Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:58:26.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Decision-Making Process and Insect Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. Hurtig
Affiliation:
Research Branch Executive, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario

Abstract

The decision-making process in insect control at the practical level involves not only the complex relationships between pests and their environment, but also equally complex human relationships and values. The actions advantageous to one of our resources may be harmful to another. Ultimately, the process of decision-making, at the individual problem level, must be integrated with economic factors, public health and sociological considerations. Calculated risks must be taken, but decision-making should he based on the evaluation of data bearing on efficiency, economy and safety of use of any method, including pesticides. Integrated control as a newly repopularized concept is examined in relation to the economics of its potential application in Canada. The concept of safety of pesticide residues in food is discussed and related to “good agricultural practices.” Three operative levels of decision-making are examined; the regulatory, quarantine and pest suppression activities and the role of the local advisory committees on pest control. The author expresses concern that the current public preoccupation with establishing safeguards for pesticide use does not begin and end merely with legislative action and strengthening of enforcement agencies. A desirable parallel result likely to be overlooked would be administrative and financial support for research on how the use of pesticides may be developed in the best interests of the community as a whole.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1963. Use of Pesticides. Report of the President's Science Advisory Committee, Washington D. C. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. 1951. Insect control by chemicals. John Wiley and Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormal, S., and H. Hurtig. 1962. Principles for the establishment of pesticide residue tolerances. Residue Rev. 1: 140151.Google Scholar
FAO. 1962. Report of the FAO Conference on Pesticides in Agriculture held in Rome 12-17 November 1962, FAO Meeting Report No. PL/1961/11, Rome, 1962.Google Scholar
FAO/WHO 1961. Report of a meeting of the FAO panel of experts on the use of pesticides held jointly with the WHO expert committee on pesticide residues on “principles governing consumer safety in relation to pesticide residues”, FAO Meeting Report PL/1961/11, Rome, 1961.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1959. The scientific principles of crop protection. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1960. Control of root maggots in swede turnips in Newfoundland with heptachlor and aldrin and the effect on parasites and overwintering pupae. J. econ. Ent. 53: 6567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1963. The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations Part V. Résumé and Appendices. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31: 311332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordish, G. 1962. Economics and pest control. World Rev. Pest Control 1: 3138.Google Scholar
Read, D. C. 1960. Effect of soil treatments of heptachlor and parathion on predators and parasites of root maggots affecting rutabagas in Prince Edward Island. J. econ. Ent. 53: 932935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. F. 1962. Integration of biological and chemical control. Introduction and Principles. Bull. ent. Soc. Amer. 8: 188189.Google Scholar
Wiesner, K. 1963. The structure, stereochemistry and absolute configuration of anhydroryanodine. Proc. XIXth. int. Congr. Chem., London (in press).Google Scholar