Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T16:41:14.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IDYLL 7 AND THE HYMN TO HERMES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2015

Elia R. Rudoni
Elia R. Rudoni*
Affiliation:
Columbia University, USA
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simichidas' self-presentation as a poet at Theocritus 7.37 is modelled on Apollo's self-presentation as a musician at Homeric Hymn to Hermes 450. Through this allusion, in his own Dichterweihe as a bucolic poet Simichidas hints at the invention of the bucolic genre by Hermes. The reference is crafted so as to point self-reflexively to its status as reference; in particular, the expression καὶ γὰρ ἐγώ (‘I too’) of line 37 functions as an intertextual signpost. If Simichidas is a literary projection of Theocritus, the allusion has important implications for our understanding of his self-positioning within the poetical tradition.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 61 , December 2015 , pp. 99 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Allen, T. W., Halliday, W. R and Sikes, E. E. (1936) The Homeric Hymns, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001) Speaking volumes: narrative and intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets, London.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1988) The well-read Muse: present and past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic poets, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, M. G. (2008) ‘Theocr. 7.47’, SemRom 11, 217–21.Google Scholar
Boucher, J.-P. (1965) Études sur Properce: problèmes d'inspiration et d'art, Paris.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1985) ‘Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll, Philetas and Longus’, CQ 35, 67–91.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1979) Tibullus: a Hellenistic poet at Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his critics, Princeton.Google Scholar
Càssola, F. (1975), Inni Omerici, Milano.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (2003) ‘Once upon a time on Cos: a banquet with Pan on the side in Theocritus’ Idyll 7’, HSCPh 101, 289–302.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986) The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Cozzoli, A.-T. (1996) ‘Aspetti intertestuali nelle polemiche letterarie degli antichi: da Pindaro a Persio’, QUCC 54, 7–36.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1971) Theocritus: select poems, London.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1988) ‘Das poetologische Programm des Simichidas: Theokrit, Id. 7, 37–41’, WJA 14, 87–91.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (1993) ‘Teocrito e la poesia bucolica’, in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L., Lanza, D. (edd.), Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica. Volume i.2, Rome, 145–95.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (2001) ‘Heroes, descendants of hemitheoi: the proemium of Theocritus 17 and Simonides 11 W2 ’, in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.), The new Simonides: contexts of praise and desire, Oxford, 232–42.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and innovation in Hellenistic poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2011) ‘The collection of the Homeric Hymns: from the seventh to the third Centuries BC’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.), The Homeric Hymns: interpretative essays, Oxford, 175–205.Google Scholar
Gershenson, D. E. (1961) ‘Studies in Theocritus’ pastoral Idylls’, PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. (1968) ‘Théocrite, Simichidas et les Thalysies’, AC 37, 491–533 [= G. Giangrande, Scripta minora Alexandrina i , Amsterdam 1980, 119–61].Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991) The poet's voice: essays on poetics and Greek literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. (1952) Theocritus, 2nd edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1981) Studies in the Hellenistic epyllion, Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1991) Theocritus’ pastoral analogies: the formation of a genre, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993) The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hatzikosta, S. (1982) A stylistic commentary on Teocritus’ Idyll vii , Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1980) ‘Riper than a pear: Parian invective in Theokritos’, ZPE 39, 7–27.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1987) ‘Generalising about Ovid’, Ramus 16, 4–31.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Horstmann, A. (1976) Ironie und Humor bei Theokrit, Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1998) The pipes of Pan: intertextuality and literary filiation in the pastoral tradition from Theocritus to Milton, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1996) Theocritus and the archaeology of Greek poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1999) Theocritus: a selection, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2003) ‘Reflecting on writing and culture: Theocritus and the style of cultural change’, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Written texts and the rise of literate culture in ancient Greece, Cambridge, 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Klooster, J. (2011) Poetry as window and mirror: Positioning the poet in Hellenistic poetry, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossaifi, C. (2008) ‘Érudition et humour dans les Idylles bucoliques de Théocrite’, AC 77, 41–59.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. (1983) ‘Geography and the literary tradition in Theocritus 7’, TAPhA 113, 201–20.Google Scholar
Kühn, J.-H. (1958) ‘Die Thalysien Theokrits (id. 7)’, Hermes 86, 40–79.Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. (1959) ‘Aux origines de l'Anthologie ii: les Thalysies de Théocrite’, RhM 102, 307–30.Google Scholar
Livrea, E. (2004) ‘Lycidas and Apollo in Theocritus’ Thalysia’, Eikasmos 15, 161–7.Google Scholar
Meillier, C. (1993) ‘Théocrite, Idylle vii et autour de l'Idylle vii: ambiguïtés et contradictions de l'autobiographique’, in Arrighetti, G., Montanari, F. (eds.), La componente autobiografica nella poesia greca e latina fra realtà e artificio Letterario, Pisa, 101–28.Google Scholar
Moscadi, A. (2007) ‘L'Idillio 7 di Teocrito: la doppia investitura’, Prometheus 33, 214–30.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Virgil: Georgics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nickau, K. (2002) ‘Der Name ‘Simichidas’ bei Theokrit’, Hermes 130, 389–403.Google Scholar
Palumbo Stracca, B. M. (1979) ‘L'ironia di Teocrito nella polemica letteraria delle Talisie’, BollClass 27, 69–78.Google Scholar
Payne, M. (2007) Theocritus and the invention of fiction, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1949) Callimachus. Volume i: Fragmenta, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of classical scholarship from the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Piacenza, N. (2010) ‘Come una rana contro i grilli: note in margine ad una metafora teocritea (Id. 7.37–42)’, Lexis 28, 369–76.Google Scholar
Plazenet, L. (1994) ‘Théocrite: Idylle 7’, AC 63, 77–108.Google Scholar
Ruggi, F. (2011) ‘Sull'identità di Licida (Theocr. Id. vii)’, Maia 63, 240–4.Google Scholar
Schwinge, E.-R. (1974) ‘Theokrits ‘Dichterweihe’ (Id. 7)’, Philologus 118, 40–58.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1974a) ‘Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll and Lykidas’, WS 8, 20–76.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1974b) ‘Simichidas’ modesty: Theocritus, Idyll 7.44’, AJPh 95, 128–36.Google Scholar
Seiler, M. A. (1997) Ποίησις ποιήσεως. alexandrinische Dichtung κατὰ λεπτόν in strukturaler und humanethologischer Deutung, Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Serrao, G. (1971) Problemi di poesia alessandrina i: studi su Teocrito, Roma.Google Scholar
Serrao, G. (1995) ‘All'origine della recusatio-excusatio: Teocrito e Callimaco’, Eikasmos 6, 141–52.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1953) The discovery of the mind: the Greek origins of European thought, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, K. (2002) Philitas of Cos, Leiden, Boston, Cologne.Google Scholar
Stanzel, K.-H. (1995) Liebende Hirten: Theokrits Bukolik und die alexandrinische Poesie, Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Tarditi, G. (1994) ‘Questioni di poetica nell'incontro tra Simichida e Licida (Theocr. Id. vii)’, in Storia, poesia e pensiero nel mondo antico: studi in onore di Marcello Gigante, Napoli, 601–5.Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2011) ‘The eagle's gaze in the opening of Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, AJPh 132, 581–613.Google Scholar
Van Groningen, B. A. (1959) ‘Quelques problèmes de la poésie bucolique grecque’, Mnemosyne 12, 24–53.Google Scholar
Vara, J. (1975) ‘Sobre la identidad de Simicidas y Licidas del Id. 7 de Teocrito’, Emerita 43, 133–8.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. (2013) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes, Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Weingarth, G. (1967) ‘Zu Theokrits 7. Idyll’, PhD thesis, Freiburg University.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (1971) ‘A theophany in Theocritus’, CQ 21, 137–45.Google Scholar
Zagagi, N. (1984) ‘Self-recognition in Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll’, Hermes 112, 427–38.Google Scholar