Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:04:54.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mental Health Act Commission and Second Opinions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Lord Colville
Lord Colville*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Act Commission
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I am grateful for the opportunity of commenting on a recent article by Dr Paul Bridges, ‘Psychosurgery and the Mental Health Act Commission’ (Bulletin, August 1984, 8, 146–48). It may be useful to clarify the areas where we agree with him and to put into context matters in which he is critical. In the latter case I wish to consider whether his criticism is accurately directed at the Commission's policies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 2 - 3
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1985
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.