Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:19:32.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Getting a Hand By Cutting Them Off: How Uncertainty over Political Corruption Affects Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2018

Abstract

Criminal violence differs from other conflicts because illegal cartels primarily use violence to eliminate rivals rather than overthrow the state. However, politicians’ ability to influence cartel behavior remains unclear. This article argues that politicians alter the use of violence by setting their jurisdiction’s police enforcement levels, but that cartels can bribe politicians to look the other way. Because cartels are uncertain about politicians’ corruptibility, not every bribe is successful. Following an election, cartels must invest resources into learning politicians’ level of corruption. Cartels only increase their level of violence after successfully bribing political leaders, which implies that local violence levels should increase the longer parties remain in office. The study formalizes this argument and tests its implications using data on homicides and political tenure from Mexico. The results link incumbency to violence and suggest Mexico experiences an additional 948 homicides for each year of increased political tenure after holding an election.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego and Institute for Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University (email: [email protected]); Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh (email: [email protected]). Previous versions of this article were presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, International Studies Association and Western Political Science Association conferences as well as seminars at UC Riverside, UCLA and Rochester. We thank Sergio Ascencio, Regina Bateson, Peter Bils, Kevin Clarke, Jesse Driscoll, Kent Eaton, James Fowler, Omar García-Ponce, Matthew Gichohi, Thad Kousser, David Lake, Benjamin Laughlin, Alexander Lee, Ben Lessing, Brad LeVeck, John Patty, Aila Matanock, Will Moore, MaryClare Roche, Phil Roeder, Arturas Rozenas, Emily Sellers, Branislav Slantchev, Brad Smith, Barbara Walter, Michael Weintraub and anonymous referees for their feedback. We are indebted to Rzan Akel, Andrea de Barros and Jacob Boeri for excellent research assistance. Zachary acknowledges research support from the National Science Foundation. All errors remain the authors’ own. Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at https://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZNDVPW and online appendices at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000746.

References

Achen, Christopher H. 2000. Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. University of Michigan Working Paper.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2014. Vicente Carrillo Fuentes Arrested: Alleged Leader Of Juarez Cartel Nabbed In Mexico’s Torreon. 9 October.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bateson, Regina. 2012. Crime Victimization and Political Participation. American Political Science Review 106 (3):570587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42:12601288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beittel, June S. 2010. Mexico’s Drug-Related Violence. Collingdale, PA: Diane Publishing.Google Scholar
Bohórquez, Enrique. 2011. Presentación del “Índice Nacional de Corrupción y Buen Gobierno”. No. 142, INAP, Serie Praxis, Mexico.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2013. Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace. American Journal of Political Science 57 (2):294311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, Miguel. 2013. The Impact of Criminal Violence on Regime Legitimacy in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 48 (3):85107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Alberto, O., Ana De La, Karlan, Dean, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2015. Does Corruption Information Inspire the fight or Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Turnout, Choice, and Party Identification. The Journal of Politics 77 (1):5571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Vicente, Pedro C.. 2012. Violence, Bribery, and Fraud: The Political Economy of Elections in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Choice 153 (1–2):117147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, Cesi, Labonne, Julien, and Querubin, Pablo. 2017. Politician Family Networks and Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from the Philippines. American Economic Review 107 (10):30063037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, Cesi, and Keefer, Philip. 2015. Political Parties, Clientelism, and Bureaucratic Reform. Comparative Political Studies 48 (14):19421973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Jeff. 2009. Issue Voting and Crime in Gubernatorial Elections. Social Science Quarterly 90 (3):632651.10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00635.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Bó, Ernesto, Dal Bó, Pedro, and Di Tella, Rafael. 2006. “Plata o Plomo?”: Bribe and Punishment in a Theory of Political Influence. American Political Science Review 100 (1):4153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La O, Ana. 2016. Can Intrastate Accountability Reduce Local Capture? Results from a Field Experiment in Mexico. Presented at the Stanford Comparative Politics Workshop, Stanford, CA, March.Google Scholar
Dell, Melissa. 2015. Traffcking Networks and the Mexican Drug War. American Economic Review 105 (6):17381779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickenson, Matthew. 2014. The Impact of Leadership Removal on Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 30 (4):651676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Alexander. 2007. Draining the Sea by Filling the Graves: Investigating the Effectiveness of Indiscriminate Violence as a Counterinsurgency Strategy. Civil Wars 9 (4):420444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, Arindrajit, Dube, Oeindrila, and García-Ponce, Omar. 2013. Cross-Border Spillover: US Gun Laws and Violence in Mexico. American Political Science Review 107 (3):397417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, James. 1970. Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables. Econometrica 38 (3):410421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrleman, Sylvain, and Simon, Richard. 1989. Flexible Regression Models with Cubic Splines. Statistics in Medicine 8 (5):551561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espinosa, Valeria, and Rubin, Donald B.. 2015. Did the Military Interventions in the Mexican Drug War Increase Violence? The American Statistician 69 (1):1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. American Journal of Political Science 22 (2):426443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans-Morse, Jordan, Mazzuca, Sebastían, and Nichter, Simeon. 2014. Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics During Elections. American Journal of Political Science 58 (2):415432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 1999. War is in the Error Term. International Organization 53 (3):567587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., Kim, Soo Yeon, and Yoon, David H.. 2001. Dirty Pool. International Organization 55 (2):441468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, Eduardo. 2009. Narcotrafico S.A. Revista Nexos, January. Available at https://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=12885.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hyde, Susan D., and Jablonski, Ryan S.. 2014. When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence? British Journal of Political Science 44 (1):149179.10.1017/S0007123412000671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2007. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15 (3):199236.10.1093/pan/mpl013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Alisha. 2016. Forebearance. American Political Science Review 110 (2):232246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Bradley E., and Rios, Viridiana. 2015. Informally Governing Information How Criminal Rivalry Leads to Violence Against the Press in Mexico. Journal of Conflict Resolution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, David, and O’Brien, Robert. 1998. The Determinants of Deadly Force: A Structural Analysis of Police Violence. American Journal of Sociology 103 (4):837862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil Wars. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, Paul Rexton. 2012. Cartels at War: Mexico’s Drug-Fueled Violence and the Threat to U.S. National Security. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke, and Kelly, Nathan J.. 2006. Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables. Political Analysis 14 (2):186205.10.1093/pan/mpj006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting. American Journal of Political Science 23 (3):495527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. Sociotropic Politics: the American Case. British Journal of Political Science 11 (2):129161.10.1017/S0007123400002544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiviet, Jan F., and Phillips, Garry D. A.. 1993. Alternative Bias Approximations in Regressions With A Lagged-Dependent Variable. Econometric Theory 9 (1):6280.10.1017/S0266466600007337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronick, Dorothy. 2014. Crime and Electoral Punishment. Working Paper, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Lessing, Benjamin. 2013. The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars: Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia. CDDRL Working Paper No. 145, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Lessing, Benjamin. 2014. How to Build a Criminal Empire from Behind Bars: Prison Gangs and Projection of Power. Working Paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2003. Dynamics of Contention. Social Movement Studies 2 (1):99102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miron, Jeffrey A. 1999. Violence and the U.S. Prohibitions of Drugs and Alcohol. American Law and Economics Review 1 (1):78114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Patrick A. P. 1950. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena. Biometrika 37 (1–2):1723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nájar, Alberto. 2014. México: el hombre que disolvió en ácido a 300 personas. BBC Mundo, August.Google Scholar
Nickell, Stephen. 1981. Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica 49 (6):14171426.10.2307/1911408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio, Javier. 2013. Hobbes on Drugs: Understanding Drug Violence in Mexico. PhD Dissertation, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Reed, William. 2003. Information, Power, and War. American Political Science Review 97 (4):633641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resa Nestares, Carlos. 2001. El estado como maximizador de rentas del crimen organizado: El caso del trafico de drogas en Mexico [The state as a maximizer of organized crime rents: The case of drug trafficking in Mexico], Coleccion de Documentos. Tema 1: Sistema politico y gobernabilidad democratica. Madrid: Biblioteca de Ideas del Instituto Universitario de Gobernabilidad, October.Google Scholar
Resa Nestares, Carlos. 2003. El valor de las exportaciones mexicanas de drogas ilegales, 1961-2000 [The value of Mexican exports of illegal drugs, 1961–2000]. Madrid: Departamento de Estructura Economica y Economia del Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Rider, Toby J. 2013. Uncertainty, Salient Stakes, and The Causes of Conventional Arms Races. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3):580591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rios, Viridiana. 2012. Why did Mexico Become So Violent? A Self-Reinforcing Violent Equilibrium Caused by Competition and Enforcement. Trends in Organized Crime 16 (2):118.Google Scholar
Rios, Viridiana. 2015. How Government Coordination Controlled Organized Crime The Case of Mexico’s Cocaine Markets. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (8):14331454.10.1177/0022002715587052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1994. An Empirical Investigation of the Dynamics of PAC Contributions. American Journal of Political Science 38 (3):745769.10.2307/2111605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2013. Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sabet, Kevin, and Rios, Viridiana. 2009. Why Violence Has Increased in Mexico and What Can We Do About It? Working Paper Harvard University, November.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M., and Morgenstern, Scott. 2008. Candidate Recruitment and Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis. Latin American Politics and Society 50 (4):2758.10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00029.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaniel, William, and Smith, Bradley C.. 2015. Sanctions, Uncertainty, and Leader Tenure. International Studies Quarterly 59 (4):735749.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics With Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99 (3):315325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varese, Federico. 2011. Mafias On the Move: How Organized Crime Conquers New Territories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy M. 2006. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolford, Scott. 2007. The Turnover Trap: New Leaders, Reputation, and International Conflict. American Journal of Political Science 51 (4):772788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabludovsky, Karla. 2013. Former Mexican Governor Gets 11 Years for Taking Drug Bribes, New York Times, 28 June.Google Scholar
Zachary, Paul. 2017. Replication Data for: Getting a Hand By Cutting Them Off: How Uncertainty over Political Corruption Affects Violence. doi: 10.7910/DVN/ZNDVPW, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:2fQ6Hnsm2IpzBGXBlN31zw==.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Zachary and Spaniel supplementary material

Appendix

Download Zachary and Spaniel supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.2 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Zachary and Spaniel Dataset

Link