No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2018
page 6 note 1 Lehmann's supplement.
page 9 note 1 The notion that ‘this would appear to have been a show lotus which tourists came to see’ (Tyrrell–Purser) is moonshine.
page 9 note 2 Or ‘how far people would be satisfied that your action was necessary’.
page 11 note 1 Or Billienus. The spelling is doubtful.
page 11 note 2 For verna thus, cf. XI, 19, 2.
page 11 note 3 De Causa Serviliana, p. 16.
page 12 note 1 There is no reason to call the L. Bellienus of Sail. Iug. 104, 1 Google Scholar L. Annius Bellienus, as Broughton tentatively does ( Magistrates, 1, p. 556 Google Scholar).
page 13 note 1 I waste no time on Klebs' clearly erroneous opinion that this Demetrius was so called: RE, Bellienus, 7.
page 15 note 1 In Att. VII, 1, 3 Google Scholar they have been making Pompeio change places with Caesare for four centuries, to the detriment of the sense.
page 15 note 2 An inscription containing it is generally held to be a forgery: see RE, s.v. Aemilius, no. 30.