Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:59:37.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Critics’ Count: Revisions of Dracula and the Postcolonial Irish Gothic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

Calvin W. Keogh
Calvin W. Keogh*
Affiliation:
Central European University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article revisits Irish criticism of the foundational period of postcolonial studies in view of its relevance to the topic of revisionism in contemporary postcolonial theory. Situating the status of Ireland and its literature in postcolonial studies, it suggests that the early distinction between academic “rereading” and creative “writing back” is a false one and that developments in Irish studies in the 1980s anticipate the more nuanced brands of contemporary postcolonialism. As a case in point, the article considers critical revisions of Irish Gothic fiction, which provided a context for various revisions conducted in the 1990s and early 2000s of the novel Dracula (1897) by Bram Stoker (1847–1912). It focuses on the “metrocolonial” concept introduced by Joseph Valente, which offers a means not only of connecting these revisions but of specifying the postcolonial status of Ireland and of relating revisionism to the revolutionary and reconciliatory strands of contemporary postcolonial theory.

Keywords

DraculaIrish GothicIrish studiesmetrocolonialmodernismpostcolonialismpostmodernismreconciliationrevisionismrevolution
Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , September 2014 , pp. 189 - 206
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Calvin W. Keogh attained a BA in English from University College, Dublin; an MA in English Language and Culture from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam; and an advanced MA in Literary Studies from Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven. He is currently a PhD candidate in Comparative Gender Studies at the Central European University, Budapest.

References

1 Howe, Stephen, Ireland and Empire: Colonial Legacies in Irish History and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar, 4.

2 Cleary, Joe, “Irish Studies, Colonial Questions: Locating Ireland in the Colonial World,” Outrageous Fortune: Capital and Culture in Modern Ireland (Dublin: Field Day Publications, 2006), 20–21Google Scholar.

3 Cleary, Joe, “Postcolonial Writing in Ireland,” The Cambridge History of Postcolonial Literature, Vol. I. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 539–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Cleary, 2006, 22.

5 Howe, 5, author’s emphasis.

6 Hooper, Glenn and Graham, Colin, Irish and Postcolonial Writing (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002)Google Scholar, 10.

7 Cleary, 2012, 542.

8 McCaw, Neil, “Introduction: Exploding the Canons?” Writing Irishness in Nineteenth-Century British Culture, ed. Neil McCaw (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004)Google Scholar, 6.

9 Ingelbien, Raphaël, “Irish Studies, the Postcolonial Paradigm and the Comparative Mandate,” Affecting Irishness: Negotiating Cultural Identity within and beyond the Nation, eds. James P. Byrne et al (Bern: Peter Lang, 2009)Google Scholar, 24.

10 Ashcroft, Bill, Griffiths, Gareth, and Tiffin, Helen, The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures, 2e (London and New York: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar, 2.

11 Ibid.

12 Ingelbien, 2009, 25.

13 Ibid., 29.

14 Quayson, Ato, Postcolonialism: Theory, Practice or Process? (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000)Google Scholar, 77.

15 Huggan, Graham, “General Introduction,” The Oxford Handbook of Postcolonial Studies, ed. Graham Huggan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 5, fn 1.

16 Deane, Seamus, “Heroic Styles: The Tradition of an Idea,” Ireland’s Field Day: Field Day Theatre Company (London: Hutchinson Education, 1985)Google Scholar, 58.

17 Ibid.

18 Cleary, 2006, 14.

19 Deane, Seamus, “Introduction,” Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature, Terry Eagleton, Fredric Jameson, and Edward W. Said (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1990)Google Scholar, 6.

20 Ibid., 3.

21 Ibid., 14.

22 Huggan, 4.

23 Ibid., 12.

24 Ibid., 10.

25 Ibid.

26 Ibid., 12.

27 Ibid., 10.

28 Huggan’s brand of postcolonial historical revisionism should not be confused with Irish historical revisionism.

29 Ibid., 5, fn. 1.

30 Deane, 1990, 7.

31 Ibid.

32 Ibid., 10.

33 Ibid., 11.

34 McCormack, W. J., “Irish Gothic and After (1820–1945): Introduction,” Field Day Anthology 2: 837Google Scholar.

35 Killeen, Jarlath, “Irish Gothic: A Theoretical Introduction,” Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies 1 (October 2006)Google Scholar.

36 Ibid.

37 Ibid.

38 Killeen, Jarleen, “Irish Gothic Revisited,” Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies 4 (June 2008)Google Scholar.

39 Killeen, 2006.

40 Killeen, Jarlath, Gothic Ireland: Horror and the Irish Anglican Imagination in the Long Eighteenth Century (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2005)Google Scholar, 17.

41 Huggan, 16.

42 Valente, Joseph, Dracula’s Crypt: Bram Stoker, Irishness, and the Question of Blood (Urbana and Chicago, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 2002)Google Scholar, 9.

43 Valente, Joseph, “Between Resistance and Complicity: Metro-Colonial Tactics in Joyce’s ‘Dubliners,’ ” Narrative: Michel de Certeau and Narrative Tactics 6.3 (October 1998): 325–340Google Scholar.

44 Valente, Joseph, “Double Born: Bram Stoker and the Metrocolonial Gothic,” MFS Modern Fiction Studies 46.3 (Fall 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 632; “The Colonial Conan Doyle: British Imperialism, Irish Nationalism and the Gothic (Review),” Victorian Studies 46.4 (Summer 2004): 694.

45 Huggan, 16.

46 Ibid., 15.

47 Killeen, 2005, 13.

48 McCormack, W. J., “Cashiering the Gothic Tradition,” Dissolute Characters: Irish Literary History through Balzac, Sheridan, Le Fanu, Yeats and Bowen (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993)Google Scholar, 3, 10.

49 McCormack, W. J., Burke to Beckett: Ascendancy, Tradition and Betrayal in Literary History (Cork: Cork University Press, 1994)Google Scholar, 12, author’s emphasis.

50 Killeen, 2008.

51 Bram Stoker, Dracula [1897], eds. Nina Auerbach and David J. Skal (London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997), 2.

52 Arata, Stephen D., “The Occidental Tourist: Dracula and the Anxiety of Reverse Colonisation,” Victorian Studies (Summer 1990)Google Scholar: 635.

53 Stoker, 2–3.

54 Ibid., 10.

55 Valente, 2002, 54.

56 Thomas Carlyle’s Reminiscences of My Irish Journey in 1849 (1882) characterizes Ireland in comparable terms.

57 Valente, 2002, 51.

58 Ingelbien, Raphaël, “Gothic Genealogies: Dracula, Bowen’s Court, and Anglo-Irish Psychology,” English Literary History 70.4 (Winter 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 1089.

59 Valente, , 2002, 55Google Scholar.

60 Stoker, , 21–22Google Scholar.

61 Ibid., 25.

62 Valente, , 2002, 63–64Google Scholar.

63 Stoker, 29.

64 Eagleton, Terry, Heathcliff and the Great Hunger: Studies in Irish Culture (London: Verso, 1995)Google Scholar, 215.

65 Gibbons, Luke, Gaelic Gothic: Race, Colonization, and Irish Culture (Galway: Arlen House, 2004)Google Scholar, 78.

66 Ibid.

67 Seed, David, “The Narrative Method of Dracula,” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 40.1 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 68.

68 Valente, , 2002, 59Google Scholar.

69 Ibid., 61.

70 Ibid.

71 Stoker, , 264Google Scholar.

72 Cf. Mary Jean Corbett, Allegories of Union in Irish and English Writing, 1790–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 84.

73 Lankester, E. Ray, Degeneration: A Chapter in Darwinism (London: Macmillan, 1880)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 62.

74 Gibbons, , 78Google Scholar.

75 Stoker, , 53–54Google Scholar.

76 Arata.

77 Gibbons, , 79Google Scholar.

78 Stewart, Bruce, “Bram Stoker’s Dracula: Possessed by the Spirit of the Nation?” Irish University Review 29 (1999): 238–255Google Scholar.

79 Qtd., Stewart, 247.

80 Valente, , 2002, 58Google Scholar.

81 Ingelbien, 2003, 1093.

82 Ibid.

83 Ibid.

84 Ibid., 1094.

85 Valente, , 2002, 3Google Scholar.

86 Ibid.

87 Ibid.

88 Ibid., 4.

89 Ibid.

90 Ibid., author’s emphasis.

91 Ibid., 55–59.

92 Ibid., 59.

93 Ibid., 3.

94 Ibid., 16.

95 Ibid., 8.

96 Huggan, , 19–20Google Scholar.

97 Theo D’haen, “(Post)Modernity and Caribbean Discourse,” A History of Literature in the Caribbean, Vol. 3: Cross-Cultural Studies, A. James Arnold, ed. (Amsterdam and Philadelphia, Penn.: John Benjamins, 1997), 305.

98 Ibid.

99 Huggan, , 19Google Scholar.

100 Killeen, 2005, 15.

101 Ibid.

102 Ibid.

103 Ibid., 17.

104 Morash, Christopher, “The Time is Out of Joint (O Curséd Spite!): Towards a Definition of a Supernatural Narrative,” That Other World, Bruce Stewart, ed. (Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe, 2003)Google Scholar, 138.

105 Cf. “Crew of Light.” Christopher Craft, “‘Kiss Me with Those Red Lips’: Gender and Inversion in Bram Stoker’s Dracula,” Representations 8, 1984, 130, fn. 7.

106 Wasson, Richard, “The Politics of Dracula,” English Literature in Transition 47, 1979, 229–237Google Scholar.

107 Killeen, , 2006Google Scholar.

108 Gikandi, Simon, Writing in Limbo: Modernism and Caribbean Culture (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, 1992)Google Scholar. Qtd. Theo D’haen, “Re-Presenting the Caribbean,” L’exil et l'allégorie dans le roman Anglophone contemporain, Michel Morel, ed. (Paris: Editions Messene, 1998), 103–15.

109 Hutcheon, Linda, “‘Circling the Downspout of Empire’: Post-Colonialism and Postmodernism,” ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature 20.4 (1989)Google Scholar: 151.

110 Valente, , 2002, 6Google Scholar.

111 Ibid., 21.

112 Stoker, , 106Google Scholar.

113 Hutcheon, , 171Google Scholar.

114 Ibid., 150.

115 Ibid., 171.

116 Valente, , 2002, 2Google Scholar.

117 Stoker, , 325Google Scholar.

118 Ibid.

119 Huggan, , 20–21Google Scholar.

120 Ibid., 4.

121 Valente, , 2002, 10–11Google Scholar.

122 Ibid., author’s emphasis.

123 Deane, , 1990, 3Google Scholar.

124 Huggan, , 17Google Scholar.

125 Ibid., 16.

126 Ibid., 20.

127 Ibid., author’s emphasis.

128 Valente, , 2002, 70Google Scholar.

129 Ibid., 19–20.

130 Field Day Anthology, 845–46.

131 Valente, , 2002, 5–6Google Scholar.

132 Stoker, , 54Google Scholar.