Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:10:27.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JUSTIFYING THE WORLD AS AN AESTHETIC PHENOMENON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

Stephen Halliwell
Stephen Halliwell*
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, UK
*
*[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article scrutinises one of the most challenging theses of Nietzsche's Birth of Tragedy, that only as an aesthetic phenomenon can existence and the world be (or appear to be) ‘justified’. Through a close examination of the work's frequently masked revaluation of a series of Greek sources of thinking, not least its ‘inversion’ of both the metaphysics and the aesthetics of Plato's Republic, the article shows how the thesis of aesthetic ‘justification’ is caught up in a tension between Apolline and Dionysian interpretations, the first entailing a quasi-Homeric sense that the Olympians justify human existence by living a transfigured form of it themselves, the second involving a tragic insight into reality as itself the creative work of a ‘world-artist’, the latter allusively associated by Nietzsche with the philosophy of Heraclitus.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 64 , December 2018 , pp. 91 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This is a revised version of a paper read to the Cambridge Philological Society on 16 March 2017. I am grateful to my colleague Dr Nicolas Wiater for advice on certain points in Nietzsche's German.

References

Works cited

KGB = Colli, G., Montinari, M. et al. (eds.) (1975–2004) Nietzsche Briefwechsel: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 24 vols., Berlin. [References are to volume, page and letter number.]Google Scholar
KGW = Colli, G., Montinari, M. et al. (eds.) (1967–) Nietzsche Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, c. 40 vols. (projected), Berlin. [References are to volume and page, with line numbers where appropriate.]Google Scholar
KSA = Colli, G. and Montinari, M. (eds.) (1988) Friedrich Nietzsche: Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe, 15 vols., 2nd edn, Munich. [References are to volume, page (with line numbers where appropriate), plus, for the notebooks, entry numbers in the form (e.g.) 19[55].]Google Scholar
Benne, C. (2005) Nietzsche und die historisch-kritische Philologie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bernays, J. (1850) ‘Heraklitische Studien’, RhM 7, 90–116.Google Scholar
Bernays, J. (1885) Gesammelte Abhandlungen, ed. Usener, H., 2 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar
Bishop, P. (ed.) (2004) Nietzsche and antiquity, Rochester NY.Google Scholar
Borsche, T. (1985) ‘Nietzsches Erfindung der Vorsokratiker’, in Simon, J. (ed.), Nietzsche und die philosophische Tradition, Würzburg, 62–87.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J. (1977) Griechische Kulturgeschichte, 4 vols., Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J. (1998) The Greeks and Greek civilization, ed. Murray, O., tr. Stern, S., London.Google Scholar
Burnham, D. and Jesinghausen, M. (2010) Nietzsche's The birth of tragedy: a reader's guide, London.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1999) ‘Culture and society in Plato's Republic’, The Tanner lectures on human values. Volume xx, Salt Lake City, 215–324.Google Scholar
Came, D. (2006) ‘The aesthetic justification of existence’, in Pearson, K. Ansell (ed.), A companion to Nietzsche, Malden, MA, 41–57.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (2000) Nietzsches Antike, 2nd edn, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, F. (2016) ‘Ideen und Leben: Platon in Nietzsches Geburt der Tragödie’, in Abbate, M. et al. (eds.), Selbstbewegung und Lebendigkeit: die Seele in Platons Spätwerk, Berlin, 284–98.Google Scholar
Else, G. (1965) The origin and early form of Greek tragedy, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. and Nehamas, A. (eds.) (2009) Friedrich Nietzsche: writings from the early notebooks, tr. Löb, L., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. (ed.) and Speirs, R. (tr.) (1999) Friedrich Nietzsche: The birth of tragedy and other writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. (1992) ‘Germany and the west 1830–1900’, in Dover, K. J. (ed.), Perceptions of the ancient Greeks, Oxford, 225–45.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002) The aesthetics of mimesis: ancient texts and modern problems, Princeton.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2003) ‘Nietzsche's “daimonic force” of tragedy and its ancient traces’, Arion 11, 103–23.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2008) Greek laughter: a study of cultural psychology from Homer to early Christianity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2014) ‘Greek gods and the archaic aesthetics of life’, in Emilsson, E. K. et al. (eds.), Paradeigmata: studies in honour of Øivind Andersen, Athens, 121–7.Google Scholar
Harloe, K. (2008) ‘Metaphysical and historical claims in The birth of tragedy’, in Dries, M. (ed.), Nietzsche on time and history, Berlin, 275–89.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1984) ‘Loss of self, suffering, violence: the modern view of Dionysus from Nietzsche to Girard’, HSCPh 88, 205–40.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (2005) ‘Nietzsche on Greek tragedy and the tragic’, in Gregory, J. (ed.), A companion to Greek tragedy, Malden, MA, 444–58.Google Scholar
Herington, J. (1985) Poetry into drama: early tragedy and the Greek poetic tradition, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. (1979) ‘Nietzsche's debt to Heraclitus’, in Bolgar, R. R. (ed.), Classical influences on Western thought AD 1650–1870, Cambridge, 339–48.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. K. and Heit, H. (eds.) (2014) Nietzsche as a scholar of antiquity, London.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1979) The art and thought of Heraclitus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. (tr. and ed.) (2000) Basic writings of Nietzsche, New York.Google Scholar
Konaris, M. D. (2016) The Greek gods in modern scholarship, Oxford.Google Scholar
Landfester, M. (1994) Friedrich Nietzsche Die Geburt der Tragödie: Schriften zu Literatur und Philosophie der Griechen, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Leiter, B. (forthcoming) ‘The truth is terrible’, Journal of Nietzsche Studies [preprint accessed online at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2099162].Google Scholar
Lenson, D. (1987) The birth of tragedy: a commentary, Boston.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2010) ‘The Wilamowitz–Nietzsche struggle: another new document and some further comments’, Nietzsche-Studien 15, 41–58.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. (1967) Heraclitus, ed. maior, Merida.Google Scholar
Miller, N. (ed.) (1975) Jean Paul Werke, 12 vols., Munich.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2009) ‘Nietzsche gegen Aristoteles mit Aristoteles’, in Vöhler, M. and Linck, D. (eds.), Grenzen der Katharsis in den modernen Künsten, Berlin, 51–62.Google Scholar
Müller, E. (2005) Die Griechen im Denken Nietzsches, Berlin.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (2007a) Only a promise of happiness: the place of beauty in a world of art, Princeton.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (2007b) ‘“Only in the contemplation of beauty is human life worth living”’, European Journal of Philosophy 15, 1–18.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1991) ‘The transfigurations of intoxication: Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Dionysus’, Arion 1, 75–111.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2000a) The invention of Dionysus: an essay on The birth of tragedy, Stanford.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2000b) Nietzsche and the philology of the future, Stanford.Google Scholar
Reibnitz, B. von (1992) Ein Kommentar zu Friedrich Nietzsche, “Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik” (Kap. 1–12), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Reschke, R. (2017) ‘“Die Welt ist ein Spiel des Zeus …”: Friedrich Nietzsches ästhetische Sicht auf Heraklit’, in Fantino, E. et al. (eds.), Heraklit im Kontext, Berlin, 485–506.Google Scholar
Šćepanović, S. (2015) ‘Heraclitus’ fragment B 52 DK re-examined’, Rhizomata 3, 26–46.Google Scholar
Schacht, R. (1983) Nietzsche, London.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (2012) Kommentar zu Nietzsches Die Geburt der Tragödie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1988) Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Volumes i–ii in Arthur Schopenhauers Werke in fünf Bänden, ed. Lütkehaus, L., Zurich.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. and Stern, J. P. (1983) Nietzsche on tragedy, rev. edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (tr. and ed.) (2000) Friedrich Nietzsche: The birth of tragedy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tanner, M. (ed.) and Whiteside, S. (tr.) (1993) Friedrich Nietzsche: The birth of tragedy, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1928) A commentary on Plato's Timaeus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ugolini, G. (2000) ‘Philologica’, in Ottmann, H. (ed.), Nietzsche-Handbuch: Leben, Werk, Wirkung, Stuttgart, 157–68.Google Scholar
Ugolini, G. (2002) ‘Nietzsche. La tragedia senza la Poetica’, in Lanza, D. (ed.), La poetica di Aristotele e la sua storia, Pisa, 9–29.Google Scholar
Ugolini, G. (2007) Guida alla lettura della Nascita della tragedia di Nietzsche, Rome.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1975) ‘Greek art and literature in Marx's aesthetics’, Arethusa 8, 119–44.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1976) ‘Nietzsche and Marx on Greek art and literature: case studies in reception’, Daedalus 105, 79–96.Google Scholar
Whitlock, G. (2006) Friedrich Nietzsche: the pre-Platonic philosophers, Urbana.Google Scholar
Wohlfart, G. (1991) “Also sprach Herakleitos”: Heraklits Fragment B 52 und Nietzsches Heraklit-Rezeption, Freiburg.Google Scholar
Young, J. (2013) The philosophy of tragedy from Plato to Žižek, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. (2012) ‘Die Klassische Philologie liest Nietzsche’, Internationales Jahrbuch für Hermeneutik 11, 65–80.Google Scholar