Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:31:40.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2013

Thomas Pepinsky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism has generated wide interest. This article reviews three prominent books on authoritarian institutions and their central theoretical propositions about the origins, functions and effects of dominant party institutions on authoritarian rule. Two critical perspectives on political institutions, one based on rationalist theories of institutional design and the other based on a social conflict theory of political economy, suggest that authoritarian institutions are epiphenomenal on more fundamental political, social and/or economic relations. Such approaches have been largely ignored in this recent literature, but each calls into question the theoretical and empirical claims that form the basis of institutionalist approaches to authoritarian rule. A central implication of this article is that authoritarian institutions cannot be studied separately from the concrete problems of redistribution and policy making that motivate regime behavior.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 631 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Government, Cornell University (email [email protected]). An earlier version was presented at the conference How Autocracies Work: Beyond the Electoral Paradigm, University of Michigan. Thanks to Val Bunce, Bill Case, Anna Grzymala-Busse, Allen Hicken, Kevin Morrison, Dick Robison and Garry Rodan for helpful comments and discussion. All errors are my own.

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Egorov, Georgy Sonin, Konstantin. 2009. Coalition Formation in Non-Democracies. Review of Economic Studies 75:987–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Ozler, Sule, Roubini, Nouriel Swagel, Phillip. 1996. Political Instability and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1:189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, Svolik, Milan W.. 2010.The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-sharing in Dictatorships. Working paper. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1352065, accessed 16 December 2012.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2009. Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science 53:515–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall. 1995. Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions. In Explaining Social Institutions, edited by Jack Knight and Itai Sened, 57–95. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, LaPorte, Jody Seawright, Jason. 2012. Putting Typologies to Work: Concept-Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor. Political Research Quarterly 65:217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Magaloni, Beatriz Weingast, Barry R.. 2001. Tragic Brilliance: Equilibrium Party Hegemony in Mexico. Manuscript, Hoover Institute.Google Scholar
Easterly, William Levine, Ross. 1997. Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 12:1203–1250.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 2002. Islam and Authoritarianism. World Politics 55:4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funston, N.J. 1980. Malay Politics in Malaysia: A Study of the United Malays National Organisation and Party Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. Elections Under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 2:403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Cheng Teik. 1971. The May Thirteenth Incident and Democracy in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. Taylor, Rosemary C.R.. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44:936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, Kanishka Rodan, Garry. 2007. Beyond Hybrid Regimes: More Participation, Less Contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization 14:773–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Dong-Wook. 2009. Does Institutionalized Cooperation under Dictatorships Breed Good Economic Performance? Bring Regime Classifications Back In. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 4, 2009.Google Scholar
Lee, Myoung-Jae. 2003. Exclusion Bias in Sample-Selection Model Estimators. Japanese Economic Review 54:229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Political Studies 41:715–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz Kricheli, Ruth. 2010. Political Order and One Party Rule. Annual Review of Political Science 13:123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, Brian G.M. Reilly, Barry. 1993. The Employer Size-Wage Gap: Evidence for Britain. Economica 60:125–142.Google Scholar
Malesky, Edmund J. Schuler, Paul. 2010. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review 104:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund J., Abrami, Regina M. Zheng, Yu. 2011. Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China. Comparative Politics 43:409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miliband, Ralph. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. Mukherjee, Bumba. 2009. Democratization and Economic Globalization. Annual Review of Political Science 12:163–181.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2009. Economic Crises and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten Tabellini, Guido. 1994. Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? American Economic Review 84:600–621.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94:251–267.Google Scholar
Rasiah, Rajah Schmidt, Johannes Dragsbaek, eds. 2008. The New Political Economy of Southeast Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Alger.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review 74:432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodan, Garry, Hewison, Kevin Robison, Richard, eds. 2001. The Political Economy of South-East Asia: Conflict, Crises and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodan, Garry Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2012. Hybrid Regimes: A Social Foundations Approach. In Hybrid Regimes: A Social Foundations Approach, edited by Jeffrey Haynes, 175–189. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey D. Warner, Andrew M.. 2001. Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review 45:827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangmpam, S.N. 2007. Politics Rules: The False Primacy of Institutions in Developing Countries. Political Studies 55:201–224.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1986. Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions. In Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions, edited by Herbert F. Weisberg, 51–82. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 2006. Old Questions and New Answers about Institutions: The Riker Objection Revisited. In Old Questions and New Answers about Institutions: The Riker Objection Revisited, edited by Barry R. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman, 1031–1049. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 2010. The Rules of the Game: What Rules? Which Game? Paper presented at the Conference on the Legacy and Work of Douglass C. North, St. Louis, MO. Available from http://scholar.harvard.edu/kshepsle/files/north_paper_2010.pdf, accessed 16 December 2012.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Benjamin. 2005. Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule. World Politics 57:421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2009. Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53:477–494.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Vorys, Karl. 1975. Democracy without Consensus: Communalism and Political Stability in Malaysia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62:35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 2008. Do Authoritarian Political Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 52:322–343.Google Scholar
Zainon, Ahmad Phang, Lew-Ann. 2005. The All-Powerful Executive. The Sun, 1 October.Google Scholar