Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:30:08.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EXTENSIONS OF AUTOCORRELATION INEQUALITIES WITH APPLICATIONS TO ADDITIVE COMBINATORICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2020

SARA FISH
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91126, USA email [email protected]
DYLAN KING
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA email [email protected]
STEVEN J. MILLER*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA email [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract

Barnard and Steinerberger [‘Three convolution inequalities on the real line with connections to additive combinatorics’, Preprint, 2019, arXiv:1903.08731] established the autocorrelation inequality

$$\begin{eqnarray}\min _{0\leq t\leq 1}\int _{\mathbb{R}}f(x)f(x+t)\,dx\leq 0.411||f||_{L^{1}}^{2}\quad \text{for}~f\in L^{1}(\mathbf{R}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where the constant $0.411$ cannot be replaced by $0.37$. In addition to being interesting and important in their own right, inequalities such as these have applications in additive combinatorics. We show that for $f$ to be extremal for this inequality, we must have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\max _{x_{1}\in \mathbb{R}}\min _{0\leq t\leq 1}\left[f(x_{1}-t)+f(x_{1}+t)\right]\leq \min _{x_{2}\in \mathbb{R}}\max _{0\leq t\leq 1}\left[f(x_{2}-t)+f(x_{2}+t)\right].\end{eqnarray}$$
Our central technique for deriving this result is local perturbation of $f$ to increase the value of the autocorrelation, while leaving $||f||_{L^{1}}$ unchanged. These perturbation methods can be extended to examine a more general notion of autocorrelation. Let $d,n\in \mathbb{Z}^{+}$, $f\in L^{1}$, $A$ be a $d\times n$ matrix with real entries and columns $a_{i}$ for $1\leq i\leq n$ and $C$ be a constant. For a broad class of matrices $A$, we prove necessary conditions for $f$ to extremise autocorrelation inequalities of the form
$$\begin{eqnarray}\min _{\mathbf{t}\in [0,1]^{d}}\int _{\mathbb{R}}\mathop{\prod }_{i=1}^{n}~f(x+\mathbf{t}\cdot a_{i})\,dx\leq C||f||_{L^{1}}^{n}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2020 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was supported by NSF grants DMS1659037 and DMS1561945, Wake Forest University and Williams College.

References

Barnard, R. and Steinerberger, S., ‘Three convolution inequalities on the real line with connections to additive combinatorics’, J. Number Theory 207 (2020), 4255.10.1016/j.jnt.2019.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J., Carbery, A., Christ, M. and Tao, T., ‘The Brascamp–Lieb inequalities: finiteness, structure and extremals’, Geom. Funct. Anal. 17 (2005), 13431415.10.1007/s00039-007-0619-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstheyn, A. and Tait, M., ‘Improved lower bound for difference bases’, J. Number Theory 205 (2020), 5058.10.1016/j.jnt.2019.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollobas, B., The Art of Mathematics: Coffee Time in Memphis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).10.1017/CBO9780511816574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Z., Li, J. and Li, W., ‘A note on distribution-free symmetrization inequalities’, J. Theoret. Probab. 28(3) (2015), 958967.10.1007/s10959-014-0538-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdős, P. and Gal, I., ‘On the representation of 1, 2, …, N by differences’, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. 51 (1948), 11551158.Google Scholar
Golay, M. J. E., ‘Notes on the representation of 1, 2, …, N by differences’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 4(4) (1972), 729734.10.1112/jlms/s2-4.4.729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselgrove, C. and Leech, J., ‘Note on restricted difference bases’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 32 (1957), 228231.10.1112/jlms/s1-32.2.228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, J., ‘On the representation of 1, 2, …, n by differences’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 31 (1956), 160169.10.1112/jlms/s1-31.2.160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. and O’Bryant, K., ‘The symmetric subset problem in continuous Ramsey theory’, Exp. Math. 16(2) (2007), 145166.10.1080/10586458.2007.10128993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pott, A., Kumaran, V., Helleseth, T. and Jungnickel, D., Difference Sets, Sequences and Their Correlation Properties, NATO Science Series C, 542 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2012).Google Scholar