Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:24:10.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sulphur as a nutrient for Merino sheep

1. Storage of sulphur in tissues and wool, and its secretion in milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. P. Langlands
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Physiology, Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
H. A. M. Sutherland
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Physiology, Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Faecal and urinary sulphur excretions of Merino sheep given fifty-one forage diets were measured in 205 balance experiments to derive estimates of the dietary requirements of Merino sheep for S.

2. Faecal S excretion varied with the S, organic matter and digestible organic matter intakes. Non-dietary faecal S excretion was estimated by regression analysis and was approximately 0·7 g S/kg organic-matter intake. Apparent S digestibility declined linearly with the reciprocal of dietary S content, and was predicted to be zero when the dietary S content was 0·81 g S/kg organic matter.

3. Both urinary S excretion and S retention varied with the digestible S and digestible organic-matter intakes. Endogenous urinary S excretion was taken to be the urinary S excretion when digestible S intake was zero, and the sheep was at zero energy balance. It was estimated by regression analysis to be 38 mg S/d.

4. The S and digestible S intakes necessary to maintain the fleece-free tissues in S equilibrium can be calculated from the equations derived in this study. An example is presented.

Type
General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1968). Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J. C., Robson, A. & Todd, J. (1963). Biochem. J. 87, 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard, S. L. & Mohammed, A. S. (1968). J. Nutr. 96, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Sutherland, H. A. M. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Sutherland, H. A. M. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Wheeler, J. L. (1968). Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 8, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, I. G., Kelly, H. J. & Sloan, R. E. (1953). Publs natn. Res. Coun., Wash. no. 254.Google Scholar
Mottershead, B. E. (1971). Lab. Pract. 20, 483.Google Scholar
Reis, P. J. & Schinckel, P. G. (1963). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 16, 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, P. J. & Tunks, D. A. (1968). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7, 402.Google Scholar
Roe, R. (1947). Bull. Coun. scient. ind. Res., Melb. no. 210. p. 26.Google Scholar
Simmonds, D. H. (1955). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 8, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. E., Loosli, J. K., Williams, H. H. & Maynard, L. A. (1951). J. Nutr. 43, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, W. C. & Rendig, V. V. (1954). J. Nutr. 54, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whanger, P. D. & Matrone, G. (1965). Biochim. biophys. Acta 98, 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar