Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T00:09:10.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Roman Empire in Eastern and Western Historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2019

W. H. C. Frend
W. H. C. Frend*
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 14: New Series , 1968 , pp. 19 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 19 note 1 See on this theme H. Fuchs, Der geistige Widerstand gegen Rom (Leipzig, 1938).

Page 19 note 2 Ammianus Marcellinus xxi. 10. 8.

Page 19 note 3 Sozomen, Hist. Eccles. (ed. Bidez/Hansen), v. 15. 4 ff.

Page 19 note 4 Julian, Letter to Arsacius, High Priest of Galatia = Ep.22 and Sozomen, Hist. Eccl. v. 16.5 -15.

Page 20 note 1 The classic Statements of Greek historiography are to be found in Herodotus, Prologue, 9-10, and Thucydides 1. 22. In general R. G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (Oxford, 1940), eh. 1.

Page 20 note 2 For instance, the well-known third-century A.D. inscription from Mactar in Tunisia, CILviu. 11824, CILvi. 3. 17985 a from Rome, and the Igel Säule from near Trier.

Page 20 note 3 Passio Sanctorum Scillitanorum (ed. Knopf/Krüger), p. 6. ‘Speratus dixit: Ego imperium huius mundi non cognosco: sed magis illi Deo servio, quem nemo hominum vidit, nee videre his oculis potest.'

Page 20 note 4 Ep. ad Diognetum 6. 7.

Page 21 note 1 As he teils in Dialogue with Trypho 2 and / / Apol. 12.

Page 21 note 2 Hippolytus, cited in Palladius’ Lauslac History, 62.

Page 21 note 3 De Principiis iv. i. i from the Greek (translated in A.N.C.L.x, 276).

Page 21 note 4 Justin, I Apol. 44.

Page 21 note 5 Lactantius, Institutes vn. 15. 11 and 18. 1.

Page 21 note 6 Philo, Legatio ad Gaium (ed. E. M. Smallwood), 3.

Page 21 note 7 Polybius xxx. 11.

Page 21 note 8 II Macc. ix. 4-9.

Page 21 note 9 Josephus, Antiquities xvn. 6. 5.

Page 22 note 1 Acts xii. 23.

Page 22 note 2 Lactantius, De Mortibus P Persecutorum 33. Also, Orosius vm. 28. 13.

Page 22 note 3 IV Macc. xviii. 11-18.

Page 22 note 4 Clement iv. For this identification, K. Beyschlag, Clemens Romanus und der Frühkatholizismus (Tübingen, 1966), p. 131.

Page 22 note 5 For messianic hopes in the mid-second Century, Celsus in Origen, Contra Celsum 11. 29.

Page 22 note 6 Legatio ad Gaium 3—5.

Page 23 note 1 Ibid. 144.

Page 23 note 2 Cf. the view of Justin, / Apol. 46 and II Apol. 12-13 ar>d Clement of Alexandria, Stromateis 1. 5. 28.

Page 24 note 1 Tertullian, De Praescriptione 7, De Corona Militari 11 and De Idololatria 18.

Page 24 note 2 De Spectaculis 5: ‘saeculum Dei cst, saecularia autem diaboli'.

Page 24 note 3 Apol. 25. 12-17.

Page 24 note 4 Ibid. 21. 24.

Page 24 note 5 Ad Nationes I. 7.

Page 24 note 6 Apol. 32. 1.

Page 24 note 7 Ibid. 50. 16.

Page 25 note 1 Minucius Felix, Octavius, 25. 5.

Page 25 note 2 Ibid. 25. 5.

Page 25 note 3 Comment. in Daniel iv. 8. See R. A. Markus,’ The Roman Empire in early Christian Historiography', Downside Review (1963), pp. 340-53.

Page 25 note 4 Comment. in Daniel iv. 7. See also A. Santo Mazzarino, The End of the Ancient World (tr. G. Holmes, 1966), p. 40.

Page 25 note 5 Comment. in Daniel iv. 9; cf. De Antichristo 49.

Page 25 note 6 In Apocalypsim xi. 7 (Migne, Patrologia latina v, col. 335).

Page 25 note 7 Especially in Ad Demetrianum, written in 251.

Page 26 note 1 The best description of Lactantius’ philosophy of history is to be found in A. Moreau, Lactance, De la Mort des Persecuteurs (Sources chrétiens, 39), pp. 25 ff.

Page 26 note 2 Luke/Acts as an apology: see B. S. Easton, Early Christianity (London, 1955), pp. 41 ff.

Page 26 note 3 I Apol. 32. 3-4. See H. Chadwick, ‘Justin Martyr's Defence of Christianity', Bull, of the John Rylands Library, XLVII (March 1965), 275-97 (at p. 286).

Page 26 note 4 Melito cited by Eusebius, HEiv. 26. 7.

Page 27 note 1 Contra Celsum II. 30.

Page 27 note 2 Ibid. viii. 72.

Page 27 note 3 Ibid. 11. 79.

Page 27 note 4 Ibid. I. 1.

Page 27 note 5 Eusebius, Demonstr. Evangelica VII. 2.

Page 27 note 6 Ibid.

Page 28 note 1 Tricennial Oration 1. 6. See also H. Eger, ‘Kaiser und Kirche in der Geschichtestheologie Eusebs von Cäsarea', ZNTW,xxxvm (1939), 97-115 (especially pp. 114-15).

Page 28 note 2 Eusebius, HEx. 9. 6.

Page 28 note 3 Optatus, De Schismate Donatistarum m. 3.

Page 28 note 4 Gaudentius of Thamugadi cited by Augustine, Contra Gaudentium 1. 35. 45. See my article 'The Roman Empire in the Eyes of the Western Schismatics', Miscellanea Historiae Ecclesiasticae (Louvain, 1961), pp. 9-22.

Page 28 note 5 Augustine, Sermo 296. 7.

Page 28 note 6 Ibid. 296. 6. Also Ep. 137. 20 and De Civitate Dei 1. 1.

Page 29 note 1 De Civitate Dei v. 9. 10. See C. N. Cochrane, Christianity and Classical Culture (Oxford, 1944), p. 479.

Page 29 note 2 Ep. 137.

Page 29 note 3 De Civitate Dei v. 9-11.

Page 29 note 4 See A. Pincherle's art. ‘Da Ticonio a Sant'Agostino', Ricerche Religiöse, I (1925), 443-66.

Page 29 note 5 Augustine, De Civitate Dei xiv. 28. See N. H. Baynes,’ The Political Ideas of St Augustine's De Civitate Dei', Historical Association Pamphlet (1949).

Page 29 note 6 De Civitate Dei I. 24, and v. 12-13: ‘They who restrain baser lusts not by the power of the Holy Spirit…but by love of human praise are not indeed yet holy, but only less base.'

Page 29 note 7 De Civitate Dei m. 30. 3.

Page 30 note 1 In contrast to the Donatist contention that all kings were persecutors. Augustine, Contra Litteras Petiliani 11. 210-11, written a decade before the De Civitate. See Baynes, art. cit. pp. 12-13.

Page 30 note 2 De Civitate Dei v. 24-6.

Page 30 note 3 Orosius, Historia, Prologue 10.

Page 31 note 1 Ibid. II. 19. 4.

Page 31 note 2 Ibid. VI. 20.

Page 31 note 3 Ibid. VII.

Page 31 note 4 He attributes to Tiberius a plan rejected by the Senate of declaring Christ a god ('ut Christus deus haberetur’). Tertullian, Apol. v. 2 and xxi. 24 is probably his source for the story. 4 Historia vn. 28.

Page 31 note 5 Ibid. vn. 43. See H. J. Diesner,’ Orosius und Augustinus', Acta antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, xi, 1 (1963), 89-102.

Page 31 note 6 Ibid. vn. 43. 6.

Page 31 note 7 De Gubernatione Dei (ed. and tr. E. M. Sanford), 1. 2. He also praises ‘ even Greek philosophers' who went without luxuries and offered themselves to death for greed of glory rather than of wealth.

Page 32 note 1 De Gubernatione Dei, vm. 1.

Page 32 note 2 See S. Dill's view of Salvian in Roman Society in the Last Century of the Western Empire (London, 1919), pp. 319-22.

Page 32 note 3 Eccl. Hist. vm. 48.

Page 32 note 4 Ibid. Prologue to Bk v.