Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:39:54.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rates of rumen fermentation in relation to ammonia concentration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Z. Mehrez ,
E. R. Ørskov  and
I. McDonald
A. Z. Mehrez
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
I. McDonald
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Four sheep were fed from automatic continuous feeders on whole barley fortified with graded levels of a urea solution. This approach was to a large extent successful in maintaining relatively steady states of rumen ammonia concentration.

2. Rates of barley fermentation in the rumen at various rumen NH3 concentrations were assessed by measuring the disappearance of barley dry matter from polyester bags suspended in the rumen of these sheep.

3. The minimal NH3 concentration for maximal rate of fermentation was estimated as 235 mg/l rumen fluid.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , November 1977 , pp. 437 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Allison, M. J. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 456 [Phillipson, A. T. editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Campling, R. C. (1962). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 32, 669.Google Scholar
Bryant, M. P. & Robinson, I. M. (1961). Appl. Microbiol. 9, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). Analyst, Lond. 95, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C., Hobson, P. N. & Summers, R. (1969). In Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on the Continuous Cultivation of Micro-organisms, pp. 189–204. [Malik, I. editor]. Prague: Czeckoslovakia. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hume, I. D., Moir, R. J. & Somers, M. (1970). Aust. J. agric. Res. 21, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1976). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 40A.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1977). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88, 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 79.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. & McDonald, I. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. & McDonald, I. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Smart, R. & Mehrez, A. Z. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 83, 299.Google Scholar
Satter, L. D. & Slyter, L. L. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R., Cooke, G. H. & Chapman, B. T. (1967). Automation in Analytical Chemistry, Technicon Symposium, Vol. 2, p. 377. Basingstoke, Hants: Technicon Instruments Co. Ltd.Google Scholar