Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:59:13.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rate of passage of digesta in sheep

3.* Differential rates of passage of water and dry matter from the reticulo-rumen, abomasum and caecum and proximal colon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

W. L. Grovum  and
V. J. Williams
W. L. Grovum
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
V. J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Three groups of sheep receiving 400, 800 and 1200 g lucerne chaff/d in equal hourly meals were killed. The large intestines were removed and divided into segments 15 cm long to provide information on the amounts and dry-matter contents of digesta and on the rates of passage of digesta and absorption of water along the large intestine.

2. With increasing intakes of food, increases were observed along the entire large intestine in the amounts of wet digesta present, in the transit rates of digesta and in the rates of absorption of water. The mean retention time of digesta in the large intestine decreased with increasing food intake, being 1737, 1056 and 692 min respectively.

3. Four patterns of sodium and potassium concentrations in digesta water along the large intestine were found.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , September 1973 , pp. 231 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Balch, C. C. (1950). Br. J. Nutr. 4, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berehoiu, G. V. (1966). Vet. Bull., Weybridge 36, Abstr. 4948.Google Scholar
Bullen, J. J., Scarisbrick, R. & Maddock, A. (1953). J. Path. Bact. 65, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Freer, M. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1961). Br. J. Nutr. 15, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. (1956). Br. J. Nutr. 10, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. A., McKenna, R. D. & Beck, I. T. (1968). Gut 9, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). Br.J. Nutr. 18, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukes, H. H. (1955). The Physiology of Domestic Animals p. 430. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, W. C. & Huston, J. E. (1968). J. Nutr. 95, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GrovumW. I., W. I., & Hecker, J. F. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, J. F. (1971). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes p. 208. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huston, J. E. & Ellis, W. C. (1968). J. agric. Fd Chem. 16, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydén, S. (1961). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant p. 35 [Lewis, D., editor]. london: Butterworths.Google Scholar
James, A. H. (1957). In The Physiology of Gastric Digestion p. 2. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.Google Scholar
Jarrett, I. G. (1948). J. Coun. science. ind. Res. Aust. 21, 311.Google Scholar
King, K. W. & Moore, W. E. C. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAnally, R. A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1944). Biol. Rev. 19, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. K., Moss, B. R., Hall, R. F. & Gorman, G. M. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. K., Perry, S. C., Chandler, P. T. & Cragle, R. G. (1967). J. Dairy Sci. 50, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Cowper, J. L. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylrea, P. J. (1966). Res. Vet. Sci. 7, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. & Ash, R. W. (1965). In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant p. 97 [Dougherty, R. W., editor] Washington, DC: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. (1970). J. Physiol., Lond. 210, 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalk, A. F. & Amadon, K. S. (1928). Bull. N. Dak. agric. Exp. Stn no. 216.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. & Hill, W. B. (1967). Rep. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy.. p. 132.Google Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. (1969). Vet. Rec. 84, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, R. A., Pilgrim, A. F. & Gray, F. V. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1968). Aust. J. agvic. Res. 19, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, H. S. & Dawson, A. M. (1961). Gut 2, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar