Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:17:35.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hiatus in Vergil and in Horace's Odes*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

John Trappes-Lomax
John Trappes-Lomax
Affiliation:
Bury St Edmunds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our discussion will be primarily concerned with hiatus and prosodic hiatus in Vergil; emendations will be proposed at E. 3.6; A. 4.235; 7.226; it will also be suggested that some of the hiatus-free readings to be found in Carolingian and later MSS deserve consideration. Emendations will also be proposed at Horace, Odes 1.28.24; 3.6.10. In order to evaluate Vergilian innovation and Vergilian influence, we will need to give some brief account both of his predecessors and of the other Augustan poets.

Vergil's immediate predecessors

Comedy of course has its own rules, and a full discussion would be irrelevant; however it will be seen that some aspects of comic versification can be used to illustrate later practice. The fragmentary Latin poets are also excluded; what little we have of them has been exposed not only to the ordinary accidents of transcription but also to accidental misquotation; it is thus hardly possible to draw any certain conclusions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 50 , 2004 , pp. 141 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, W. S. (1965) Vox latina, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1963) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber quartus (corrected reprint), Oxford.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1949) Lucretius De rerum natura (corrected reprint), Oxford.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1981) ‘The formation of the text of Vergil’, BICS 28, 13–29.Google Scholar
Cozzoli, U. (ed.) (1984–1991) Enciclopedia virgiliana, 6 vols., Rome.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos libri V1I–VIII, Oxford.Google Scholar
Geymonat, M. (1973) P. Vergili Maronis opera, Turin.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1969) ‘Catullus 3.16’, Phoenix 23, 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, J. (1890) ‘Horatiana’, CR 4, 154–6.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1991) Vergil Aeneid 10, Oxford.Google Scholar
Heyne, C. G. (1830–1833) Publius Vergilius Maro (4th. edn., ed. Wagner, G. P. E.), Leipzig.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2000) Vergil Aeneid 7: a commentary, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housman, A. E. (1972) The classical papers of A. E. Housman, eds. Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F. D. R., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lachmann, K. (1855) T. Lucretii Cari De rerum natura libri sex (2nd. edn.), Berlin.Google Scholar
Lee, G. (1990) Catullus: the complete poems, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (1999) Parthenius of Nicaea, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1922) Early Latin verse, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M (1978) Ciris, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mueller, L. (1861) De re metrica, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Müller, K. (1975) Lucretius: De rerum natura, Zurich.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1969) P. Vergili Maronis opera, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Vergil: Georgics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1984) ‘Some problems of text and interpretation in Horace, Odes 3.14’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4, ed. Francis Cairns, Liverpool, 105–19.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M and Hubbard, M. (1970) A commentary on Horace Odes book I, Oxford.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1957) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI (4th. edn.), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. (1935) Publi Vergili Maronis liber quartus, Harvard.Google Scholar
Platnauer, M. (1951) Latin elegiac verse, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. (1980) Horace: the odes, London.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, R. (1929) Codex Vergilianus qui Palatinus appellatur, Paris.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, R. (1930) P. Vergili Maronis opera, Rome.Google Scholar
Shipley, F. W. (1924) ‘Hiatus, elision, caesura in Virgil's hexameter’, TAPA 55, 137–58.Google Scholar
Siedow, A. (1911) De elisionis aphaeresis hiatus usu in hexametris latinis, Greifswald.Google Scholar
Trappes-Lomax, J. (2001) ‘Catullus 107’, Phoenix 55, 304–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmer, F. (1908) ‘Lexicalisches aus Horaz’, Archiv für lateinische Lexicographic 15, 30–3.Google Scholar
Wakefield, G. (1796) T. Lucretii Cari De rerum natura, London.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1963) Golden Latin artistry, Cambridge.Google Scholar