Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:08:18.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inbreeding depression in two seed-feeding beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus and Stator limbatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2007

C.W. Fox ,
K.L. Scheibly ,
B.P. Smith  and
W.G. Wallin
C.W. Fox*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA
K.L. Scheibly
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA
B.P. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA
W.G. Wallin
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA
*
*Fax: 859 323 1120 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inbreeding depression is well documented in insects but the degree to which inbreeding depression varies among populations within species, and among traits within populations, is poorly studied in insects other than Drosophila. Inbreeding depression was examined in two long-term laboratory colonies of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius), which are used frequently as models for experiments in ecology, evolution and behaviour. Inbreeding depression in these laboratory colonies are compared with one recently field-collected population of a different seed beetle, Stator limbatus Horn. Inbreeding reduced embryogenesis, egg hatch and larval survival in both species, such that eggs produced by sib matings were >17% less likely to produce an adult offspring. Inbred larvae also took 4–6% longer to develop to emergence in both species. Inbreeding depression varied among the measured traits but did not differ between the two populations of C. maculatus for any trait, despite the large geographic distance between source populations (western Africa vs. southern India). Inbreeding depression was similar in magnitude between C. maculatus and S. limbatus. This study demonstrates that these laboratory populations of C. maculatus harbour substantial genetic loads, similar to the genetic load of populations of S. limbatus recently collected from the field.

Keywords

inbreeding depressionegg hatchlarval survivalembryogenesisStator limbatusCallosobruchus maculatus
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 49 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armbruster, P. & Reed, D.H. (2005) Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnqvist, G., Nilsson, T. & Katvala, M. (2005) Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils. Behavioral Ecology 16, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieri, J. & Kawecki, T.J. (2003) Genetic architecture of differences between populations of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) evolved in the same environment. Evolution 57, 274–287.Google ScholarPubMed
Carr, D.E. & Dudash, M.R. (2003) Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences 358, 1071–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D.A. (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83, 260–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, C.W. (2005) Problems in measuring among-family variation in inbreeding depression. American Journal of Botany 92, 1929–1932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, C.W. & Scheibly, K.L. (2006) Variation in inbreeding depression among populations of the seed beetle, Stator limbatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 121, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C.W., Bush, M.L., Roff, D.A. & Wallin, W.G. (2004a) Evolutionary genetics of lifespan and mortality rates in two populations of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Heredity 92, 170–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, C.W., Czesak, M.E. & Wallin, W.G. (2004b) Complex genetic architecture of population differences in adult lifespan of a beetle: nonadditive inheritance, gender differences, body size and a large maternal effect. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, 1007–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C.W., Scheibly, K.L., Wallin, W.G., Hitchcock, L.J., Stillwell, R.C. & Smith, B.J. (2006) The genetic architecture of life span and mortality rates: gender and species differences in inbreeding load of two seed-feeding beetles. Genetics 174, 763–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankham, R. (2005) Stress and adaptation in conservation genetics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 750–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilligan, D.M. & Frankham, R. (2003) Dynamics of genetic adaptation to captivity. Conservation Genetics 4, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, D.M., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. (2005) Comparative losses of quantitative and molecular genetic variation in finite populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 85, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henter, H.J. (2003) Inbreeding depression and haplodiploidy: experimental measures in a parasitoid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution 57, 1793–1803.Google Scholar
Kawecki, T.J. (1995) Expression of genetic and environmental variation for life-history characters on the usual and novel hosts in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Heredity 75, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, L.L., Levy, A., McNellis, J.M., Greene, K.P. & Futuyma, D.J. (1999) Tests of inbreeding effects on host-shift potential in the phytophagous beetle Ophraella communa. Evolution 53, 561–567.Google ScholarPubMed
Kristensen, T.N., Dahlgaard, J. & Loeschcke, V. (2003) Effects of inbreeding and environmental stress on fitness using Drosophila buzzatii as a model organism. Conservation Genetics 4, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, M.G. & Hawkins, B.A. (2004) Effects of inbreeding versus outbreeding in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Environmental Entomology 33, 765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. (1991) Life history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. (1993) Heritability and evolvability of fitness components in Callosobruchus maculatus. Heredity 71, 623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. (2004a) How labile are the egg-laying preferences of seed beetles? Ecological Entomology 29, 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. (2004b) Predictable modification of body size and competitive ability following a host shift by a seed beetle. Evolution 58, 2788–2797.Google ScholarPubMed
Messina, F.J. & Karren, M.E. (2003) Adaptation to a novel host modifies host discrimination by the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Animal Behaviour 65, 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1991) The traits of a biotype of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) from south India. Journal of Stored Products Research 27, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, G.E. & Farrell, B.D. (2005a) Ecological and evolutionary diversification of the seed beetle genus Stator (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Evolution 59, 1315–1333.Google ScholarPubMed
Morse, G.E. & Farrell, B.D. (2005b) Interspecific phylogeography of the Stator limbatus species complex: the geographic context of speciation and specialization. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, D.H., Lowe, E.H., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. (2003) Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution 57, 1822–1828.Google Scholar
Roff, D.A. (1998) Effects of inbreeding on morphological and life history traits of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Heredity 81, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roff, D.A. (2002) Inbreeding depression: tests of the overdominance and partial dominance hypotheses. Evolution 56, 768–775.Google ScholarPubMed
Saccheri, I.J., Lloyd, H.D., Helyar, S.J. & Brakefield, P.M. (2005) Inbreeding uncovers fundamental differences in the genetic load affecting male and female fertility in a butterfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences 272, 39–46.Google Scholar
Tran, B.M.D. & Credland, P.F. (1995) Consequences of inbreeding for the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 56, 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vamosi, S.M. (2005) Interactive effects of larval host and competition on adult fitness: an experimental test with seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Functional Ecology 19, 859–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, L.M., Montgomery, M.E., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. (2002) Rapid genetic deterioration in captive populations: causes and conservation implications. Conservation Genetics 3, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamane, T. & Miyatake, T. (2005) Intra-specific variation in strategic ejaculation according to level of polyandry in Callosobruchus chinensis. Journal of Insect Physiology 51, 1240–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed