Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:55:18.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tort Liability for Breaching Asset Freezing Injunctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2005

Get access

Extract

Where an asset freezing injunction is granted against a defendant in civil litigation it is usually essential to the enforceability of the order that it also binds any banks holding accounts to which the defendant is beneficially entitled. If the defendant, in breach of the injunction, disposes of assets subject to the order of the court, there may be few, if any, effective steps that can be taken against it. The defendant may not be amenable to the contempt jurisdiction of the court and may not fear being barred from defending the action (a suggestion of Lord Donaldson M.R. in Derby and Co. Ltd. v. Weldon (Nos. 3 and 4) [1991] Ch. 65, at 80-82). The ability to require the bank to preserve the defendant's assets is what really makes the injunction “stick’’.

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)