Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:14:32.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of constitutive resistance in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and Scots pine (P. sylvestris) on oviposition by three pine feeding herbivores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. E. Trewhella ,
S. R. Leather  and
K. R. Day
K. E. Trewhella*
Affiliation:
Forestry Commission, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9SY, UK:
S. R. Leather
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks, SL5 7PY, UK:
K. R. Day
Affiliation:
Environmental Research Group, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland
*
School of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Wales, PO Box 915, Cardiff, CF1 3TL.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The acceptance of different provenances or seed origins of lodgepole pine Pinus contorta and Scots pine P. sylvestris as suitable oviposition sites was found to vary as a function of both tree age and insect species. Experiments on seedling lodgepole pine revealed that the pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer Geoffroy (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae), and the larch bud moth, Zeiraphera diniana Guennée (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), preferred more southerly provenances of lodgepole pine. The pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea Denis & Schiffermüller (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), however, preferred more northerly provenances. On mature lodgepole pine however, P. flammea exhibited a host change, preferring the more southerly provenances. Neodiprion sertifer showed a similar preference on both seedling and mature provenances. The results of this study suggest that some provenances of lodgepole pine become more resistant to attack by P. flammea as they mature, while others become more susceptible. This may be related to the feeding, strategies of the two insects: P. flammea larvae feed on current year foliage while N. sertifer feeds only on previous year foliage. It is possible that the mechanism for chemical defence of new shoots changes as the trees mature, and to a varying degree in different provenances, while defence of the previous years foliage remains unchanged. Results also indicate that odour alone as opposed to odour plus visual stimulation may invoke different ovipositional behaviour in N. sertifer.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 81 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldhous, J.R. (1976) Lodgepole pine seed zones with reference to British requirements. in Lines, R. (Ed.) Pinus contorta provenance studies. Forestry Commission Bulletin 111, 6–40.Google Scholar
Beck, S.D. & Schoonhoven, L.M. (1980) Insect behaviour and plant resistance. pp. 115–135in Maxwell, F.G. & Jennings, P.R. (Eds) Breeding plants resistant to insects. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Chenier, J.V.R. & Philogene, B.J.R. (1989) Field responses of certain forest Coleoptera to conifer monoterpenes and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 1729–1745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, F.S. & Robbins, R.K. (1984) Egg-laying in butterflies. pp. 65–79in Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P.R. (Eds) The biology of butterflies. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Craig, T.P., Itami, J.K. & Price, P.W. (1988) Plant wound compounds from oviposition scars used in host discrimination by a stem-galling sawfly. Journal of Insect Behavior 1, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, W.J. (1975) The effect of stand size and vegetational background on the colonization of cruciferous plants by herbivorous insects. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 517–533.Google Scholar
Day, K., Leather, S.R. & Lines, R. (1991) Damage by Zeiraphera diniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) of various provenances. Forest Ecology and Management 44, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V.G. (1959) Egg-laying habits of Lepidoptera in relation to available food. Canadian Entomologist 91, 554–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, J.C., Payne, T.L., Ryker, L.C. & Rudinsky, J.A. (1984) Single cell responses of the Douglas-fir beetle Dendroctonus pseudotsuga Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromones and host odors. Journal of Chemical Ecology 10, 583–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fatzinger, C.W. & Merkel, E.P. (1985) Oviposition and feeding preferences of the southern pine coneworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) for different host-plant materials and observations on monoterpenes as an oviposition stimulant. Journal of Chemical Ecology 11, 689–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feeny, P. (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defence. pp. 1–40in Wallace, J.W. & Mansell, R.L. (Eds) Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Recent advances in phytochemistry, vol. 10. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, G.I. (1980) Geographical variation in the monoterpenes of Pinus contorta oleoresin. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 8, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, J. (1987) Size discrimination among conspecific hostplants in two pierid butterflies; Pieris napi L. and Pontia daplidice L. Oecologia 72, 52–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, R.S. & Nobel, J. (1989) Plant resistance, plant traits, and host plant choice of the leaf-folding sawfly on the arroyo willow. Ecological Entomology 14, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghent, A.W. (1959) Row-type oviposition in Neodiprion sawflies as exemplified by the European pine sawfly, N. sertifer (Geoff.). Canadian Journal of Zoology 37, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertzen, L.R. & Small, E. (1993) The defensive role of trichomes in black medick (Medicago lupulina, Fabaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 184, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeters, F.R., Tabashnik, B.E., Finson, N. & Johnson, M.W. (1992) Oviposition preference of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) unaffected by the presence of conspecific eggs or Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18, 2353–2362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haukioja, E., Ruohomaki, K. & Suomela, J. (1991) Nutritional quality as a defence against herbivores. Forest Ecology and Management 39, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, P.M. (1978) How discriminating are cabbage butterflies? Australian Journal of Ecology 3, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jactel, H., Menassieu, P. & Raise, G. (1994) Infestation dynamics of Dioryctria sylvestrella (Ratz) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) in pruned maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait). Forest Ecology and Management 67, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenike, J. (1978) On optimal oviposition behaviour in phytophagous insects. Theoretical Population Biology 14, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klijnstra, J.W. (1986) The effect of an oviposition deterring pheromone on egg laying in Pieris brassicae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 41, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, H. (1992) Inhibition of ovipositional responses of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) by the trichomes on the lower leaf suffice of a maize cultivar. Journal of Economic Entomology 85, 1736–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, S. & Ekbom, B. (1995) Oviposition mistakes in herbivorous insects - confusion or a step towards a new host giant. Oikos 72, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latheef, M.A. & Irwin, R.D. (1979) Factors affecting oviposition of Pieris rapae on cabbage. Environmental Entomology 8, 606–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R. (1985) Oviposition preferences in relation to larval growth rates and survival in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea. Ecological Entomology 10, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R., Watt, A.D. & Barbour, D.A. (1985) The effect of host-plant and delayed mating on the fecundity and lifespan of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D&S) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): their influence on population dynamics and relevance to pest management. Bulletin of Entomological Research 75, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R., Watt, A.D. & Forrest, G.I. (1987) Insect-induced chemical changes in young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta): the effect of previous defoliation on oviposition, growth and survival of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea. Ecological Entomology 12, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A.C. (1979) Feeding preference for diseased and wilted sunflower in the grasshopper Melanoplus differentialia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 26, 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liedl, B.E., Lawson, D.M., White, K.K., Shapiro, J.A., Cohen, D.E., Carson, W.G., Trumble, J.T. & Mutschler, M.A. (1995) Acylsugars of wild tomato Lycopersicon pennellii alters settling and reduces oviposition of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera, Aleyrodidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 88, 742–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lines, R. (1966) Choosing the right provenance of lodgepole pine. Journal of the Royal Scottish Forestry Society 20, 90–103.Google Scholar
Lundgren, L. (1975) Natural plant chemicals acting as oviposition deterrents on cabbage butterflies (Pieris brassicae) (L.), P. rapae (L.) and P. napi (L.)). Zoologica Scripta 4, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, D.A. (1985) Conspecific host discrimination by ovipositing Euphydryas editha butterflies: Its nature and its consequences for offspring survivorship. Researches on Population Ecology 27, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.R. & Borden, J.H. (1990a) The use of monoterpenes as kairomones by Ips latidens (Leconte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Entomologist 122, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.R. & Borden, J.H. (1990b) Beta-phellandrene: kairomone for pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 2519–2531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, W.D. (1977) Differential host selection by Pieris brassicae (the large white butterfly) on Brassica oleracea subsp. Oleracea (the wild cabbage). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 22, 208–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mopper, S. & Simberloff, D. (1995) Differential herbivory in an oak population – the role of plant phenology and insect performance. Ecology 76, 1233–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norlander, G., Eidmann, H.H. & Jacobsson, U. (1986) Orientation of the pine weevil Hylobius abietis to underground sources of host volatiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 41, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oloffsson, E. (1989) Oviposition behaviour and host selection in Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffr.) (Hym., Diprionidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 107, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, T.L., Billings, R.F., Delorme, J.D., Vite, J.P., Andryszak, N.A. & Bartels, J. (1987) Kairomonal-pheromonal system in the black turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus terebrans (Ol.). Journal of Applied Entomology 103, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausher, M.D. (1979) Larval habitat suitability and oviposition preference in three related butterflies. Ecology 60, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausher, M.D. (1981) The effect of native vegetation on the susceptibility of Aristolochia reticulata (Aristolochiaceae) to herbivore attack. Ecology 62, 1187–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausher, M.D., Mackay, D.A. & Singer, M.C. (1981) Pre and post-alighting host discrimination by Euphydryas editha butterflies: the behavioral mechanisms causing clumped distribution of egg clusters. Animal Behaviour 29, 1220–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. & Schoonhoven, L.M. (1977) Assessment of egg load by Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Nature 266, 352–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, L.M. & Lindelow, A. (1989) Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 807–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soetens, P.H., Rowell-Rathier, M. & Pasteels, J.M. (1991) Influence of phenoglucosides and trichome density on the distribution of insect herbivores on willow. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 59, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E., Wheelock, H., Rainbolt, J.D. & Watt, W.B. (1981) Individual variation in oviposition preference in the butterfly Colias eurytheme. Oecologia 50, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, C.D. (1989) Predator-herbivore interactions and the escape of isolated plants from phytophagous insects. Oikos 55, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A.D. & Leather, S.R. (1988) The pine beauty in Scottish lodgepole pine plantations. pp. 243–266in Berryman, A.A. (Ed.) Dynamics of forest insect populations. Plenum Publishing Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E.H. (1981) Thermal influences on oviposition in the montane butterfly E. editha. Oecologia 50, 342–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K.S. & Gilbert, L.E. (1981) Insects as selective agents on plant vegetative morphology: egg mimicry reduces egg laying by butterflies. Science 50, 342–346.Google Scholar
Wright, J.W., Wilson, L.F. & Randall, W.K. (1967) Differences among Scotch pine varieties in susceptibility to European pine sawfly. Forest Science 13, 175–181.Google Scholar