Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:51:49.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population sampling for planthoppers, leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Delphacidae & Cicadellidae) and their predators in flooded rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

T. J. Perfect
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research InstituteCollege HouseWrights Lane London W8 5SJUK.
A. G. Cook
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research InstituteCollege HouseWrights Lane London W8 5SJUK.
E. R. Ferrer
Affiliation:
Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources ResearchLos BañosLaguna Philippines

Abstract

Studies on the precision levels and efficiencies of available insect suction samplers (D-Vac and FARMCOP) were undertaken in the Philippines to determine the best possible sampling procedure to derive absolute population estimates of delphacids, cicadellids and their predators in flooded rice. The D–Vac suction sampler when used in conjunction with an enclosure placed over the rice hill prior to sampling was found to be the most suitable. The sampling procedure adopted is described in detail, and sampling efficiencies for the D–Vac are given for nymphs and adults of the delphacids and cicadellids and their predators. These values could be used by other workers following the sampling procedures described here on modern rice varieties grown under flooded conditions to achieve absolute population estimates.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cariño, F. O.Kenmore, P. E.Dyck, V. A.. (1979). The FARMCOP suction sampler for hoppers and predators in flooded rice fields. — Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 4 (5), 2122.Google Scholar
Cheng, S. N., Chen, J. C., Si, H., Yan, L. M., Chu, T. L., Wu, C. T., Chien, J. K., Yan, C. S. (1979). Studies on the migrations of brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Stål. — Acta ent. sin. 22, 121.Google Scholar
Dietrick, E. J.. (1961). An improved backpack motor fan for suction sampling of insect populations. — J. econ. Ent. 54, 394395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, V. A., Misra, B. C., Alam, S., Chen, C. N., Hsieh, C. Y.Rejesus, R. S. (1979). Ecology of the brown planthopper in the tropics.in Brown planthopper: threat to rice production in Asia. — pp. 6198Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, Int. Rice Res. Inst.Google Scholar
IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) (1979). Annual Report for 1978.—478 pp. Los Baños PhilippinesInt. Rice Res. Inst..Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G., Southwood, T. R. E., Entwistle, H. M.. (1957). A new method of extracting arthropods and molluscs from grassland and herbage with a suction apparatus. — Bull. ent. Res. 48, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisimoto, R. (1976). Synoptic weather conditions inducing long-distance immigration of planthoppers, Sogatella furcifera Horv´th and Nilaparvata lugens Stål. — Ecol. Entomol. 1, 95109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, E. (1977). Distribution pattern of the rice brown planthopper and field sampling techniques. in The rice brown planthopper. — Taipei, Taiwan, Food and Fertilizer Technology Center for the Asian and Pacific Region. — pp. 135146Google Scholar
MacQuillan, M. J. (1974). Influence of crop husbandry on rice planthoppers (Hemiptera; Delphacidae)in the Solomon Islands. — Agroecosystems 1, 339358.Google Scholar
Soehardjan, M.. (1973). Observations on leaf–and planthoppers on rice in West Java. —Contribution Central Research Institute for Agriculture Bogor no. 3,10 pp.Google Scholar
Wan, M. T. K.. (1972). Observations on rice leaf and plant hoppers in Sarawak (Malaysian Borneo). — Malaysian agric. J. 48, 308335.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. B.. (1965). The distribution and population dynamics of Neophilaenus lineatus (L.) and N. exdamationis (Thun.) (Homoptera: Cercopidae) on Pennine moorland. — J. Anim. Ecol. 34, 277297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar