Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:36:53.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Cognitive Archaeology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Viewpoint
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 247 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andagoya, P., 1865. Narrative of the Proceedings of the Pedrarias Davila in the Provinces of Tierra Firme or Castilla del Oro, and the Discovery of the South Sea and the Coasts of Peru and Nicaragua, trans. Markham, C.R.. (Hakluyt Society 34.) London: Hakluyt Society.Google Scholar
Barkow, J.H., L., Cosmides & Tooby, J. (eds.), 1992. The Adapted Mind. Oxford & New York (NY): Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J., in press. Fragments in Antiquity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bell, J., 1992. On capturing agency in theories about prehistory, in Representations in Archaeology, eds. Gardin, J-C. & Peebles, C.S.. Bloomington & Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press, 30–55.Google Scholar
Bender, B., 1992. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man 27, 735–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, B., in press. Stonehenge — appropriation and contestation, in Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, ed. B., Bender. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1962. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28, 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1987. Data, relativism and archaeological science. Man 22, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R. & Binford, S.R. (eds.), 1968. New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Bintliff, J., 1991. Post-modernism, rhetoric and scholasticism at TAG: the current state of British archaeological theory. Antiquity 1965, 274–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M., 1991. Language, anthropology and cognitive science. Man 26, 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M., 1993 (in press). Questions not to ask concerning Malagasy carvings, in Interpretive Archaeologies, ed. A., Alexandri. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1973. The Berber house, in Rules and Meanings, ed. M., Douglas. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 98–110.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 1989. Deaths and entrances: a contextual analysis of megalithic art. Current Anthropology 30, 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, J., 1993. Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, D.E., 1991. Human Universals. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J., 1986. Actual Minds; Possible Worlds. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, P., 1990. Historians, anthropologists, and symbols, in Culture through Time, ed. E., Ohnuki-Tierney. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 268–83.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1944. An Essay on Man. New Haven (NJ): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J., 1987. L'apparition des premières divinités. La Recherche 194, 1472–80.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C., 1992. Grammars of archaeological design, in Representations in Archaeology, eds. Gardin, J-C. & Peebles, C.S.. Bloomington & Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press, 251–76.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G., 1946. The Idea of History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A.C., 1989. Connections to the World. New York (NY): Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Donald, M., 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, A.J., Clark, G.A. & Chadderdon, T.J., 1992. Symbolism in the early Paleolithic: a conceptual odyssey. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2(2), 211–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, G.M., 1992. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matters of the Mind. New York (NY): Basic Books.Google Scholar
Eggert, M.K.H., 1977. Prehistoric archaeology and the problems of ethno-cognition. Anthropos 72, 242–55.Google Scholar
Elias, N., 1978. What is Sociology? New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Espinosa, G. de, 1864. Relación hecha por Gaspar de Espinosa, Alcalde Mayor de Castilla del Oro, dada a Pedrarias de Avila …, in Colección de Documentos del Archivo de Indias, Tomo II. Madrid: Imprenta Españnola, 467–522.Google Scholar
Espinosa, G. de, 1873. Relación e proceso quel Lie. Gaspar Despinosa, Alcalde mayor, hizo en el viaje …, in Colección de Documentos Inéditos del Archivo de Indias, Tomo XX. Madrid: Imprenta del Hospicio, 5–119.Google Scholar
Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés, G., 1851–1855. Historia general y natural de Las Indias, Islas y Tierra Firme del Mar Océano. 4 vols. Madrid: Imprenta de la Real Academia de la Historia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K.V., 1976. Contextual analysis of ritual paraphernalia from formative Oaxaca, in The Early Mesoamerican Village, ed. K.V., Flannery. New York (NY): Academic Press, 333–45.Google Scholar
Flannery, K.V. & Marcus, J., 1976. Formative Oaxaca and the Zapotec cosmos. American Scientist 64, 374–83.Google Scholar
Flannery, K.V. & Marcus, J. (eds.), 1983. The Cloud People, Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec Civilizations. New York (NY) & San Diego (CA): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., 1979. System, Structure and Contradiction: The Evolution of ‘Asiatic’ Social Formations. (Social Studies in Oceania and South East Asia 2.) Copenhagen: The National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Gardin, J.-C, 1991. Le Calcul et la Raison: Essais sur la Formalisation du Discours Savant. Paris: Éditions de l'École des hautes études en sciences sociales.Google Scholar
Gardin, J.-C, 1992. Semiotic trends in archaeology, in Representations in Archaeology, eds. Gardin, J-C. & Peebles, C.S.. Bloomington & Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press, 87–104.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., 1983. Frames of Mind. New York (NY): Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., 1993. Multiple Intelligences. New York (NY): Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M.S., 1985. The Social Brain: Discovering the Networks of the Mind. New York (NY): Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M.S., 1992. Nature's Mind. New York (NY): Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gellner, E., 1992. Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giere, R.N., 1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, M., 1979. The cognitive basis of productivity in a decorative art style, in Ethnoarchaeology, ed. C., Kramer. New York (NY): Columbia University Press, 75–101.Google Scholar
Hastorf, C.A. & Johannessen, S., 1993. Pre-Hispanic political change and the role of maize in the Central Andes of Peru. American Anthropologist 95, 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C., 1954. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist 56(1), 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, W. & Hanson, J., 1985. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, R.A., 1991. A biologist looks at anthropology. Man 26, 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1989. This is not an article about material culture as text. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8, 250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1991. Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity 56, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1992. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hughes, J.D., 1975. Ecology in Ancient Civilizations. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N., 1986. The Inner Eye. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N., 1992. A History of the Mind. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, F., 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Jennings, J.D., 1968. Prehistory of North America. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchler, S., in press. Landscape, memory and rights to land in northern New Ireland, in Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, ed. B., Bender. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Lake, M., 1992. Evolving thought. Cambridge Archaeological journal 2(2), 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Las Casas, B. de, 1951. Historia de las Indias. 3 vols. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1986. Mixing humans and non-humans together: the sociology of a door closer. Social Problems 35, 298–310.Google Scholar
Leach, E.R., 1954. Political Systems of Highland Burma. London: G. Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
Lemonnier, P., 1986. The study of material culture today: towards an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5, 147–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linares, O.F., 1977. Ecology and the Arts in Ancient Panama: On the Development of Social Rank and Symbolism in the Central Provinces. (Studies in Pre-Columbian Art & Archaeology 17.) Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S.K., 1937. Coclé: An Archaeological Study of Central Panama. Part I. (Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University VII.) Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S.K., 1942. Coclé: An Archaeological Study of Central Panama. Part II. (Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University VIII.) Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F., 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, J., 1978. Archaeology and religion: a comparison of the Zapotec and Maya. World Archaeology 10, 172–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, J., 1989. Zapotec chiefdoms and the nature of formative religions, in Regional Perspectives on the Olmec, eds. Sharer, R.J. & Grove, D.C.. (School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–97.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. & Flannery, K.V., in press. Zapotec ritual and religion: an application of the direct historical approach, in The Ancient Mind, eds. Renfrew, C. & Zubrow, E.B.W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshak, A., 1972. Cognitive aspects of Upper Palaeolithic engraving. Current Anthropology 13, 445–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S., 1990. Thoughtful Foragers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morphy, H., in press. Parallel constructions? The politics of landscape in northern Australia, in Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, ed. B., Bender. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Naipaul, V.S., 1987. The Enigma of Arrival. Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Olwig, K., 1989. Nature interpretation: a threat to the countryside, in Heritage Interpretation. Vol. 1 The Natural and the Built Environment, ed. D., Uzzell. London: Belhaven Press, 132–41.Google Scholar
Olwig, K.F. & Olwig, K., 1979. Underdevelopment and the development of the ‘natural’ park ideology. Antipode 11(2), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, C.S., 1992. Rooting out latent behaviorism in prehistory, in Representations in Archaeology, eds. Gardin, J.-C. & Peebles, C.S.. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press, 357–84.Google Scholar
Perlès, C., 1992. In search of lithic strategies: a cognitive approach to prehistoric chipped stone assemblages, in Representations in Archaeology, eds. Gardin, J-C. & Peebles, C.S.. Bloomington & Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press, 223–47.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R., 1968. Conjectures and Refutations. New York (NY): Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R., 1982a. The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism. Totowa (NJ): Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R., 1982b. Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics. Totowa (NJ): Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R., 1983. Realism and the Aim of Physics. Totowa (NJ): Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R., 1992. In Search of a Better World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R. & Eccles, J.C., 1977. The Self and Its Brain. New York (NY): Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1972. The Emergence of Civilisation: The Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium BC. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1982. Towards an Archaeology of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1985. The Archaeology of Cult, the Sanctuary at Phylakopi. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1987. Problems in the modelling of socio-cultural systems. European journal of Operational Research 30, 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1989. Comments on ‘Archaeology into the 1990s’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., in press. Towards a cognitive archaeology, in The Ancient Mind, eds. Renfrew, C. & Zubrow, E.B.W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. & P., Bahn, 1991. Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, I., 1992. The Strange, Familiar, and Forgotten. New York (NY): Knopf.Google Scholar
Sacks, O., 1993. Making up the mind. New York Review of Books, April 8 1993, 42–9.Google Scholar
Sanders, W.T., 1974. Chiefdom to state: political evolution at Kaminaljuyu, Guatemala, in Reconstructing Complex Societies: An Archaeological Colloquium, ed. C.B., Moore. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 97–121.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R., 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C., 1987a. Re-Constructing Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C., 1987b. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., 1992. Culture and matter, in Representations in Archaeology, eds. Gardin, J-C. & Peebles, C.S.. Bloomington & Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press, 56–65.Google Scholar
Tarlow, S., 1992. Each slow dusk a drawing down of blinds. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 11(1), 125–40.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., in press. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape, in Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, ed. B., Bender. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., in press. Art, architecture, landscape (Neolithic Sweden), in Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, ed. B., Bender. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Turner, V., 1978. Encounter with Freud: the making of a comparative symbologist, in The Making of Psychological Anthropology, ed. G.D., Spindler. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press, 558–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, S.A., 1987. Cognitive Anthropology. Prospect Heights (IL): Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Ucko, P.J. & Dimbleby, G.W. (eds.), 1969. The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ucko, P.J., Tringham, R. & Dimbleby, G.W. (eds.), 1972. Man, Settlement and Urbanism. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Washburn, D., 1983. Structure and Cognition in Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P., 1975. Satyanrta in Suvarnadvipa: from reciprocity to redistribution in ancient southeast Asia, in Ancient Civilization and Trade, eds. Sabloff, J.A. & Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C.. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press, 227–65.Google Scholar
White, L.A., 1940. The symbol: the origin and basis of human behaviour. Philosophy of Science 7, 461–3. (Reprinted in L.A. White, 1949. The Science of Culture. New York (NY): Grove Press, 22–39).Google Scholar
Whitley, D.S., 1992a. Prehistory and post-positivist science, in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, ed. M.B., Schiffer. Orlando (FA): Academic Press, 57–100.Google Scholar
Whitley, D.S., 1992b. Shamanism and rock art in far western North America. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., 1973. The Country and the City. Harmonds-worth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wynn, T., 1979. The intelligence of later Acheulean hominids. Man 14, 379–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar