1 Introduction
For any complex number a, we define
and
We set $E(q):=(q;q)_\infty =\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }(1-q^n)$ ; $E(q)$ is known as Euler’s product. We can view $E(q)$ as a particular case of Ramanujan’s theta function (see [Reference Berndt1, page 34]): that is,
Jacobi’s triple product identity (see [Reference Hirschhorn5, page 5]) is
Replacing $qz$ by a and $q/z$ by b in Jacobi’s triple product identity, yields
In particular,
A t-dissection of a power series $A(q)$ is given by $A(q)=\sum _{k=0}^{t-1}q^kA_k(q^t)$ , where the $A_k(q^t)$ are power series in $q^t$ . The $3$ -dissection of $E(q)$ (see [Reference Berndt1, entry 31, page 48]) is
We also have
which are, respectively, 5-, 7- and 11- dissections of $E(q)$ (see [Reference Berndt1, pages 82, 303 and 363]. A generalised form of these dissections is given in the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1 [Reference Berndt1, Theorem 12.1, page 274].
Suppose m is a positive integer with $m\equiv 1 \ (\text {mod}~6)$ . If $m=6t+1$ with t positive, then
If $m=6t-1$ with t positive, then
Theorem 1.1 was found independently by Ramanathan [Reference Ramanathan7] and Evans [Reference Evans4]. Recently, it was reproved by McLaughlin [Reference McLaughlin6] while establishing some other general dissections involving infinite products.
Hirschhorn [Reference Hirschhorn5, page 332] gave the 2- and 4- dissections of $E(q)$ as
where $(a_1, a_2,\ldots ,a_n;q)_\infty :=(a_1;q)_\infty (a_2;q)_\infty \cdots (a_n;q)_\infty $ .
Identity (1.2) was obtained by 4-dissecting the products $(q^6,q^{10},q^{16};q^{16})_\infty $ and $(q^2,q^{14},q^{16};q^{16})_\infty $ in (1.1). Hirschhorn also remarked that we can continue in the same manner and find the 8-dissection, the 16-dissection and so on. He concluded by noting the following conjecture on the $2^n$ -dissection of $E(q)$ .
Conjecture 1.2.
where
and
Cao [Reference Cao3] discussed product identities for theta functions using integer matrix exact covering systems. In particular, he gave the following result involving the product of two theta functions.
Theorem 1.3 [Reference Cao3, Corollary 2.2].
If $|ab|<1$ and $cd=(ab)^{k_1k_2}$ , where both $k_1$ and $k_2$ are positive integers, then
Finally, we give the following version of the quintuple product identity.
Theorem 1.4 (Quintuple product identity [Reference Berndt2, page 19]).
For $a\neq 0$ ,
We use (1.6), (1.7) and other properties of Ramanujan’s theta function to prove Conjecture 1.2. In Section 2, we mention some preliminary results involving Ramanujan’s theta function and the pentagonal numbers $P(n)$ . In Section 3, we provide the proof of Conjecture 1.2.
2 Preliminaries
Lemma 2.1. If $ab=cd$ , then
Proof. Set $k_1=k_2=1$ in (1.6).
Lemma 2.2 [Reference Berndt1, Entry 18, page 34].
For any integer n,
Lemma 2.3. We have
Proof. Set $n=1$ in (2.2).
Lemma 2.4. Let $P(n)$ be as in (1.5). For positive integers n and k,
Proof. We have
Replacing s and t by $2^{n+1}+k-1$ and $k-1$ , respectively, in (2.5), we find that
Lemma 2.5. If n is even and $c_k=P(-{(2^{n+1}-2)}/{3}+(k-1))$ , then
Proof. We have $c_k=P(((3k-2^{n+1})-1)/{3})$ , so
Similar calculations give the formulas in the following three lemmas.
Lemma 2.6. If n is even and $c_k=P(-{(2^{n+1}-2)}/{3}+(k-1))$ , then
Lemma 2.7. If n is odd and $c_k=P({(2^{n+1}-1)}/{3}-(k-1))$ , then
Lemma 2.8. If n odd is and $c_k=P({(2^{n+1}-1)}/{3}-(k-1))$ , then
3 Proof of the main result
Theorem 3.1. Conjecture 1.2 is true.
Proof. We set $a=-q$ , $b=-q^2$ , $c=-q^{2^{2n+2}} d=-q^{2^{2n+3}}$ , $k_1=k_2=2^{n+1}$ and $r=k-1$ in (1.6) to obtain
Since $f(-q,-q^2)=E(q)$ , $f(-q^{2^{2n+2}},-q^{2^{2n+3}})=E(q^{2^{2n+2}})$ , $P(k-1)={(k-1)(3k-4)}/{2}$ , we can rewrite (3.1) as
where
Now
Employing (2.4) and simplifying the exponents of the arguments of the theta functions, we can rewrite (3.4) as
Setting $a=q^{3\times 2^{2n+1}+2^n(6k-7)}$ , $b=q^{3\times 2^{2n+1}-2^n(6k-7)}$ , $c=-q^{2^{2n+2}}$ and $d=-q^{2^{2n+3}}$ in (3.6) gives
From (3.2),
where $H_k=(-1)^{k+1}q^{P(k-1)}f(q^{3\times 2^{2n+1}+2^n(6k-7)},q^{3\times 2^{2n+1}-2^n(6k-7)})$ . We now arrange the $H_k$ in pairs so that each of these pairs can be reduced to quintuple products. For this purpose, we consider two separate cases according to whether n is even or odd.
Case I: n is even. We consider
Note that $S_2$ is the sum of $H_1,H_2,\ldots ,H_{{(2^{n+1}+4)}/{3}}$ and $S_1$ is the sum of $H_{{(2^{n+1}+7)}/{3}}$ , $H_{{(2^{n+1}+10)}/{3}},\ldots ,H_{2^{n+1}}$ and so
We also note that $c_k$ is given by (1.4).
Now
Employing Lemma 2.5 in (3.13) and simplifying the exponents of the arguments of the theta functions, we find that
Also
Employing Lemma 2.6 in (3.15) and simplifying the exponents,
Substituting the expressions for $H_{{(2^{n+2}+2)}/{3}-k+1}$ and $H_{{(2^{n+2}+5)}/{3}+k-1}$ from (3.14) and (3.17), respectively, in (3.10), we find that
Further,
Also,
Employing Lemma 2.5 in (3.20) and simplifying the exponents,
Using (3.19) and (3.21) in (3.11),
From (3.12), (3.18) and (3.22),
Case II: n is odd. In this case, we consider the sums
Note that $S_3$ is the sum of $H_1,H_2,\ldots ,H_{{(2^{n+2}+4)}/{3}}$ and $S_4$ is the sum of $H_{{(2^{n+2}+7)}/{3}}$ , $H_{{(2^{n+2}+10)}/{3}},\ldots ,H_{2^{n+1}}$ and so
We also note that $c_k$ is given by (1.3).
We have
Similarly,
Using Lemma 2.7 in (3.28) and simplifying the exponents,
Now we employ (2.3) in (3.29) to obtain
Using (3.27) and (3.30) in (3.24),
Also,
Using Lemma 2.7 in (3.32) and simplifying the exponents,
Employing (2.2) in (3.33), we find that
Further,
Using Lemma 2.8 in (3.35), we find that
From (3.34), (3.37) and (3.25),
Substituting the expressions for $S_3$ and $S_4$ from (3.31) and (3.38), respectively, in (3.26),
From (3.23) and (3.39) we find that, for any positive integer n,
where the appropriate expression for $c_k$ is chosen according to whether n is even or odd.
Setting $A=-q^{-2^{2n+1}+2^n(2k-1)}$ and $Q=q^{2^{2n+2}}$ in (3.40), we obtain
Employing the quintuple product identity in (3.41),
Thus we have completed the proof of Conjecture 1.2.