Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:58:04.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Density independence of survival in myiasis breeding of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. Dallwitz
R. Dallwitz
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, CSIRO, G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Survival, size and development time were measured for larvae of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) reared in artificially induced strikes on sheep. Between 477 and 18 000 eggs or larvae were implanted in the fleece of 42 sheep. Survival was found not to depend significantly on implant numbers. Size and development time were significantly but only weakly dependent on implant numbers. These results contrast markedly with L. cuprina's performance on carrion.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 171 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, R. J. & Nelder, J. A. (1978). The GLIM system: generalized linear interactive modelling.—Oxford, Numerical Algorithms Group.Google Scholar
Cragg, J. B. (1955). The natural history of sheep blowflies in Britain.—Ann. appl. Biol. 42, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallwitz, R., Roberts, J. A. & Kitching, R. L. (1984). Factors determining the predominance of Lucilia cuprina larvae in blowfly strikes of sheep in southern New South Wales.—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 23, 175–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, G. G. (1980). Genetic control of sheep blowfly (Lucilia cuprina) and the logistics of the CSIRO control programme.—Wool Technol. Sheep Breed. 28 (1), 5–10.Google Scholar
Foster, G. G., Kitching, R. L., Vogt, W. G. & Whitten, M. J. (1975). Sheep blowfly and its control in the pastoral ecosystem of Australia.—Proc. ecol. Soc. Aust. 9, 213–229.Google Scholar
Kitching, R. L. (1981). The sheep blowfly: a resource-limited specialist species.—pp. 193–214in Kitching, R. L. & Jones, R. E. (Eds.). The ecology of pests: some Australian case histories.—254 pp. Melbourne, CSIRO.Google Scholar
Knipling, E. F. (1968). The potential role of sterility for pest control.—pp. 7–40in LaBrecque, G. C. & Smith, C. N. (Eds.). Principles of insect chemosterilization.—354 pp. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. (1950). Competition for food amongst Lucilia cuprina larvae.—Proc. 8th Int. Congr. Ent. 277–281.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. (1957). The self-adjustment of populations to change.—Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 22, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. H., Dallwitz, R., Wardhaugh, K. G., Vogt, W. G. & Woodburn, T. L. (1981). Timing of larval exodus from sheep and carrion in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.—Entomologia exp. appl. 30, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, W. G., Woodburn, T. L., Ellem, B. A., van Gerwen, A. C. M., Barton Browne, L. — Wardhaugh, K. G. (1985 a). The relationship between fecundity and oocyte resorption in field populations of Lucilia cuprina.—Entomologia exp. appl. 39, 91–99.Google Scholar
Vogt, W. G., Woodburn, T. L. & van Gerwen, A. C. M. (1985 b). The influence of oocyte resorption on ovarian development rates in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.—Entomologia exp. appl. 39, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, K. G. & Dallwitz, R. (1984). Covert flystrike.—Wool Technol. Sheep Breed. 32, 15–19.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, K. G., Vogt, W. G., Dallwitz, R. & Woodburn, T. L. (1983). The abundance of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) in relation to strike incidence in southern New South Wales: some preliminary findings.—pp. 109–121in Sheep blowfly and flystrike in sheep: second national symposium, Sydney.—472 pp. (Unpublished report, N.S.W. Dep. Agric. and Australian Wool Corp.)Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. F. (1947). The relative importance of live sheep and of carrion as breeding grounds for the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina.—Bull. Coun. Scient. ind. Res., Melb. no. 217, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Whitten, M. J., Foster, G. G., Vogt, W. G., Kitching, R. L., Woodburn, T. L. & Konovalov, C. (1977). Current status of genetic control of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae).—Proc. XV Int. Congr. Ent. 129–139.Google Scholar