No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2010
page 3 note * Scriptores post Bedam, fol. 1601, p. 153, 154.
page 3 note † Fol. 1691. Vol. i. p. 553.
page 3 note ‡ Vol. i. p. 554—571.
page 3 note § See his Preface, p. xxxviii. Thynne's transcript is in Cott. Vitellius, E. v.
page 4 note * No. 265 of the Manuscripts.
page 5 note * In my Dissertation on the period to which the earliest Roll in the series of the Pipe is to be referred, I have inadvertently stated that the name of every Bishop of the time occurs in it, except that of the Bishop.of Carlisle. But I now find that there is no notice of the Bishop of Bath and Wells; and the dispute between him and King Henry the First, which is, I believe, first brought to light in this narrative, may account for the absence of his name. The fact that there was this jealousy between the Bishop and the King, may, perhaps, be taken as some additional proof of the point which it is the aim of that Dissertation to establish.
page 6 note * See Catal. MSS. Angliæ et Hiberniæ, fol. 1697. ii. 179.