Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:47:23.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symbolism in the Early Palaeolithic: A Conceptual Odyssey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Andrew I. Duff ,
Geoffrey A. Clark  and
Thomas J. Chadderdon
Andrew I. Duff
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyArizona State UniversityTempe, AZ 85287-2402, U.S.A.
Geoffrey A. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyArizona State UniversityTempe, AZ 85287-2402, U.S.A.
Thomas J. Chadderdon
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyArizona State UniversityTempe, AZ 85287-2402, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Archaeologists have been naive to expect that symbolic behaviour can be inferred more or less directly from the characteristics of an archaeological record. This article examines various construals of symbolism and its relationship to signs, indexes and style that are derived from more fully axiomatized theories of cognition in psychology, anthropology, linguistics and primatology. The authors' intent is to develop a more adequate operational definition of symbolism, and to determine whether our more stringent criteria for inferring symbolic behaviour can be met in ‘pre-modern’ contexts. A review of the archaeopalaeontological record suggests that the roots of symbolism can be traced to the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic, but that evidence for a robust pattern documenting its presence is not found until the Upper Palaeolithic. It is argued that symbolism had adaptive significance, but that it probably developed in contexts distinct from those in which it is manifest today.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 1992 , pp. 211 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arens, W., 1979. The Man-Eating Myth: Anthropology and Anthropophagy. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O., Vandermeersch, B., Arensburg, B., Goldberg, P., Laville, H., Meignen, L., Rak, Y., Tchernov, E., & Tillier, A-M., 1986. New data concerning the origins of modern man in the Levant. Current Anthropology 27,63–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarik, R., 1992. Palaeoart and archaeological myths. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2, 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berdecio, S., & Nash, L.T., 1981. Chimpanzee Visual Communication. Facial, Gestural and Postural Expressive Movement in Young Captive Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University ARP No. 26Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1973. Interassemblage variability - the Mousterian and the ‘functional’ argument, in The Explanation of Culture Change ed. Renfrew, C.. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 227–54Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1981. Bowes: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1982. Comment on R. White ‘Rethinking the Middle/Upper Palaeolithic Transition’. Current Anthropology 23, 177–81Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1985. Human ancestors: changing views of their behavior. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4, 292–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1989. Styles of style. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8, 51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M., 1973. Belief systems, in Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, ed. Honigmann, J.. Chicago: Rand McNally, 509–77Google Scholar
Blanc, A.C., 1940. The fossil man of Circe's Mountain. Natural History 45, 280–7Google Scholar
Blanc, A.C., 1961. Some evidence for the ideologies of early man, in The Social Life of Early Man, ed. Washburn, S.L.. Chicago: Aldine, 119–36Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1961a. Typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paris: Institut de la Préhistoire de l'Université de Bordeaux, Memoire No. 1Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1961b. Mousterian cultures in France. Science 134, 803–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordes, F., 1965. The Old Stone Age. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Bordes, F., 1972. Du paléolithique moyen au paléolithique supérieur, continuité ou discontinuité?, in The Origin of Homo Sapiens ed. Bordes, F.. Paris: UNESCO, 211–18Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1973. On the chronology and contemporaneity of different palaeolithic cultures in France, in The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory ed. Renfrew, C.. London: Duckworth, 217–26Google Scholar
Brace, C.L., 1988. The Stages of Human Evolution: Human and Cultural Origins 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Braun, D.P., & Plog, S., 1982. Evolution of ‘tribal’ social networks: theory and prehistoric North American evidence. American Antiquity 47, 504–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, C., n.d. A unified middle-range theory of artifact design, in Style, Society and Person eds. Carr, C. & Neitzel, J.. Manuscript under review by Plenum Publishing Corporation, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, C., & Neitzel, J., (eds.) n.d. Style, Society and Person. Manuscript under review by Plenum Publishing Corporation, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, P.G., 1989. How different was Middle Palaeolithic subsistence? A zoo-archaeological perspective on the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition, in The Human Revolution eds. Mellars, P. & Stringer, C.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 321–37Google Scholar
Chase, P.G., 1991. Symbols and palaeolithic artefacts: style standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10, 193–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, P.G., & Dibble, H.L., 1987. Middle Palaeolithic symbolism: a review of current evidence and interpretations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6, 263–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, P.G., & Dibble, H.L., 1992. Scientific archaeology and the origins of symbolism: a reply to Bednarik. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2, 43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.A., 1989. Romancing the stones: biases, style and lithics at La Riera, in Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis eds. Henry, D. & Odell, G.Washington: AP3A No. 1, 27–50Google Scholar
Clark, G.A., (ed) 1991a. Perspectives on the Past: Theoretical Biases in Mediterranean Hunter-Gatherer Research. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.A., 1991b. A paradigm is like an onion: reflections on my biases, in Perspectives on the Past: Theoretical Biases in Mediterranean Hunter-Gatherer Research ed. Clark, G.A.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 79–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.A., 1992. Continuity or replacement? Putting modern human origins in an evolutionary context, in The Middle Palaeolithic: Adaptation, Behavior, and Variability eds. Dibble, H. & Mellars, P.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum, 183–205Google Scholar
Clark, G.A., & Lindly, J.M., 1988. The biocultural transition and the origins of modern humans in the Levant and western Asia. Paleorient 14, 159–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.A., & Lindly, J.M., 1989a. The case for continuity: observations on the biocultural transition in Europe and western Asia, in The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans eds. Mellars, P. & Stringer, C.B.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 626–76Google Scholar
Clark, G.A., & Lindly, J.M., 1989b. Modern human origins in the Levant and western Asia: the fossil and archaeological evidence. American Anthropologist 91, 962–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.A., & Lindly, J.M., 1991. Paradigms and palaeolithic research traditions. Current Anthropology 32, 577–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conkey, M.W., 1983. On the origins of palaeolithic art: a review and some critical thoughts, in The Mousterian Legacy ed. Trinkaus, E.. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 201–27Google Scholar
Conkey, M.W., 1985. Ritual communication, social elaboration, and the variable trajectories of palaeolithic culture, in Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers: The Emergence of Cultural Complexity eds. Price, T.D. & Brown, J.. New York: Academic Press, 299–324Google Scholar
Conkey, M.W., 1987. New approaches in the search for meaning? A review of research in palaeolithic art. Journal of Field Archaeology 14, 413–30Google Scholar
Conkey, M.W., & Hastorf, C., (eds) 1990. The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dart, R.A., 1957. The Osteodontokeratic Culture of Australopithecus Prometheus. Pretoria: Transvaal Museum Memoirs No. 10Google Scholar
Dart, R.A., 1959. Adventures with the Missing Link. London: Harish & HamiltonGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., & Noble, W., 1989. The archaeology of perception: traces of depiction and language. Current Anthropology 30,125–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R., 1983. European Economic Prehistory: A New Approach. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R., Rendell, H., & Hailwood, E., 1988. Early tool making in Asia: two-million-year old artefacts in Pakistan. Antiquity 62, 98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H.L., 1984. Interpreting typological variation of Middle Palaeolithic scrapers: function, style, or sequence of reduction. Journal of Field Archaeoloy 11, 431–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H.L., 1987. The interpretation of Middle Palaeolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52, 109–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H.L., 1988. Typological aspects of reduction and intensity of utilization of lithic resources in the French Mousterian, in The Upper Pleistocene of Western Eurasia eds. Dibble, H. & Montet, A-White.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum, 181–97Google Scholar
Dibble, H.L., & Chase, P.G., 1990. Comment on J.M. Lindly & G.A. Clark ‘Symbolism and Modern Cultural Origins’. Current Anthropology 31, 241–3Google Scholar
Foley, R.A., 1987. Hominid species and stone-tool assemblages: How are they related? Antiquity 61, 380–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L., 1978. Mousterian worked bone from Cueva Morín (Santander, Spain): a preliminary description, in Views of the Past ed. Freeman, L.. The Hague: Mouton, 29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargett, R.H., 1989. Grave shortcomings: the evidence for neandertal burial. Current Anthropology 30, 157–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, D., 1981. Taphonomy and paleoecology: a critical review of archaeology's sister disciplines, in Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol.4 ed. Schiffer, M.B.. New York: Academic Press, 365–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford-González, D., 1989. Modern analogues: developing an interpretive framework, in Bone Modification eds. Bonnichsen, R. & Orono, Sorg. M., ME: Center for the Study of the First Americans, University of Maine, 43–52Google Scholar
Gifford-González, D., 1991. Bones are not enough: analogues, knowledge, and interpretive strategies in zooarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10, 215–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Echegaray, J., 1988. Decorative patterns in the Mousterian of Cueva Morín in L'Homme de Néandertal, Vol. 5, La Pensée ed. Bar-Yosef, O.. ERAUL: Liège, 37–42Google Scholar
Goodenough, W.H., 1990. Evolution of the human capacity for beliefs. American Anthropologist 92, 597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N., 1985. A figurine from the Acheulian site of Berekhat Ram. Mitekufat Haeven 19, 7–12Google Scholar
Gowlett, J.A., 1986. Culture and conceptualization: the Oldowan-Acheulean gradient, in Stone Age Prehistory: Studies in Memory of Charles McBurney eds. Bailey, G.N. & Callow., P.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243–60Google Scholar
Grayson, D., 1988. Perspectives on the archaeology of the first Americans, in Americans Before Columbus: Ice-Age Origins ed. Carlisle., R.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Ethnology Monographs No. 12, 107–23Google Scholar
Harrold, F.B., 1980. A comparative analysis of Eurasian palaeolithic burials. World Archaeology 12, 195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1986. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Isaac, G., 1978. The food-sharing behavior of protohuman hominids. Scientific American 238, 90–106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaac, G., 1986. Foundation stones: early artefacts as indicators of activities and abilities, in Stone Age Prehistory: Studies in Memory of Charles McBurney eds. Bailey, G.N. & Callow, P.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221–42Google Scholar
Kuhn, S.L., 1990. A geometric index of reduction for unifacial stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 17, 583–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S.L., 1991. ‘Unpacking’ reduction: lithic raw material economy in the Mousterian of west-central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10, 76–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeMort, F., 1987. Incisions volontaires sur un arrière-crâne de Néandertalien de Marillac (Charente). Préhistoire de Poitou-Charentes: Problèmes actuels Actes du IIIe Congrès National des Sociétés Savantes, Poitiers, 1986. Paris: Editions du Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques, 151–6Google Scholar
Lieberman, P., 1989. The origins of some aspects of human language and cognition, in The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, eds. Mellars, P. & Stringer, C.B.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 391–414Google Scholar
Lindly, J.M., & Clark, G.A., 1990. Symbolism and modern human origins. Current Anthropology 31, 233–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1988. The Neanderthals and the human capacity for symbolic thought: cognitive and problem-solving aspects of the Mousterian symbol, in L'Homme de Néandertal, Vol. 5, La Pensée ed. Bar-Yosef., O.ERAUL: Liège, 57–91Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1989. Evolution of the human capacity: the symbolic evidence. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 32, 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1991. The Taï plaque and calendrical notation in the Upper Palaeolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 25–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, F., 1986. Les Sépultures Préhistoriques. Paris: Editions du C.N.R.SGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P., 1989. Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology 30, 349–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P., 1991. Cognitive changes and the emergence of modern humans in Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, W., & Davidson, I., 1991. The evolutionary emergence of modern human behaviour: language and its archaeology. Man 26, 223–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otte, M., & Keeley, L.H., 1990. The impact of regionalism on palaeolithic studies. Current Anthropology 31, 577–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C., 1878. How to make our ideas clear, in Charles S. Peirce: Essays in the Philosophy of Science ed. Thomas., V.New York: Liberal Arts, 31–56Google Scholar
Peirce, C., 1896. Lessons from the history of science, in Charles S. Peirce: Essays in the Philosophy of Science ed. Thomas, V.. New York: Liberal Arts, 195234Google Scholar
Peirce, C., 1978. Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs, in The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings ed. Buchler, J.. New York: AMS Press, 98119Google Scholar
Piaget, J., 1960. The Psychology of Intelligence (trans. M. Piercy D. Berlyne). Totowa, NY: Littlefield, Adams Co.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., 1970a. Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., 1970b. Structuralism (trans. C. Maschler). New York: HarperGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B., 1967. The Childs Conception of Space (trans. F. Langlon J. Lanzer). New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Plog, S., 1976. Measurement of prehistoric interaction between communities, in The Early Mesoamerican Village ed. Flannery, K.V.. New York: Academic Press, 25572Google Scholar
Plog, S., 1980. Stylistic Variation in Prehistoric Ceramics: Design Analysis in the American Southwest. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plog, S., 1990. Sociopolitical implications of stylistic variation in the American Southwest, in The Uses of Style in Archaeology, eds. Conkey, M., & Hastorf, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6172Google Scholar
Rappaport, R.A., 1979. The obvious aspects of ritual, in Ecology, Meaning, and Religion. Richmond, CA.: North Atlantic Books, 173221Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1987. An interview with Lewis Binford. Current Anthropology 28, 68394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1991. Before Babel: speculations on the origins of linguistic diversity. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolland, N., & Dibble, H.L., 1990. A new synthesis of Middle Palaeolithic assemblage variability. American Antiquity 55, 48099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, M.D., & LeMort, F., 1986. Cutmarks on the Engis 2 calvaria? American journal of Physical Anthropology 69, 31723CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, J.R., 1977. The meaning of style in archaeology: a general model. American Antiquity 42, 36980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, J.R., 1981. From De Mortillet to Bordes: a century of French palaeolithic research, in Towards a History of Archaeology, ed. Daniel, G.. London: Thames Hudson, 8599Google Scholar
Sackett, J.R., 1982. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1, 59112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, J.R., 1986. Isochrestism and style: a clarification. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5, 26677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, J.R., 1990. Style and ethnicity in archaeology: the case for isochrestism, in The Uses of Style in Archaeology, eds. Conkey, M., & Hastorf, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3243Google Scholar
Sackett, J.R., 1991. Straight archaeology French style: the phylogenetic paradigm in historic perspective, in Perspectives on the Past: Theoretical Biases in Mediterranean HunterGatherer Research ed. Clark, G.A.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 10940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergi, S., 1939. Crania Neandertaliano del Monte Circeo. Roma: Rendicotti della Real Academia Nazionale de Lincei 29Google Scholar
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C., 1987. Reconstructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C., 1988. Social Archaeology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico PressGoogle Scholar
Simons, E.L., 1989. Human origins. Science 245, 134350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steadman, L., & Merbs, C., 1982. Kuru and cannibalism. American Anthropologist 84, 61127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiner, M.C., 1991. The faunal remains from Grotta Guattari: a taphonomic perspective. Current Anthropology 32, 10317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, L.G., 1987. Paradigm lost? A personal view of the current state of Upper Palaeolithic research. Helinium 27, 15771Google Scholar
Toth, N., 1985. The Oldowan reassessed: a closer look at early stone artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12, 10120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinkaus, E., 1982. Evolutionary continuity among archaic Homo sapiens, in The Transition from Lower to Middle Palaeolithic and the Origin of Modern Man, ed. Ronen, A.. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 30114Google Scholar
Valladas, H., Joron, J.L., Valladas, G., Arensburg, B., BarYosef, O., BelferCohen, A., Goldberg, P., Laville, H., Meignen, L., Rak, Y., Tchernov, E., Tillier, A-M., & Vandermeersch, B., 1987. Thermoluminescence dates for the Neanderthal burial site at Kebara (Mount Carmel), Israel. Nature 330, 15960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whallon, R., 1989. Elements of cultural change in the later Palaeolithic, in The Human Revolution: Biological and Behavioural Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, eds. Mellars, P., & Stringer, C.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 43354Google Scholar
White, R., 1989. Production complexity and standardization in early Aurignacian bead and pendant manufacture: evolutionary implications, in The Human Revolution: Biological and Behavioural Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, eds. Mellars, P., & Stringer, C.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 36690Google Scholar
White, T.D., 1986. Cut marks on the Bodo cranium: a case of prehistoric defleshing. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 69, 5039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T.D., & Toth, N., 1991. The question of ritual cannibalism at Grotta Guattari. Current Anthropology 32, 11824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1983. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48, 25376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1984. Reconsidering the behavioral basis for style: a case study among the Kalahari San. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3, 190234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmsen, E., 1973. Interaction, spacing behavior, and the organization of hunting bands. Journal of Anthropological Research 29, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wobst, H.M., 1976. Locational relationships in palaeolithic society. Journal of Human Evolution 5, 49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wobst, H. M., 1977. Stylistic behavior and information exchange, in For the Director: Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, ed. Cleland, C. E.. Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers No. 61. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 317–42Google Scholar
Wolpoff, M.H., 1980. Paleoanthropology. Knopf: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., 1979. The intelligence of later Acheulean hominids. Man 14, 371–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., 1981. The intelligence of Oldowan hominids. Journal of Human Evolution 10, 529–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., 1985. Piaget, stone tools and the evolution of human intelligence. World Archaeology 17, 32–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynn, T., 1989. The Evolution of Spatial Competence. Illinois Studies in Anthropology 17. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., 1991. Tools, grammar and the archaeology of cognition. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar