Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:54:03.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeological Perspectives on Scott's Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States

Review products

James C.Scott, Against the Grain: A deep history of the earliest states, 2017. London/New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-18291-0, $26.00, xvii + 312 pp., 13 figures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

Thomas P. Leppard*
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyFlorida State UniversityJohnson Building 2035 E. Paul Dirac Drive Tallahassee, FL 32310USA Email: [email protected]

Extract

James C. Scott's Against the Grain has immense relevance for how archaeologists view the dynamics of early states and complex polities. In this volume, Scott—already established as a leading theorist of states and statecraft (e.g. Scott 1997; 2009)—brings his analytic power and capacity to turn a phrase to bear on the topic of the ‘earliest states’.

Type
Review Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanton, R.E. & Fargher, L.F., 2016. How Humans Cooperate: Confronting the challenges of collective action. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E., 2011. Triumph of the City. London/New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C., 1997. Seeing Like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. London/New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C., 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. London/New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yoffee, N., 2016. The power of infrastructures: a counternarrative and a speculation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23(4), 1053–65.Google Scholar