Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:17:26.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factories for Votes? How Authoritarian Leaders Gain Popular Support Using Targeted Industrial Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2014

Ji Yeon Hong  and
Sunkyoung Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the link between industrial policy and electoral outcomes under dictatorship. Using a difference-in-differences analysis of county-level panel data from 1971–88 in South Korea, it examines whether the industrial policy implemented by an authoritarian government affects constituents’ electoral decisions. It finds that counties receiving economic benefits through the construction of industrial complexes cast more votes for the incumbent party in subsequent elections. The effects are larger in elections immediately after the appointment of an industrial complex or at the beginning of its construction compared to elections held after the completion of construction. Furthermore, the study tests and rejects reverse causality and migration effects as possible alternative mechanisms for the changes in electoral outcomes. Finally, to understand a unique feature of authoritarian elections, it tests whether industrial complexes affect electoral fraud. Using a genetic matching methodology, it finds that places with new industrial complexes are less likely to experience electoral fraud.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 501 - 527
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (email: [email protected]); Department of Politics, New York University (email: [email protected]). We would like to thank Paul Y. Chang, Oeindrila Dube, Woo Chang Kang, Nae-Young Lee, Ben Pasquale, Adam Przeworski, Jae Hyeok Shin, Pedro Silva, panel participants at the 2012 Association of Asian Studies Annual Conference and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Any errors or omissions are our own. Online appendices and data replication sets are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000349.

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Hyde, Susan D.. 2008. Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beber, Bernd, and Scacco, Alexandra. 2012. What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud. Political Analysis 20 (2):235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2010. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubaraks Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Svolik, Milan W.. 2013. The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships. The Journal of Politics 75 (2):300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market. American Journal of Political Science 48 (4):742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerda, Rodrigo, and Vergara, Rodrigo. 2008. Government Subsidies and Presidential Election Outcomes: Evidence for a Developing Country. World Development 36 (11):2470–2488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2006. The East Asian Development Experience: The Miracle, the Crisis and the Future. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cho, Ki Suk. 1994. The Rationality of Yochonyado: For the Application of the Boolean Comparative Method. The Korean Political Science Review 27 (2):53–75 [in Korean].Google Scholar
Cho, Ki Suk. 2000. Regional Voting and Rational Voters. Seoul, Korea: Nanam [in Korean].Google Scholar
Choi, Jang Jip. 1996. A Condition and Prospect of Korean Democracy. Seoul, Korea: Nanam [in Korean].Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2009. Authoritarian Elections and Leadership Succession, 1975–2004. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada, 4 September.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1995. Multi-Dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions. American Journal of Political Science 39 (3):683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1997. From Ballots to Bullets: An Empirical Assessment of How National Elections Influence State Uses of Political Repression. Electoral Studies 16 (4):517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La O, andAna L, . 2013. Do Conditional Cash Transfers Affect Electoral Behavior? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science 57 (1):1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1996. The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics. Journal of Politics 58 (4):1132–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jeniffer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jeniffer, and Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. Elections Under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12:403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jeniffer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2006. Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion Under Dictatorship. Economics & Politics 18 (1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2006. Why Parties and Elections in Authoritarian Regimes? Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hyde, Susan D., and Jablonsk, Ryan S.. 2014. When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence? British Journal of Political Science 44:149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Nathan, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2004. Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa. Comparative Political Studies 37 (7):816–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1987. Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Government Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. In The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism, edited by Fredric Deyo, 136–164. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, Sungman. 2007. Maffling Through Korean Geisha and Tenfolding North Korean Threats, 6 July. Available from http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/media/214786.html, accessed 15 March 2014.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Trejo, Guillermo. 1997. Regionalism, Regime Transformation, and PRONASOL: The Politics of the National Solidarity Programme in Four Mexican States. Journal of Latin American Studies 29 (3):717–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C. I. Eugene, Kihl, Young-Whan, and Chung, Doock-Kyou. 1973. Voter Turnout and the Meaning of Elections in South Korea. Asian Survey 13 (11):1062–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jae-On, and Koh, B. C.. 1972. Electoral Behavior and Social Development in South Korea: An Aggregate Data Analysis of Presidential Elections. The Journal of Politics 34 (3):825–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Man Heum. 1997. Recognition of Korean Politics: Democracy, Regionalism and Localization. Seoul, Korea: Pulbit [in Korean].Google Scholar
Kim, Wonik, and Gandhi, Jennifer. 2010. Coopting Workers Under Dictatorship. The Journal of Politics 72:646–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Kap Yun. 1998a. Korean Election and Regionalism. Seoul, Korea: Orum [in Korean].Google Scholar
Lee, Nam Young. 1998b. Korean Election II: Focusing on the 15th Presidential Election. Seoul, Korea: Purumgil [in Korean].Google Scholar
Little, Andrew T. 2012. Elections, Fraud, and Election Monitoring in the Shadow of Revolution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7:249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, Ellen. 2006. Elections Under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan. Democratization 13 (3):456–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East. Journal of Democracy 20 (3):122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manacorda, Marco, Miguel, Edward, and Vigorito, Andrea. 2011. Government Transfers and Political Support. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (3):1–28.Google Scholar
Mebane, Walter R Jr.. 2008. Election Forensics: The Second-Digit Benford Law’s Test and Recent American Presidential Elections. In Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation, edited by Michael Alvarez, Thad E. Hall and Susan D. Hyde, 162–181. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Myagkov, Mikhail, Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shakin, Dimitri. 2005. Fraud or Fairytales: Russia and Ukraine’s Electoral Experience. Post-Soviet Affairs 21 (2):91–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myagkov, Mikhail, Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shakin, Dimitri. 2007. The Disappearance of Fraud: The Forensics of Ukraine’s 2006 Parliamentary Elections. Post-Soviet Affairs 23 (3):218–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myagkov, Mikhail, Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shakin, Dimitri. 2009. The Forensics of Election Fraud: Russia and Ukraine. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, David L. 1999. Perilous Proxy: Human Rights and the Presence of National Elections. Social Science Quarterly 80 (4):648–665.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2001. Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics 53 (3):325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenas, Arturas. 2013. Forcing Consent: Information and Power in Non-Democratic Elections. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1990. Modes of Statistical Inference For Causal Effects. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 25:279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schady, Norbert R. 2000. The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES), 1991–95 American Political Science Review 94 (2):289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002a. Elections Without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13 (2):36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002b. The Nested Game of Democratization by Elections. International Political Science Review 23 (1):103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2011. Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching Package for R. Journal of Statistical Software 42 (7):1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, Jung Seok. 2008. An Essay on Elections of Republic of Korea. Seoul: Yeoksabipyeongsa [in Korean].Google Scholar
Simpser, Alberto. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonn, Ho Chul. 2003. Modern Korean Politics: A History and Theory. Seoul, Korea: Sawhaepongron [in Korean].Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99 (3):315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2009. Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2):477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialisation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hong and Park Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Hong and Park Supplementary Material(File)
File 8.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hong and Park Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Hong and Park Supplementary Material(File)
File 3.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hong and Park Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Hong and Park Supplementary Material(File)
File 1.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Hong and Park Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Hong and Park Supplementary Material(File)
File 2.2 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Hong and Park Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Hong and Park Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 4.5 MB