Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:08:54.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The life-history and host specificity of Comostolopsis germana Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), a biological control agent of Chrysanthemoides monilifera (Compositae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. J. Adair  and
J. K. Scott
R. J. Adair
Affiliation:
Keith Turnbull Research Institute, Department of Conservation, Forests & Lands, P.O. Box 48, Frankston 3199, Australia
J. K. Scott
Affiliation:
CSIRO Biological Control Unit, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Larvae of the southern African geometrid moth Comostolopsis germana Prout feed on the shoot apices and axillary buds of Chrysanthemoides monilifera, a serious alien weed of native vegetation in Australia. The insect was found in low abundance throughout the distribution of its hosts, C. incana and C. monilifera, in southern Africa. Larvae were present throughout the year in subtropical Natal, but were absent in winter in the cooler, Mediterranean type climate of Cape Province. In host-specificity tests using 65 plant species from 26 families, Comostolopsis germana completed development only on Chrysanthemoides monilifera monilifera and C. monilifera rotundata. Insignificant, exploratory feeding occurred on Olearia axillaris (Compositae) and pea, Pisum sativum (Leguminosae). In multiple-choice oviposition tests eggs were laid on 41 species, but a strong preference was shown for the foliage and stems of C. monilifera. Larvae grazing the flower buds, pedicels and peduncles of C. monilifera may reduce the reproductive capacity of their host and contribute to its control. Comostolopsis germana has been approved for release as a biological control agent of Chrysanthemoides monilifera in Australia.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , November 1989 , pp. 649 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cullen, J. M. & Delfosse, E. S. (1985). Echium plantagineum: catalyst for conflict and change in Australia.—pp. 249–292 in Delfosse, E. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, University of British Columbia, Vancouver B.C., Canada, 19–25 August 1984.—885 pp. Ottawa, Agriculture Canada.Google Scholar
Dodkin, M. J. & Gilmore, A. M. (1985). Species and ecosystems at risk—a preliminary review.—pp. 33–52 in Love, A. & Dyason, R. (Eds). Proceedings of a conference on Chrysanthemoides monilifera, Pt. Macquarie, 8–9 August 1984.—125 pp. Natn. Parks and Wildlife Serv. and Dep. Agric. N.S.W.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. S. (1978). Geometridae (Lepidoptera) collected by Dr J. Szunyoghy in Tanzania.—Acta zool. Acad. sci. hung. 24 (1–2), 41–105.Google Scholar
Gray, M. (1976). Miscellaneous notes on Australian plants. 2. Chrysanthemoides (Compositae).—Contr. Herb. Australiense 16, 1–5.Google Scholar
Herbulot, C. (1980). Mission P. Viette à la Grande Comore Lepidoptera Geometridae.—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 85, 266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, S. M. (1985). The potential distribution of bitou bush in Australia.—pp. 69–77 in Love, A. & Dyason, R. (Eds). Proceedings of a conference on Chrysanthemoides monilifera, Pt. Macquarie, 8–9 August 1984.—125 pp. Natn. Parks and Wildlife Serv. and Dep. Agric. N.S.W.Google Scholar
Neser, S. & Morris, M. J. (1985). Preliminary observations on natural enemies of Chrysanthemoides monilifera in South Africa.—pp. 105–109in Love, A. & Dyason, R. (Eds). Proceedings of a conference on Chrysanthemoides monilifera, Pt. Macquarie, 8–9 August 1984.—125 pp. Natn. Parks and Wildlife Serv. and Dep. Agric. N.S.W.Google Scholar
Norlindh, T. (1943). Studies in the Calenduleae. I. Monograph of the genera Dimorphotheca, Castalis, Osteospermum, Gibbaria, and Chrysanthemoides.—423 pp. Lund, C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Palgrave, K. C. (1977). Compositae.—p. 913 in Moll, E. J. (Ed.). Trees of southern Africa.—959 pp. Cape Town, C. Struik.Google Scholar
Prout, L. B. (1931). Geometridae Vol. 16.—106 pp. in Seitz, A. (Ed.). The macrolepidoptera of the world. Fauna-Africana. Stuttgart, A. Kernen Verlag.Google Scholar
Prout, L. B. (1934). New species and subspecies of Geometridae.—Novit. zool. 39 (2), 99–136.Google Scholar
Schulze, B. R. (1984). Climate of South Africa. Part 8. General survey.—330 pp. Pretoria, South Africa, Weather Bureau.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. S. (1957). Notes on Lepidoptera in the Eastern Cape Province (part IV).—J. ent. Soc. sth. Africa 20, 315–332.Google Scholar
Toelken, H. R. (1983). Compositae.—pp. 330–314 in Morley, B. D. & Toelken, H. R. (Eds). Flowering plants in Australia.—416 pp. Adelaide, Rigby.Google Scholar
Wapshere, A. J. (1974). A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control.—Ann. appl. Biol. 77, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, P. W. (1986). The biology of Australian weeds 14. Chrysanthemoides monilifera (L.) T. Norl.—J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 52, 127–134.Google Scholar