Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:29:05.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Altruism, Ingroups, and Fairness: Comments on Messick's “Social Categories and Business Ethics”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2020

Edwin M. Hartman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In attacking utilitarianism Bernard Williams1 likes to consider the case of the man who has a choice of saving his wife or a stranger from drowning. Williams takes it as clear, and a problem for consequentialism, that the man has a moral obligation to save his wife. The relationship is a good thing without reference to consequences that one might suppose it requires if it is to be valuable.

David Messick suggests a consequentialist view of certain relationships—for example, those that create a limited altruism—that have survival value. Some kin relationships are like that; and insofar as they are, there is something to be said for them from a utilitarian point of view. Messick does not rest there, as his primary concern is fairness, but he does seem to hold that there is a utilitarian basis for valuing families and family ties. One need not be a sociobiologist to learn something about practical morality from the facts Messick adduces.

Type
Section IV
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue S1: The Ruffin Series Special Issue No.1 , 1998 , pp. 179 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Business Ethics Quarterly 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkan, Ilyse, and Badaracco, Joseph L. Jr. (1991) Ann Hopkins (A), Case 9-391-155 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Nalebuff, Bany. (1991) Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics and Everyday Life (New York: W. W. Norton and Company).Google Scholar
Hartman, Edwin M. (1994) “The Commons and the Moral Organization,” Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Edwin M. (1996) Organizational Ethics and the Good Life (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1993) Political Liberals (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. (1987) On Ethics and Economics (New York: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. (1992) Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1981) Moral Luck (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar