No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2009
118 Certification by Robert of Bassingbourn to Abbot Simon of Reading containing evidence from Pipe Roll 1 Richard I of the allocation of the abbot's liberty
[1213 x 26]
A f 34r
Robertas de Bassingeburn' misit literas istas Symoni abbati Rading(ensi) ad certificandum eum super articulis istis.
Robertas de Bassingebur' abbati Rading(ensi), et cetera. Quoniam perpendi vos nuper multum admirari et magnam ferentes angustiam eo quod libertas vestra non potuit inveniri in rotulis de scaccario, postea ad memoriam revocatus inveni libertatem vestram allocatam in primo rotulo regis Ricardi in hec verba. Idem vicecomes reddidit compotum suum de .xl. sol' de Johanne de Eston' quia non habuit quern pleg(iavit), et de dimidia marca de Johanne filio Galfr(edi) pro eodem, et de dimidia marca de Roberto filio Kane pro eodem, et de dimidia marca de Rad(ulfo) fabro pro eodem, et in perdonis per libertatem carte regis monachis de Rading(ia).
page 110 note 1 PR 1 Richard I (Rec. Comm., 1844), 26.Google Scholar
page 112 note a Ph' B (in error)
page 112 note b Insert dimid' m' B (in error)
page 112 note c Godefr' B (in error)
page 112 note d–d A f 34r (slightly different word order)
page 112 note e–e Om. in A
page 112 note f Boistard A
page 112 note g B adds in a later hand: in itinere W. de Raley in fine magni rotuli
page 112 note h-h A f 34r
page 112 note i concelamento A
page 112 note j Clive A
page 112 note k Om. in A
page 112 note l B has xxvii, but xxvi is correct (see note 3)
page 112 note 1 PR 1 Richard I, 26Google Scholar. The extract also appears in no. 118.
page 112 note 2 PR 2 Richard I, 33Google Scholar. Another version of this is in no. 119.
page 112 note 3 PR 26 Henry III, 66.Google Scholar
page 112 note 1 This immediately follows a quite unconnected mandate by Henry III concerning quittance of scutage in Showell (no. 528).
page 113 note a Interlined in A
page 113 note b A has Avia (in error), Diva B, C
page 113 note c Wlhavent' B, C
page 113 note d Wlavint' B, C
page 113 note e Scacc(ario) B, C
page 113 note f B, C end
page 114 note a Sic
page 117 note a This and the following item appear in reverse order in Ms and marked for transposition
page 117 note b Bracketed in Ms with next item
page 117 note c For this expansion, see the Eyre Roll for 1241, PRO JUST 1/37, m. 35d
page 117 note d Sic, probably error for pannis (see Eyre Roll, m. 35d)
page 117 note e Bracketed in Ms with next two items
page 117 note f Sic, probably error for disseis'
page 117 note g Interlined
page 120 note a Aldermanstone C
page 120 note 1 The printed text is slightly less extensive than that in the cartulary, for the latter includes quittance of tynpeni and the claims that the abbot's men are quit of assizes and recognitions and that the dogs of the abbot's men are quit of hambling.
page 121 note 1 The printed text is slightly different from that in the cartulary, for the latter, while omitting furcas, includes pillori and quittance of tynpeni and the abbot's claims to have free warren in all his lands and that his men are quit of assizes and recognitions. It concludes: Salvo iure domini regis cum inde loqui voluerit. See also no. 447.
page 121 note 2 The extreme right edge of the rubric was shaved when the folio was subsequently trimmed.
page 121 note 1 This text is the same as that in G, but slightly different from that in B, which may have been taken from another roll (see Crook, loc. cit.). The only significant difference in B, however, is that it calls the abbot's attorney Adam Scot, while G and the printed text have Andrew Scot. Cf. no. 558.
page 121 note 2 The extreme left edge of the rubric was shaved when the folio was subsequently trimmed.
page 122 note a Supplied from rubric
page 122 note b Supplied from rubric
page 123 note 1 Extreme right edge of rubric shaved by subsequent trimming of the folio.
page 124 note a Haleday C
page 124 note b Jeovene C
page 124 note c Om. in C
page 124 note d B has here predictarum deleted
page 124 note e Insert inde C (in error)
page 125 note a Monemuwe F
page 126 note 1 The only significant differences between the printed text and that in the cartularies are these:
For Abbat's de Hoctona (printed, para, 1, line 3) read Albodi de Hoctona
For Rogerum Vagel (para. 2, line 1) read Rogerum Vachel
After weyf (para. 2, line 7) add tanquam pertinentes ad terram suam predictam et cetera
The sentence Et de exitibus … Regi respondent (para. 7, lines 11–12) is omitted in the cartularies
The word alias (para. 9, line 16) is omitted in the cartularies.
page 128 note a Ms has .xl., but see no. 120 and PR 1 Richard I, 26
page 128 note 1 In the margin of f 139v, where this account begins, partially trimmed and possibly not complete.