Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:23:36.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic studies on Eulophidae of economic significance (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. J. Kerrich
G. J. Kerrich
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Achrysocharis diplosidis reared from galls of the Cecidomyiid Hyperdiplosis eupatorii Felt in Trinidad and Brazil is described, A. pulcherrima Kerrich is recorded from Pakistan, and a key separating these two gall-associated species of Achrysocharis Girault is given. Larval or pupal parasites of Promecotheca cumingii Baly (Hispidae) in Sri Lanka are described as Cotterellia lankensis, and of Promecotheca spp. in New Britain, Admiralty Is. and New Guinea Territory as C. insularis; C. podagrica Waterston is redescribed, and a key is given to the three species of Cotterellia Waterston ; the generic relatives of Cotterellia are discussed and a key separating this genus from Platocharis Kerrich and Schizocharis Kerrich is given. Rekabia Cameron is placed in synonymy with Euplectrus Westwood, and notes are given on material for a classification of the relatives of Stenomesius Westwood.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , June 1974 , pp. 629 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. (1887). Studies on the North American Chalcididae, with descriptions of new species, chiefly from Florida.—Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 14, 183–203.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. (1904). Classification of the Chalcid flies or the superfamily Chalcidoidea, with descriptions of new species in the Carnegie Museum, collected in South America by Herbert H. Smith.—Mem. Carneg. Mus. 1, no. 4, xxi+225–551.Google Scholar
Askew, R. R. (1968). Hymenoptera. 2. Chalcidoidea. Section (b). Elasmidae and Eulophidae (Elachertinae, Eulophinae, Euderinae).—Handbk Ident. Br. Insects 8 (2b), 39 pp.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1948). Gall midges of economic importance. Volume 3: Gall midges of fruit.—184 pp. London, Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1962). A new Stenomesius (Hym., Eulophidae) reared from Ceramidia viridis in Ecuador.—Entomophaga 7, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burks, B. D. (1967). Superfamily Chalcidoidea. In Krombein, K. V. & Burks, B. D. (Eds.) Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico, synoptic catalog. Second supplement. Washington, D.C., USGPO. (USDA Agriculture Monograph no. 2). pp. 213–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, P. (1904). 1 New Hymenoptera mostly from Nicaragua. In Baker, C. F., Invertebrata pacifica. pp. 46–69. Claremont, California.Google Scholar
Ferrière, C. (1941). New species of Euplectrini (Hym. Chalcidoidea) from Europe, Africa and Asia.—Bull. ent. Res. 32, 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahan, A. B. & Fagan, M. M. (1923). The type species of the genera of Chalcidoidea or Chalcid-flies.—Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 124, 1–173.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. (1913). Australian Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea—IV. The Family Eulophidae with descriptions of new genera and species.—Mem. Qd Mus. 2, 140–296.Google Scholar
Howard, L. O. (1885). Descriptions of North American Chalcididae from the collections of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and of Dr C. V. Riley, with biological notes. [First paper]. Together with a list of the described North American species of the family.—Bull. Bur. Ent. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 5, 47 pp.Google Scholar
Howard, L. O. (1894). Report on the Chalcididae of the subfamilies Chalcidinae, Eucharinae, Perilampinae, Encyrtinae, Aphelininae, Pireninae, Elasminae and Elachistinae [of the Island of St. Vincent].—J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 25, 79–108.Google Scholar
Howard, L. O. (1896). On the Chalcididae of the Island of Grenada, B.W.I.—J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 26, 129–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerrich, G. J. (1969). Systematic studies on Eulophid parasites (Hym., Chalcidoidea), mostly of coffee leaf-miners in Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerrich, G. J. (1970). On the taxonomy of some African Eulophidae (Hym., Chalcidoidea) associated with oil palm, coffee and mango.—Bull. ent. Res. 60, 327–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masi, L. (1917). Chalcididae of the Seychelles Islands with an appendix by J. J. Kieffer.—Novit. zool. 24, 121–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohwer, S. A. (1921). Descriptions of new Chalcidoid flies from Coimbatore, south India.—Ann. Mag. not. Hist. 7, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. (1909). Hymenoptera fam. Chalcididae.—Gen. Ins. 97, 1–550.Google Scholar
Subba, Rao B. R. & Sharma, A. K. (1966). Two new species of parasites reared from Stomopteryx nerteria (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechidae).—Indian J. Ent. 28, 299–304.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. (1878). Hymenoptera Scandinaviae. Tom 5: Pteromalus (Svederus) continuatio. 307 pp. Lund.Google Scholar
Waterston, J. (1925). On some Eulophid parasites (Hym., Chalcidoidea) of the oil palm Hispid beetle.—Bull. ent. Res. 15, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, J. O. (1832). Description of several new British forms among the parasitic Hymenoptera.—Land. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. Mag. (3) 1, 127–129.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. (1833). Description of several new British forms among the parasitic Hymenoptera.—Land. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. Mag. (3) 3, 342–344.Google Scholar