Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:10:19.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ‘PHOENICIAN LETTERS’ OF DICTYS OF CRETE AND DIONYSIUS SCYTOBRACHION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2012

Karen Ní Mheallaigh
Karen Ní Mheallaigh*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dictys of Crete's Journal of the Trojan War seems to invite the reader to imagine two different versions of the imaginary ancient Ur-text: one that was written in Phoenician language and script, and another that was written using ‘Phoenician letters’ but whose language was Greek. What is the meaning of the text's different fantasies of its own origins? And how is the reader to understand the puzzlingly implausible Punico-Greek text that is envisaged in Septimius' prefatory letter? This article examines first why the Journal's fantasy Ur-text changed as the Dictys-text itself evolved, and what the text's fiction of its own origins can tell us, not only about its readers' contemporary context, but also about their fantasies about their own literary past – and future as well. Secondly, comparison with the work of Dionysius Skytobrachion, himself the author of a pseudo-documentary Troy-history, offers a new interpretation of what, precisely, Septimius' ‘Punic letters’ may have represented in ancient readers' minds, and opens up a new (imaginary) literary hinterland in the heroic past for the fictional author Dictys and his text.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 58 , December 2012 , pp. 181 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works cited

Adams, J. N., Janse, M. and Swain, S. (eds.) (2002) Bilingualism in ancient society, Oxford.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. I. (1981) The ‘Phoenician History’ of Philo of Byblos. A commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar
Biville, F. (2002) ‘The Graeco-Romans and Graeco-Latin: a terminological framework for cases of bilingualism’, in Adams, Janse and Swain (2002), 78–102.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (2005) ‘Apuleius and Carthage’, Ancient Narrative 4, 1–29.Google Scholar
Corcella, A. (1986) ‘Dionisio Skytobrachion, i phoinikeia e l'alfabeto pelasgico: per una corretta interpretazione di Diodoro III.67.1 (FGrH 32 F 8)’, Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 120, 41–82.Google Scholar
Eisenhut, W. (1983) ‘Spätantike Troja-Erzählungen – mit einem Ausblick auf die mittelalterliche Troja-Literatur’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 18, 1–28.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1975) Utopias of the ancient world, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. (2007) ‘Apuleius, the Onos, and Rome’, in Paschalis, M. Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), The Greek and the Roman novel: parallel readings, Ancient Narrative Supplementum 8, Groningen, 263–76.Google Scholar
Gainsford, P. (2011) ‘Satire and the marginal text: Lucian parodies Diktys (VH 2.25–26)’, Hermes 139, 97–105.Google Scholar
Gainsford, P. (2012) ‘Diktys of Crete’, Cambridge Classical Journal 58, 58–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graverini, L. (2002) ‘Corinth, Rome, and Africa: a cultural background for the tale of the ass’, in Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Space in the ancient novel, Ancient Narrative Supplementum 1, Groningen, 58–77.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1957) Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker. Erster Teil. Genealogie und Mythographie. Kommentar, Leiden.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L. H. (1967) ‘“ΑΡΧΑΙΑ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΑ”: some ancient Greek views’, in Brice, W. C. (ed.) Europa: Studien zur Geschichte und Epigraphik des frühen Aegaeis. Festschrift für Ernst Grumach, Berlin, 152–66.Google Scholar
Kaimakis, D. (1976) Die Kyraniden, Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) Homer between history and fiction in imperial Greek literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (1973) Homer in der Zweiten Sophistik, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Marblestone, H. J. (1970) Dictys Cretensis. A study of the ‘Ephemeris Belli Troiani’ as a Cretan pseudepigraphon, Diss. Brandeis Univ.Google Scholar
Merkle, S. (1989) Die ‘Ephemeris belli Troiani’ des Diktys von Kreta, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2008) ‘Pseudo-documentarism and the limits of ancient fiction’, AJP 129 (3), 403–31.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1968) ‘Local cultures in the Roman Empire: Libyan, Punic and Latin in Roman Africa’, JRS 58, 126–34.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1993) The Roman Near East, 31 B.C.–A.D. 337, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. (2005) ‘Phrygian tales’, GRBS 45, 223–44.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. S. (1982) Dionysius Skytobrachion, Opladen.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire: language, classicism, and power in the Greek world AD 50–250, Oxford.Google Scholar
Troiani, L. (1974) L'opera storiografica di Filone da Byblos, Pisa.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1994) ‘ Ab ovo: Orpheus, Sanchuniathon and the origins of the Ionian world model’, CQ 44, 289–307.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (1998) ‘ The birth of a prodigy: Heliodorus and the genealogy of Hellenism ’, in Hunter, R. (ed.) Studies in Heliodorus, Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Vol. 21, Cambridge, 93–124.Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. (2002) Euhemeros von Messene. Leben, Werk und Nachwirkung, Münich.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1985) Auctor and actor. A narratological reading of Apuleius's Golden ass. Berkeley.Google Scholar