Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:14:29.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conversionary Protestants Do Not Cause Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2020

Elena Nikolova Open the ORCID record for Elena Nikolova [Opens in a new window]  and
Jakub Polansky Open the ORCID record for Jakub Polansky [Opens in a new window]
Elena Nikolova*
Affiliation:
Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies-Regensburg, Central European Labor Studies Institute, and Global Labor Organization
Jakub Polansky
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In The Missionary Roots of Liberal Democracy, Robert D. Woodberry (2012) claims that conversionary Protestantism influenced the emergence of stable democracies around the world. While his historical analysis is exhaustive, the accompanying empirical evidence suffers from severe inconsistencies. This letter replicates Woodberry's analysis using twenty-six alternative democracy measures and extends the time period over which the democracy measures are averaged. These two simple modifications lead to the breakdown of Woodberry's results. We find no significant relationship between Protestant missions and the development of democracy, which raises concerns about the robustness and broader applicability of Woodberry's findings. The letter discusses some alternative explanations for Woodberry's results, which can inform future research on this topic.

Keywords

religiondemocracyconversionary ProtestantismChristianity
Type
Letter
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 1723 - 1733
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bai, Y and Kung, JK-S (2015) Diffusing knowledge while spreading God's message: Protestantism and economic prosperity in China, 1840–1920. Journal of the European Economic Association 13(4), 669–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, SO, Pfaff, S and Rubin, J (2016) Causes and consequences of the Protestant Reformation. Explorations in Economic History 62, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, SO and Woessmann, L (2009) Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of Protestant economic history. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(2), 531–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C, Miller, M and Rosato, S (2013) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46(12), 1523–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, KA (2001) Cross-national Indicators of Liberal Democracy, 1950–1990. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Bollen, KA (2009) Liberal democracy series I, 1972–1988: definition, measurement, and trajectories. Electoral Studies 28(3), 368–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Wang, H and Yan, S (2014) The long-term effects of Protestant activities in China. Peking University. Available at SSRN 2186818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caicedo, FV (2019) The mission: human capital transmission, economic persistence and culture in South America. Quarterly Journal of Economics 134(1), 507–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantoni, D, Dittmar, J and Yuchtman, N (2018) Religious competition and reallocation: the political economy of secularization in the Protestant reformation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(4), 2037–2096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Djankov, S and Nikolova, E (2018) Communism as the unhappy coming. Journal of Comparative Economics 46(3), 708–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedwab, R, Meier Zu Selhausen, F and Moradi, A (2018) The Economics of Missionary Expansion: Evidence from Africa and Implications for Development. Working Paper 7. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lankina, T and Getachew, L (2012) Mission or empire, word or sword? The human capital legacy in postcolonial democratic development. American Journal of Political Science 56(2), 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantovanelli, F (2014) The Protestant legacy: missions and literacy in India. Available at SSRN 2413170.Google Scholar
Nikolova, E, Polansky, J (2020) “Replication Data for: Conversionary Protestants do not cause democracy”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TRA0B6, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:WviHQ8m+0JWJHsL4PKNY9g== [fileUNF]Google Scholar
Nunn, N (2014) Gender and missionary influence in colonial Africa. In Akyeampong, E, Bates, R, Nunn, N and Robinson, JA (eds), Africa's Development in Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, P (2002) Social capital and democracy: an interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review 67(2), 254–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, P et al. (2003) A half-century of suffrage: new data and a comparative analysis. Studies in Comparative International Development 38(1), 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tusalem, RF (2009) The role of Protestantism in democratic consolidation among transitional states. Comparative Political Studies 42(7), 882–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldinger, M (2017) The long-run effects of missionary orders in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics 127, 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodberry, RD (2012) The missionary roots of liberal democracy. American Political Science Review 106(2), 244–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nikolova and Polansky supplementary material

Nikolova and Polansky supplementary material

Download Nikolova and Polansky supplementary material(File)
File 391.5 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Nikolova and Polansky Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TRA0B6
Link