Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:26:47.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trust, Risk, and Shareholder Decision Making: An Investor Perspective on Corporate Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Lori Verstegen Ryan  and
Ann K. Buchholtz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Shareholders’ relationship to the firm is a central theme in corporate governance, yet the investors’ perspective has been virtually ignored in governance research. This paper attempts to explain the previously unexplored role of trust in the investor decision-making process. The proposed model suggests that trust acts as the antecedent of the risk variable in existing investor decision-making models. Stock ownership involves both financial and ethical risk, which by definition requires some level of implicit trust in management and the market.

Type
Corporate Governance
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 177 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admati, A. R. and Pfleiderer, P. 1994. Large shareholder activism, risk sharing, and financial market equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy 102: 1097–1130.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1991/1932. The modern corporation and private property. Revised ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bigley, G. A. and Pearce, J. L. 1998. Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review 23: 405–421.Google Scholar
Boatright, J. R. 1994. What’s so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 393–407.Google Scholar
Brancato, C. K. 1997. Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance. Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
Brealey, R. R. and Myers, S. C. 1996. Principles of Corporate Finance. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Butler, J. K. Jr 1991. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management 17: 643–663.Google Scholar
Byrne, J. A. 1997. Governance: CEOs catch up with shareholder activists. Business Week, September 22, 1997, p. 36.Google Scholar
Chiles, T. H. and McMackin, J. F. 1996. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review 21: 73–99.Google Scholar
Chun, K. T. and Campbell, J. B. 1975. Notes on the internal structure of Wrightsman’s measure of trustworthiness. Psychological Reports 37: 323–330.Google Scholar
Clowes, M. 1995. Economic behavior not all numbers. Pensions and Investments, December 11, p. 10.Google Scholar
Couch, L. L.; Adams, J. M.; and Jones, W. H. 1996. The assessment of trust orientation. Journal of Personality Assessment 67: 305–323.Google Scholar
Dobson, J. 1999. Defending the stockholder model. Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 337–345.Google Scholar
Driscoll, J. W. 1978. Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal 21: 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunfee, T. W. 1998. The marketplace of morality: Small steps toward a theory of moral choice. Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 127–146.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. J.; McEwen, R. A.; and Spindle, R. M. 1994. Shareholder preferences concerning corporate ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics 13: 447–453.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1988. The Moral Dimension. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. 1984. Comment on Shiller’s “Stock prices and social dynamics.” The Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 457–510.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. E. 1991. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 53–73.Google Scholar
Greising, D. 1992. Hunting investors who will go the distance. Business Week, November 9, pp. 101–102.Google Scholar
Hasnas, J. 1998. The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 19–42.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F. 1993. What the new SEC rules do for activism. Institutional Investor, April, pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
Investor Relations Business. 1998. From governance to shareholder value. November 23, p. 4.Google Scholar
Investor Relations Business. 1999. Socially responsible mutual funds do well. September 6, p. 13.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. and Wallach, M. A. 1964. Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lease, R. C; Lewellen, W. G.; and Schlarbaum, G. G. 1974. The individual investor: Attributes and attitudes. The Journal of Finance 29: 413–433.Google Scholar
Lewellen, W. G.; Lease, R. C.; and Schlarbaum, G. G. 1977. Patterns of investment strategy and behavior among individual investors. The Journal of Business 50: 296–333.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
MacCrimmon, K. R. and Wehrung, D. A. 1990. Characteristics of risk taking executives. Management Science 36: 422–435.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. and Lewis, A. 1999. Morals and markets: The case of ethical investing. Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maital, S., Filer, R. and Simon, J. 1986. What do people bring to the stock market (besides money)? The economic psychology of stock market behavior. In Handbook of behavioral economics, ed. Gilad, B. and Kaish, S., pp. 273–307. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Shapira, Z. 1987. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science 33: 1404–1418.Google Scholar
McInish, T. H. 1982. Individual investors and risk-taking. Journal of Economic Psychology!: 125–136.Google Scholar
McInish, T. H.; Ramaswami, S. N.; and Srivastava, R. K. 1993. Do more risk-averse investors have lower net worth and income? The Financial Review 28: 91–106.Google Scholar
McInish, T. H. and Srivastava, R. K. 1984. Ex-ante expectations and portfolio selection. The Financial Review 19: 84–96.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1990. The Icarus Paradox: How exceptional companies bring about their own downfall. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, S. L. 1994. Long-term rewards from shareholder activism: A study of the “CalPERS effect.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 6: 75–80.Google Scholar
Osborn, R. N. and Jackson, D. H. 1988. Leaders, riverboat gamblers, or purposeful unintended consequences in the management of dangerous technologies. Academy of Management Journal 36: 701–732.Google Scholar
Rao, S. M. and Hamilton III, J. B. 1996. The effect of published reports of unethical conduct on stock prices. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 1321–1330.Google Scholar
Romano, R. 1993. Public pension fund activism in corporate governance reconsidered. Columbia Law Review 93: 795–853.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. 1956. Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review 21: 690–695.Google Scholar
Ross, J. and Staw, B. M. 1993. Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Academy of Management Journal 36: 701–732.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality 35: 651–665.Google Scholar
Ryan, L. V. 1995. Bridging the “agency gap”: An empirical test of managerialism and agency theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, BC, August.Google Scholar
Ryan, L. V. and Buchholtz, A. K. 1998. Opening the black box of shareholder motivation: Implications for corporate governance and management theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego, CA, August.Google Scholar
Schlenker, B. R.; Helm, B.; and Tedeschi, J. T. 1973. The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25: 419–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, J. and Karpinski, R. 1999. The price of success—Commerce sites scramble to meet unexpected demand. Internet Week, February 8, pp. 1, 59.Google Scholar
Scott III, C. L. 1980. Interpersonal trust: A comparison of attitudinal and situational factors. Human Relations 33: 805–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, R. J. 1984. Stock prices and social dynamics. The Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 457–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, R. J. 1990. Speculative prices and popular models. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 55–65.Google Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. 1992. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. In Research in organizational behavior, ed. Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L., pp. 231–266. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. and Pablo, A. L. 1992. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review 17: 9–38.Google Scholar
Staw, B.; Sandelands, L.; and Dutton, J. 1981. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 501–524.Google Scholar
Strickland, D.; Wiles, K. W.; and Zenner, M. 1996. A requiem for the USA: Is small shareholder monitoring effective? Journal of Financial Economics 40: 319–338.Google Scholar
Sundaramurthy, C. and Rechner, P. L. 1997. Conflicting shareholder interests. Business and Society 36: 73–87.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Johnson, E. J. 1990. Gambling with house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choices. Management Science 36: 643–660.Google Scholar
Useem, M. 1996. Investor capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wrightsman, L. S. Jr., 1964. Measurement of philosophies of human nature. Psychological Reports 14: 743–751.Google Scholar
Wrightsman, Jr L. S. 1974. Assumptions about human nature: A social-psychological approach. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar