Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:01:43.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

8. Henry de la Legh and Nicholas de Cerne v. Ralph de Hengham, William de Brompton, and William de Saham; and, 8a, in connection, William de Saham v. John de Cave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Select Cases from Roll 541B
Information
Camden Third Series , Volume 9 , April 1906 , pp. 27 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 28 note 1 Wixamtree.

page 28 note 2 Tempsford.

page 28 note 3 Biggleswade.

page 28 note 4 Barford.

page 32 note 1 Basinghall.

page 33 note 1 Stratford at Bow, Cistercian abbey in Essex.

page 33 note 2 MS. convinctum.

page 35 note 1 MS. tracttatus.

page 37 note 1 The schedule is printed in the text at the end of this case (page 39).

page 37 note 2 Stat. Westminster II. (1285), cap. xviii., Statutes of the Realm i. 82.

page 39 note 1 The patent of Hengham's pardon is dated 11 Feb., 1291; Cal. Patent Rolls, Edward I., 1281–1292, p. 421.