Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:43:42.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DO WE NEED A HYBRID LAW OF CONTRACT? WHY HUGH COLLINS IS WRONG AND WHY IT MATTERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2004

John Gava
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide.
Get access

Abstract

INRegulating Contracts Hugh Collins takes up the challenge presented by 40 years of empirical studies which show that business people make little use of contract law in settling disputes, preferring instead to rely on trust and various non-legal sanctions to organise their transactions. Indeed, business parties often actively avoid the use of law because of its expense, inconvenience and tendency to harm business relationships. These findings pose a challenge to traditional doctrinal scholars. If business parties do not make much use of contract law, one has to ask what role it does play and whether the attention that is paid to it by orthodox legal scholars is misplaced. Regulating Contracts takes on this challenge directly and is the most substantial attempt made so far to explain the role of contract law in light of the questions raised as to its usefulness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)