Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:31:43.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The inhibitory effect of seedling grasses on feeding and survival of Acridids (Orthoptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. A. Bernays
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ
R. F. Chapman
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ
J. Horsey
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ
E. M. Leather
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ

Abstract

The amounts eaten by Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. & F.) on seedling grasses was less than on mature grasses in four other Acridids, Nomadacris septemfasciata (Serv.), Chortoicetes terminifera (Wlk.), Melanoplus sanguinipes (F.) and Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.). Palatability of the young grasses increases with age, becoming maximal 6–10 weeks from the time of germination. Similar preferences were shown by other Acridids. Time-lapse film studies on Locusta showed that not only is less time spent feeding on seedling grasses, but that locomotor activity levels are considerably higher. Survival studies on the same species showed higher mortality on the seedlings as compared with the mature leaves at all stages of nymphal development, while on seedlings no individuals survived to the adult stage. Lipid-soluble materials were removed from seedling leaves with chloroform or acetone and this rendered them more acceptable, while the extract applied to mature leaves resulted in reduced palatability.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aasen, A. J., Culvenor, C. C. J, Finnie, E. P., Kellock, A. W., & Smith, L. W. (1969). Alkaloids as a possible cause of ryegrass staggers in grazing livestock.—Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 7186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D., (1956). The European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis (Hubn.), and its principal host plant. I. Orientation and feeding behaviour of the larva on the corn plant.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 49, 552558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D., (1960). The European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis (Hubn.), and its principal host plant. VII. Larval feeding behaviour and host plant resistance.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53, 206212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D. & Stauffer, J. F. (1957). The European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis (Hubn.), and its principal host plant. III. Toxic factors influencing larval establishment.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 50, 166170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernays, E. A., & Chapman, R. F., (1972). Meal size in nymphs of Locusta migratoria.—Entomologia exp. appl. 15, 399410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaney, W. M., Chapman, R. F. & Wilson, A. (1973). The pattern of feeding of Locusta migratoria (L.) (Orthoptera, Acrididae).—Acrida 2, 119137.Google Scholar
Culvenor, C. C. J., Dal Bon, R., & Smith, L. W., (1964). The occurrence of indolealkylarnine alkaloids in Phalaris tuberosa L., and P. arundinacea L.—Aust. J. Chem. 17, 13011304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De wilde, J., Bongers, W. & Schooneveld, H., (1969). Effects of hostplant age on phytophagous insects.—In de Wilde, J. & Schoonhoven, L. M. (Eds) Insect and host plant. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1969, 714720. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
El-Ibrashy, M. T., El-Ziady, S., & Riad, A. A., (1972). Laboratory studies on the biology of the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae).—Entomologia exp. appl. 15, 166174.Google Scholar
Goodhue, R. D., (1962). The effects of stomach poisons on the desert locust.—Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Harley, K. L. S., & Thorsteinson, A. J., (1967). The influence of plant chemicals on the feeding behaviour, development, and the survival of the two-striped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), Acrididae: Orthoptera.—Can. J. Zool. 45, 305319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, G. B., (1969). Feeding preferences of nymphal and adult grasshoppers as related to the developmental stage of the plant.—Unpubl. report, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Hunter-Jones, P., (1961). Rearing and breeding locusts in the laboratory.—12 pp. London, Anti-Locust Research Centre.Google Scholar
Klun, J. A.,& Brindley, T. A. (1966). Role of 6-methoxybenzoxazolinone in inbred resistance of host plant (maize) to first brood larvae of European corn borer.—J. econ. Ent. 59, 711718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. D., Steinhart, C. E., & Mudd, S. H. (1963). Alkaloids and plant metabolism. V. The distribution and formation of tyramine methylpherase during germination of barley.—J. biol. Chem. 238, 676681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951). Insect resistance in crop plants.—520 pp.New York, MacMillan.Google Scholar
Webster, J. A. & Smith, D. H. Jr. (1971). Seedlings used to evaluate resistance to the cereal leaf beetle.—J. econ. Ent., 64, 925928.Google Scholar
Williams, L. H. (1954). The feeding habits and food preferences of Acrididae and the factors which determine them.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Land. 105, 423454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar