Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T09:59:28.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Louse Control through Textile Fibre Size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. Hocking
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta.

Extract

The possibility of controlling the human body louse, Pediculus humanus humanus L., through the development of clothing which is inimical to it on physical rather than chemical grounds was investigated. Claw size in lice was shown to be related to diameter of host hair. The grip force of lice on fabrics made of fibres of various diameters and compositions, some spun and some unspun, and of various weaves largely dictated by availability, was measured with an apparatus of which the essential parts were a torsion balance and a kymograph motor. The force was found to be a maximum at fibre-diameters approximating that of human hair. The ability of lice to grab hold of a fabric when dropped on to an inclined surface of it was also measured and found to vary with fibre-diameter in a similar manner to grip, but less strongly. The number of eggs laid on fabrics when no choice was offered was also found to vary with fibre-diameter in a similar manner. While this physical method of louse control is not promising for immediate practical application, it has possibilities which may be enhanced by developments in textile technology.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon (1949). Canadian formulary, 1949.Google Scholar
Allen, N. N. & Dicke, R. J. (1953). Cattle lice control by clipping.—J. econ. Ent., 45, pp. 970973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1947). The louse.—164 pp. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
Eddy, G. W. (1953). Effectiveness of certain insecticides against DDT-resistant body lice in Korea.—J. econ. Ent., 45, pp. 10431051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hase, A. (1915). Beiträge zu einer Biologie der Kleiderlaus (Pediculus corporis de Geer = vestimenti Nitzsch).—Z. angew. Ent., 2, pp. 265359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, L. A. (1920). Structural characteristics of the hair of mammals.—Amer. Nat., 54, pp. 496523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, G. H. E. (1943). Notes on Trichodectidae (Mallophaga).—Rev. brasil. Biol., 3, pp. 1128.Google Scholar
Hopkins, G. H. E. (1949). The host-associations of the lice of mammals.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 119, pp. 387604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbut, H. S., Altman, R. M. & Nibley, C. jr (1952). DDT resistance in Korean body lice.—Science, 115, pp. 1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, G. T. & McMurtry, C. W. (1912). Diseases of the hair.—366 pp. New York.Google Scholar
Larose, P. (1945). Newer fibres.—Canad. Chem. Process Ind., 29, pp. 476479.Google Scholar
Lochte, T. (1938). Atlas der menschlichen und tierischen Haare.—306 pp. Leipzig, Schops.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1917). Studies on Pediculus. I. The copulatory apparatus and the process of copulation in Pediculus humanus.—Parasitology 9, pp. 293324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toldt, K. (1935). Aufbau und natürliche Färbung des Haarkleides der Wild-säugetiere.—291 pp. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1941). The sensory physiology of the human louse Pediculus humanus corporis De Geer (Anoplura).—Parasitology 33, pp. 67109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar