Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:42:44.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Baby-Dry’ Case: The Modernisation of Trade Marks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2002

Jennifer Davis
Get access

Extract

When is a monopoly not a monopoly? Following the decision of the European Court of Justice in Case C-383/99 P Procter & Gamble v. Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (OHIM) [2002] E.T.M.R. 3, the answer appears to be when it is a registered trade mark.

Type
Case and Comment
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , 07 March 2002 , pp. 41 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)