Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:34:50.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BRUCHIDAE ASSOCIATED WITH MIMOSA WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. J. Bottimer
L. J. Bottimer
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One new species, Acanthoscelides tridenticulatus, is described from Mimosa strigillosa Torr. and Gray in Texas, and from specimens collected in Louisiana and Texas.Erroneous records of Bruchidae having been reared from native Mimosa in the United States are corrected. These are: Merobruchus julianus (Horn) (Not synonym Bruchus ochreolineatus Fall) from Acacia greggii Gray, Not Mimosa fragrans; Acanthoscelides chiricahuae (Fall), Not Bruchus schrankiae Horn, from M. borealis Gray; and A. distinguendus (Horn) from Rhynchosia americana (Mill.) Metz, NOTM. strigillosa. All of these constitute new host records.The following new host records are reported: Acanthoscelides chiricahuae (Fall) from Mimosa biuncifera Benth. in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and Coahuilla, Mexico; and from M. dysocarpa Benth. and M. grahamii Gray in Arizona, A. quadridentatus (Schaeffer) from M. pigra var. berlandieri (Gray) Turner and M. strigillosa in Texas, and from M. pigra var. pigra L. in Nicaragua and Panama. A. speciosus (Schaeffer) from M. malacophylla Gray in Texas, from M. biuncifera in Arizona, and from M. galeottii Benth. in Morelos, Mexico. Stator pruininus (Horn) from M. biuncifera in Texas and Mexico; and from M. dysocarpa in Arizona.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 11 , November 1969 , pp. 1186 - 1198
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bondar, G. 1936. Notas biologicas sobre Bruchideos observados no Brasil. Arch. Inst. bio!. Vegetal 3: 7–44.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. 1916. The genera of beetles of the family Bruchidae in America north of Mexico. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 36: 52–57.Google Scholar
Cushman, R. A. 1911. Notes on the host plants and parasites of some North American Bruchidae. J. econ. Ent. 4: 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1781. Species insectorum. Vol. 1. Kilonii.Google Scholar
Fall, H. C. 1910. Miscellaneous notes and descriptions of North American Coleoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 36: 89–197.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. D. 1968.(1967. Notes on the systematics, host plants, and bionomics of the bruchid genera Merobruchus and Stator. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 43: 264–271.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. D. 1969.(1968). The status of Bruchus distinguendus Horn. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 44: 279–285.Google Scholar
Kunhi Kannan, K. 1923. The function of the prothoracic plate in mylabrid (bruchid) larvae. Mysore St. Dep. Agric., Ent. Ser., Bull. 7.Google Scholar
Moreno, G., and Bibby, F. F.. 1943. Ynsectos del algodon y otros Malvaceae en las regiones de Matamoros, Tams, y del Valle Bajo del Rio Bravo, Texas — E. U. A. Fitofilo 2: 20–60, 62–110.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1907. New Bruchidae with notes on known species and list of species known to occur at Brownsville. Texas. and in the Huachuca Mountains, Arizona. Sci. Bull. Mus. Brooklyn Inst. Sci. 1: 291–306.Google Scholar
Standley, P. C. 1922. Trees and shrubs of Mexico. Contr. U.S. natn. Herb. 23: 171–515.Google Scholar
Turner, B. L. 1960. The legumes of Texas. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Vines, R. A. 1960. Trees, shrubs and woody vines of the southwest. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. H., Hunt, J., and Regan, E. P.. 1950. List of intercepted plant pests, 1948. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington.Google Scholar
Zacher, F. 1952. Die Nährpflanzen der samenkäfer. Z. angew. Ent. 33: 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar