Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:40:15.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solicitor and Client—Privilege—Statutory Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

R. B. Cooke
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case and Comment
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 1954 , pp. 156 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 An identical question would not arise in England because the Commissioners of Inland Revenue have no correspondingly wide general power. But it is interesting that power to require particulars, in connection with the transfer of income abroad, from “any person” was given to the Special Commissioners by the Finance Act, 1937. An “explanation and amendment” of this provision was enacted in the Finance Act, 1939, s. 17, whereby a very limited duty of disclosure is prescribed for solicitors. Cf. Companies Act, 1948, s. 175.