No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2001
The Privy Council decision in Agnew v. Inland Revenue Commissioner [2001] B.C.C. 252 (on appeal from the New Zealand Court of Appeal in Re Brumark Investments Ltd.) decides that where a charge over the uncollected book debts of a company leaves the company free to collect and then to use the proceeds for its own benefit in the ordinary course of business, the charge is inevitably a floating charge and not a fixed charge, whatever the debenture might say. The court’s reason for this, in short, was that it makes no commercial sense to separate a book debt from its proceeds and so, if the company can use the proceeds at will, then the charge on the debt itself must be a floating charge.