. Rep. 15(2).Google Scholar
9.Sullivan, C. R. 1959. The effect of light and temperature on the behaviour of adults of the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi Peck. Can. Entomologist 91: 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Wellington, W. G. 1950. Effects of radiation on the temperatures of insectan habitats. Sci. Agr. 30: 209–234.Google Scholar
11.Wellington, W. G. 1957. The synoptic approach to studies of insects and climate. Ann. Rev. Ent. 2: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar