Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:25:18.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Baby T

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

David A. Goldstein
David A. Goldstein
Affiliation:
Co-Director of the Pacific Center for Health Policy and Ethics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recent case of Baby Theresa has once again raised the dilemma of organ donation from anencephalic infants. Baby Theresa's distraught parents wanted to create something good from something tragic, by donating the baby's organs so that other children could live. If the physician waited for their baby to die naturally, the organs would not be suitable for transplantation. If they took them before death they could be harvested. For this reason, the parents petitioned the Florida courts to declare their baby dead at birth so the organs could be removed at an earlier, more propitious time. The court refused. The infant died, its vital organs unusable.

Type
Special Section: Organ Ethics
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Fall 1992 , pp. 345 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Shewmon, DA, Capron, AM, Peacock, WY, et al. . The use of anencephalic infants as organ sources. Journal of the American Medical Association 1989; 2161: 1773–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Walters, JW, Ashal, S. Organ prolongation in anaecephalic infants: ethics and medical issues. Hasting Center Report 1988; 18 (10/11): 19–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Shewmon, D. Caution in the definition and diagnosis of infant brain death. In: Thomasma, DC, Monagle, JF, eds. Medical Ethics: A Guide for Health Professionals. Rockville, Maryland: Aspen Systems Corp., 1987: 38–57.Google Scholar

4. Annas, GJ. From Canada with love: anencephalic newborns as organ donors?. Hastings Center Report 1987; 17(12): 36–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5. Capron, AM. Anencephalic donors: separate the dead from the dying. Hastings Center Report 1987; 17(02): 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Arras, JD, Sinnar, S. Anencephalic newborns as organ donors: a critique. Journal of the American Medical Association 1988; 259: 2284–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Fost, N. Organs from anencephalic infants: an idea whose time has not yet come. Hasting Center Report 1988; 18(10/11): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Counlter, DLN. Beyond Baby Doe: does infant transplantation justify euthanasia?. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps 1988; 13: 71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Fletcher, J. Indicators of humanhood: a tentative profile of man. Hasting Center Report 1972; 2(11): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Singer, P. Sancity of life or quality of life?. Pediatrics 1983; 72: 128–9.Google ScholarPubMed

11. Krauthammer, C. Baby Theresa stands firm on a frontier. Los Angeles Times 1992 04 6; B5.Google Scholar