Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:06:05.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of diazinon selection upon two organophosphorus-resistant field strains of Lutilia Cuprina (Wied.) (Diptera, Calliphoridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. J. Shanahan  and
N. A. Roxburgh
G. J. Shanahan
Affiliation:
Biological and Chemical Research Institute, N.S.W. Department of Agriculture, P.M.B. 10, Rydalmere, N.S.W. 2116, Australia
N. A. Roxburgh
Affiliation:
Biological and Chemical Research Institute, N.S.W. Department of Agriculture, P.M.B. 10, Rydalmere, N.S.W. 2116, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two field strains of Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) of different susceptibilities to diazinon were selected over 25 generations by immersion of first-instar larvae in aqueous emulsions of diazinon for five minutes ; the resistance of the larvae and adult females was compared with a standard laboratory susceptible strain. Resistance increased rapidly in both strains, reaching a maximum for adult females (R.F. = 5–6) in generation 3 and for larvae (R.F. = 46–60) in generation 6. After removal of selection pressure at generation 8 the resistance factor fell to 20–24 by generation 25. Because the resistance mechanisms are known to place their carriers at a disadvantage in the absence of selection pressure, the practical implications of the rapid increase in resistance must await results of experiments with known genotypes.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , June 1974 , pp. 567 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, J. T. A. (1972). Population genetics of organophosphate resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly (Lucilia cuprina Wied.)—Abstracts–Int. Congr. Ent. 265.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1959). Inheritance of insecticide resistance and tolerance.—Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. 1, 20–26.Google Scholar
Bruce, W. N. & Decker, G. C. (1950). House-fly tolerance for insecticides.—Soap (N.Y.) 26, 122–125, 145–147.Google Scholar
Davidson, G. (1958). Studies on insecticide resistance in Anopheline mosquitos.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 18, 579–621.Google ScholarPubMed
Decker, G. C. & Bruce, W. N. (1952). House fly resistance to chemicals.—Am. J. trap. Med. Hyg. 1, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgash, A. J. & Hansens, E. J. (1962). Effect of selection on cross resistance in diazinon-resistant Musca domestica.—J. econ. Ent. 55, 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, I. R. (1967). The development of organophosphorus insecticide resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wied.)—Vet. Rec. 80, 205–206.Google Scholar
Hart, R. J. (1969). Recent developments in sheep blowfly control.—Proc. N.S.W. Div. Aust. Vet. Ass. 5, 14–15.Google Scholar
Roxburgh, N. A. & Shanahan, G. J. (1973). A method for the detection and measurement of insecticide resistance in larvae of Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) (Dipt., Calliphoridae).—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuntner, C. A. & Roulston, W. J. (1968). A resistance mechanism in organophosphorus-resistant strains of sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.—Aust. J. biol. Sci. 21, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanahan, G. J. (1961). Genetics of dieldrin resistance in Lucilia cuprina (Wied.).—Genet. agr. 14, 307–321.Google Scholar
Shanahan, G. J. (1966). Development of changed response in Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) to organophosphorus insecticides in New South Wales.—Bull. ent. Res. 57, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, G. J. (1967). The sheep blowfly's tolerance of insecticides.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 78 444–445.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. F. (1947). The relative importance of live sheep and of carrion as breeding grounds for the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina.—Bull. Commonw. scient. ind. Res. Org. no. 217, 31 pp.Google Scholar