Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:09:32.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPERMATOPHORE FORMATION AND SPERM TRANSFER IN THE DESERT LOCUST, SCHISTOCERCA GREGARIA (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. Pickford
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
D. E. Padgham
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, London, England

Abstract

Sperm transfer in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.), is accomplished by means of small (1.5 mm) spermatophores, formation of the first of which begins almost immediately after coupling. A normal copulation, which lasts 4 hours or longer, results in the production of about 6 spermatophores and a maximum of at least 14. Some details of the process of spermatophore formation are presented and differences among certain groups of acridoids are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boldyrev, B. T. 1915. Contributions à l'étude de la structure des spermatophores et des particuliarites de la copulation chez Locustodea et Gryllodea. Horae Soc. ent. Ross. 41: 1244.Google Scholar
Boldyrev, B. T. 1929. Spermatophore fertilization in the migratory locust (Locusta migratoria L.). Izv. prikl. Ent. Leningrad 4: 189218.Google Scholar
Dirsh, J. M. 1956. The phallic complex in Acridoidea (Orthoptera) in relation to taxonomy. Trans. Roy. ent. Soc. Lond. 108: 223356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, S. M. 1927. Studies in the copulation and oviposition of Anacridium aegyptium L. (Orthoptera:Acrididae). Trans. Roy. ent. Soc. Lond. 75: 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, G. E. 1965. The formation and fate of the spermatophore in the African migratory locust, Locusta migratoria migratorioides Reiche and Fairmaire. Trans. Roy. ent. Soc. Lond. 117: 3366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, R. 1970. Experimentelle und histologische Untersuchungen der Spermatophorenbildung bei der Feldheuschrecke Gomphocerus rufus L. (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Z. Morph. Tiere 68: 140176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter-Jones, P. 1961. Rearing and breeding locusts in the laboratory. Anti-Locust Research Centre, London. pp. 112.Google Scholar
Husain, M. A. and Mather, C. B.. 1946. Studies on Schistocerca gregaria Forsk. XII. Sexual life. Indian J. Ent. 7: 89101.Google Scholar
Kyl, G. 1938. A study of copulation and the formation of spermatophores in Melanoplus differentialis. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 45: 299308.Google Scholar
Loher, W. and Chandrashekaran, M. K.. 1970. Acoustical and sexual behaviour in the grasshopper Chimarocephala pacifica pacifica (Oedipodinae). Entomologia exp. appl. 13: 7184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickford, R. and Gillott, C.. 1971. Insemination in the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabr.). Can. J. Zool. 49: 15831588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, M. 1952. Analyse der Kopulationbereitschaft des Weibchens der Feldheuschrecke Euthystira brachyptera Ocsk. in ihrer Abhangigkeit vom Zustand des Geschlechtsapparat. Z. Tierpsychol. 9: 122154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. 1966. Grasshoppers and locusts. A handbook of general acridology. Vol 1. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar