Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:18:36.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HORACE AS A PUBLIC POET: THE EVIDENCE OF ODES 3.6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2022

T. P. Wiseman*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Tony Woodman's commentary has provided a convincing explanation of the apparently contradictory message of Odes 3.6. If the closing stanza does indeed allow the corruption of Roman morals to be reversed, the poem is best understood as a contribution to the celebrations in February 28 BC of Imperator Caesar's vow to restore the temples that had been allowed to fall into neglect by the corrupt oligarchy defeated in the civil wars. The widely held belief that Horace's references to performance are all metaphorical is shown to be unjustified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Cambridge Philological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am very grateful to Tony Woodman and to the journal's referees for their comments on an earlier draft of this article. Translations are mine unless otherwise stated.

References

Works cited

Alston, R. (2015) Rome's revolution: death of the Republic and birth of the Empire, New York.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (2016) Democracy: a life, Oxford.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. (ed.) (1947) Inscriptiones Italiae. Volume xiii: Fasti et elogia, fasc. 1 : Fasti consulares et triumphales, Rome.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. (ed.) (1963) Inscriptiones Italiae. Volume xiii: Fasti et elogia, fasc. 2: Fasti anni Numani et Iuliani, Rome.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2017) Review of Wiseman (2015), Gnomon 89, 412–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1957) Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2018) Review of Wiseman (2015), CPh 113, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1974) The last generation of the Roman Republic, Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppie, L. (1983) Colonisation and veteran settlement in Italy 47–14 BC, London.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, performance, and authority in Augustan Rome, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2010) ‘Performance’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Roman studies, Oxford, 281–94.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (2009) Apollo, Augustus, and the poets, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. E. (1954) ‘Augustus and Britain: a fragment from Livy?’, AJPh 75, 175–83.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. (2004) A commentary on Horace: Odes, book iii, Oxford.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (2009) ‘Books and reading Latin Poetry’, in Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (eds.), Ancient literacies: the culture of reading in Greece and Rome, New York, 186229.Google Scholar
Rowe, G. (2021) ‘Luctatio civitatis: Augustus’ Res gestae, Tiberius’ accession, and the struggle over Augustus’ legacy’, in Le Doze, P. (ed.), Le costume de prince. Vivre et se conduire en souverain dans la Rome antique d'Auguste à Constantin, CEFR 587, Rome, 139–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, C. H. V. (1984) The Roman Imperial coinage, rev. edn. Volume i, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2011) Horace: Odes, book iv and Carmen saeculare, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1968) Tradition and originality in Roman poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2015) The Roman audience: classical literature as social history, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2013) ‘A note on Res Gestae 34.3’, ZPE 187, 154–5.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2020) ‘Horace's “Roman Odes”’, CJ 115, 276–82.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2022) Horace: Odes, book iii, Cambridge.Google Scholar