Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:27:01.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics, History, and Causation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2011

Randall Morck  and
Bernard Yeung
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Economics and history both strive to understand causation: economics by using instrumental variables econometrics, and history by weighing the plausibility of alternative narratives. Instrumental variables can lose value with repeated use because of an econometric tragedy of the commons: each successful use of an instrument creates an additional latent variable problem for all other uses of that instrument. Economists should therefore consider historians' approach to inferring causality from detailed context, the plausibility of alternative narratives, external consistency, and recognition that free will makes human decisions intrinsically exogenous.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , Spring 2011 , pp. 39 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2011

References

1 Lazear, Edward, “Economic Imperialism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 1 (Feb. 2000): 99–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fischer, Irving, “Statistics in the Service of Economics,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 28, no. 181 (Mar. 1933): 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McCloskey, Deirdre N., The Rhetoric of Economics (Madison, Wisc., 1985).Google Scholar

2 Ford, Henry, with Crowther, Samuel, My Life and Work (Garden City, N.Y., 1922), 43–44Google Scholar; McLuhan, Marshall, The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man (Toronto, 1962)Google Scholar; Derrida, Jacques, De la Grammatologie (Paris, 1967).Google Scholar

3 Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter, “Economic Theory and Business History,” in The Oxford Handbook of Business History, ed. Jones, Geoffrey and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Oxford, 2007), ch. 3Google Scholar; Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1962)Google Scholar; Wilkins, Mira, The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass. 1970)Google Scholar; Hertner, Peter and Jones, Geoffrey, Multinationals: Theory and History (Aldershot, U.K., 1986)Google Scholar; Jones, Geoffrey, Multinationals and Global Capitalism: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, 2005); and many others.Google Scholar

4 Popper, Carl, Logik der Forschung (Vienna, 1934).Google Scholar

5 Wilson, Edward O., Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (New York, 1998), 47.Google Scholar

6 Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar

7 Malthus, Thomas, An Essay on the Principle of Population (London, 1798), 4.Google Scholar

8 Edgeworth, Francis, Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences (London, 1881), 77, 79.Google Scholar

9 Galbraith, John Kenneth, The New Industrial State (London, 1967), 36.Google Scholar

10 Levy, David and Peart, Sandra, “Soviet Growth and American Textbooks,” Economics Department, George Mason University working paper, 2009.Google Scholar

11 Krugman, Paul, The Conscience of a Liberal (New York, 2007)Google Scholar; Sachs, Jeffrey, The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time (New York, 2005)Google Scholar; Stiglitz, Joseph, Making Globalization Work (New York, 2006).Google Scholar

12 Rajan, Raghuram and Zingales, Luigi, Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists (Princeton, 2004)Google Scholar; Feldstein, Martin, “Rethinking the Role of Fiscal Policy,” American Economic Review 99, no. 2 (2009): 556–59; James Buchanan, “Public Choice: The Origins and Development of a Research Program,” Center for the Study of Public Choice at George Mason University, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar

14 Black, Fischer, “The Trouble with Econometric Models,” Financial Analysts Journal 38, no. 2 (1982): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Diamond, Jared and Robinson, James A., eds., Natural Experiments of History (Cambridge Mass., 2010).Google Scholar

16 Godley, Andrew, Jewish Immigrant Entrepreneurship in New York and London, 1880–1914: Enterprise and Culture (New York, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Henry, Peter and Miller, Conrad, “Institutions versus Policies: A Tale of Two Islands,” American Economic Review 99, no. 2 (2009): 261–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 King, Robert, and Levine, Ross, “Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3 (1993): 717–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Camerer, Colin, Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton, 2010)Google Scholar; Deaton, Angus, “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development,” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (June 2010): 424–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Diamond and Robinson, eds., Natural Experiments of History.

21 Tobin, James, “Money and Income: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 2 (1970): 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Banerjee, Abhijit and Iver, Lakshmi, “Colonial Land Tenure, Electoral Competition and Public Goods in India,” in Natural Experiments of History, ed. Diamond, Jared and Robinson, James A. (Cambridge, Mass., 2010), ch. 6.Google Scholar

23 Stock, James and Watson, Mark, Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd ed. (Boston, 2007).Google Scholar

24 Weimer, David, “Collective Delusion in the Social Sciences: Publishing Incentives for Empirical Abuse,” Review of Policy Research 5, no. 4 (1986): 705–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James, “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation,” American Economic Review 91, no. 5 (2001): 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 David Albouy, “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Investigation of the Settler Mortality Data,” National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 14130, 2008; Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson, “A Response to Albouy's ‘A Reexamination Based on Improved Settler Mortality Data,’ ” mimeo (Mar. 2005); Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson, “Reply to the Revised (May 2006) version of David Albouy's ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Investigation of the Settler Mortality Data’ ” (2006).

27 Hardin, Garrett, “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162, no. 3859 (1968): 1243–48.Google ScholarPubMed

28 Logarithmic utility assumes a subject's utility (hedonic pleasure) from consuming C to be a function of the form U = a log(C), while constant elasticity of substitution utility assumes U = C 1–a/(1 – a). The two are equivalent if a is 1, but not otherwise. Economic theorists often choose a functional form to make the algebra easier; however, results based on one form often do not follow if another is used instead.

29 Campbell, John, Lo, Andrew, and MacKinlay, A. Craig, The Econometrics of Financial Markets (Princeton, 1997), ch. 4.Google Scholar

30 Nelson, C. R., “The Prediction Performance of the F.R.B.-M.I.T.-Penn. Model of the U.S. Economy,” American Economic Review 62 (1972): 902–17Google Scholar; Roll, Richard, “R-Squared,” Journal of Finance 43, no. 3 (1988): 541–66Google Scholar; Diebold, Francis, “The Past, Present and Future of Macroeconomic Forecasting,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 2 (1998): 175–92; Ricardo Caballero, “Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretence-of-Knowledge Syndrome,” MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 10-16, 2010; and others.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Granger, Clive, “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods,” Econometrica 37 (1969): 424–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wiener, Norbert, “The Theory of Prediction,” in Modern Mathematics for Engineers I, ed. Beckenbach, E. F. (New York, 1956).Google Scholar

32 Muth, John, “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements,” Econometrica 29 (1961): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Summers, Lawrence and Stambaugh, Robert, “Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?” Journal of Finance 41, no. 3 (1986): 591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Jones, Geoffrey and Khanna, Tarun, “Bringing History (Back) into International Business,” Journal of International Business Studies 37 (2006): 453–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Fohlin, Caroline, “The History of Corporate Ownership and Control in Germany,” in A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers, ed. Morck, Randall K. (Chicago, 2005), 223–77Google Scholar; Morck, Randall K. and Nakamura, Masao, “Business Groups and the Big Push: Meiji Japan's Mass Privatization and Subsequent Growth,” Enterprise and Society 8, no. 3 (2007): 543–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Michie, Ranald, The Global Securities Market: A History (Oxford, 2008).Google Scholar

37 See Rajan, Raghuram and Zingales, Luigi, “The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century,” Journal of Financial Economics 69, no. 1 (2003): 5–50.Even communist China has established stock markets. Their contribution toward that country's further development remains to be seen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Haber, Stephen H., “Politics Banking, and Economic Development: Evidence from New World Economies,” in Natural Experiments of History, ed. Diamond, Jared and Robinson, James A. (Cambridge Mass., 2010), ch. 3.Google Scholar

39 Jones, and Khanna, , “Bringing History (Back) into International Business,” 453–68Google Scholar; Morck, Randall K. and Yeung, Bernard, “History in Perspective: Comment on Jones and Khanna, ‘Bringing History (Back) into International Business,’” Journal of International Business Studies 38 (2007): 357–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

41 Quoted in Wilson, Consilience: the Unity of Knowledge, 52.

42 Kragh, Helge, Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century (Princeton, 2002).Google Scholar

43 Larson, Edward, Evolution: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory (New York, 2004).Google Scholar

44 Wilkins, The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise; Hertner and Jones, Multinationals; Jones, Multinationals and Global Capitalism; and others.

45 Scranton, Philip, Endless Novelty: Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865–1925 (Princeton, 1997).Google Scholar

46 Morck, Randall, ed., A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (Chicago, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 Tolliday, Steven and Zeitlin, Jonathan, eds., The Automobile Industry and Its Workers: Between Fordism and Flexibility—Comparative Analysis of Developments in Europe, Asia, and the United States from the Late Nineteenth Century to the Mid-1980s (New York, 1987).Google Scholar

48 Engerman, Stanley and Fogel, Robert, Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery (Boston, 1974).Google Scholar

49 Fogel, Robert, The Slavery Debates, 1952–1990: A Retrospective (Baton Rouge, 2003)Google Scholar; Gutman, Herbert, Slavery and the Numbers Game: A Critique of Time on the Cross (Champaign, Ill., 2003).Google Scholar

50 Kindleberger, Charles, Manias, Panics and Crashes (New York, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 Lal, Deepak, The Poverty of “Development Economics” (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

52 Haber, Stephen H., How Latin America Fell Behind: Essays on the Economic Histories of Brazil and Mexico, 1800–1914 (Stanford, 1997).Google Scholar

53 Haber, Stephen, North, Douglass, and Weingast, Barry, Political Institutions and Financial Development (Stanford, 2008)Google Scholar; North, Douglass, Wallis, John, and Weingast, Barry, Violence and Social Orders (Cambridge, U.K., 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54 Laplace, Pierre-Simon, Essai philosophique sur les probabilités (1814), transl. by Truscott, Frederick and Emory, Frederick, A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities (Dover, U.K., 1951).Google Scholar

55 Mirowski, Philip, More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics (Cambridge, U.K., 1991).Google Scholar

56 Casson, Mark, Yeung, Bernard, Basu, Anuradha, and Wadeson, Nigel, eds., Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar; Casson, Mark, “Entrepreneurship,” in The Fortune Encyclopedia of Economics, ed. Henderson, D. R. (New York, 1993).Google Scholar

57 Cox, Richard and Wallace, David, eds., Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society (Westport, Conn., 2002).Google Scholar

58 Tufte, Edward, The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint (Cheshire, Conn., 2003).Google Scholar

59 Lakatos, Imre, Proofs and Refutations (Cambridge, U.K., 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60 Feyerabend, Paul, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge (London, 1975); Jones and Khanna, “Bringing History (Back) into International Business,” 453–68.Google Scholar

61 Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (London, 1776).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Lazear, “Economic Imperialism,” 99–146; Lamoreaux, Raff, and Temin, “Economic Theory and Business History,” in The Oxford Handbook of Business History, ed. Jones and Zeitlin, ch. 3.