Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:46:11.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulse grain consumption and obesity: effects on energy expenditure, substrate oxidation, body composition, fat deposition and satiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2012

Christopher P. F. Marinangeli
Affiliation:
Kellogg Canada Inc. 5350Creekbank Rd. Mississauga, ON, CanadaL4W 5S1
Peter J. H. Jones*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Richardson Centre for Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals, 196 Innovation Drive, Winnipeg, MB, CanadaR3T 2N2
*
*Corresponding author: Dr P. J. H. Jones, fax +1 204 474 7552, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pulses have been identified as important components of a healthy diet. Assessment of pulse grains' nutritional composition alongside data from available preclinical and clinical trials suggests that pulses can modulate biological processes that lead to obesity. Components of pulse grains, including pulse-derived fibre and resistant starch, have been shown to alter energy expenditure, substrate trafficking and fat oxidation as well as visceral adipose deposition. Although mechanistic studies are scarce, studies have indicated that fibres found in pulses can have an impact on the expression of genes that modulate metabolism. Arginine and glutamine may produce thermogenic effects as major components of pulse grain proteins. Finally, evidence suggests that pulse-derived fibres, trypsin inhibitors and lectins may reduce food intake by inducing satiety via facilitating and prolonging cholecystokinin secretion. Nonetheless, the aforementioned data remain controversial and associations between dietary pulse grains and energy intake require further study. Given the available evidence, it can be concluded that pulses could be useful as functional foods and food ingredients that combat obesity.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Encompassing lentils, chickpeas, beans and peas, pulses are dry leguminous grains that contain one to twelve edible seeds enclosed in a pod. High in protein, fibre and antioxidants as well as low in fat, they have been established as foods that facilitate health and well-being(Reference Leterme1). Research investigating the physiological benefits of pulse grain consumption has focused on the ability for pulses and their components to modulate clinical endpoints such as postprandial and fasting glycaemia, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and TAG levels, as well as blood pressure(Reference Jenkins, Wolever and Jenkins2Reference Aluko6). However, given that obesity and ectopic/visceral fat deposition are risk factors in the development of metabolic abnormalities that contribute to dyslipidaemia and diabetes, it is unfortunate that the physiological impact of pulse grains on processes that may have an impact on obesity and waistline fat deposition has not received the same reception as their effects on other clinical endpoints described above.

Outside a genetic predisposition and the side effects of prescription medications, weight gain and obesity are artifacts of energy imbalance, with individuals consuming more energy than expended via the thermic effect of food, non-exercise thermogenesis and physical activity. Indeed, pharmacological interventions that target energy expenditure are gaining popularity(Reference Tseng, Cypess and Kahn7). Nonetheless, preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that pulses could prove useful as functional foods that modulate biological processes that facilitate obesity, including thermogenesis, postprandial substrate trafficking/oxidation, visceral adipose deposition and satiety.

The purpose of this review is to discuss the available evidence and possible mechanisms of action by which pulse grain consumption could beneficially influence energy metabolism. Given that, compared with glycaemia and dyslipidaemia, the anti-obesity effects of pulse grains are scarce, the present review will facilitate new hypotheses to be evolved that pursue how pulses and their fractions target satiety and related facets of metabolism that lead to excess weight gain.

Effects of pulse grains on energy expenditure and substrate utilisation

Evidence is emerging to support that pulse grains modulate the gastrointestinal microbiome and facilitate the production of bacteria-derived bioactives which alter energy expenditure, substrate trafficking and substrate oxidation. Pulses are an excellent source of soluble and insoluble fibres. The fermentation of fibre by gastro-microbiota produces SCFA, specifically butyric acid, which can be absorbed from the large intestine and alter hepatic and muscle metabolism. For example, one study showed that when rat faeces were inoculated with pea-derived fibre, butyric acid was the most prominent SCFA produced(Reference Stark and Madar8). In vitro fermentation of indigestible fractions of pulse grains by human microbiota demonstrated that, compared with chickpeas and a raffinose control, black beans and lentils facilitated the highest production of microbe-derived butyric acid(Reference Hernandez-Salazar, Osorio-Diaz and Loarca-Pina9). Similarly, rats fed diets containing 25 % adzuki, kintoki or tebou beans significantly increased caecal butyric acid concentrations compared with a control diet rich in ‘cornstarch’(Reference Han, Fukushima and Shimizu10). In addition, levels of propanoic acid and acetic acid did not differ between the bean and control diets(Reference Han, Fukushima and Shimizu10). Butyric is a metabolically active SCFA. Mice supplemented with butyric acid demonstrated an increase in hepatic and muscle PPARγ coactivator α expression alongside enhanced hepatic and muscle energy expenditure, as well as fat oxidation, mitochondrial oxidation and biogenesis(Reference Gao, Yin and Zhang11). In addition, butyric acid has been shown to modulate hepatic trafficking of carbohydrates by increasing glycogen storage and decreasing glycolysis(Reference Anderson and Bridges12, Reference Beauvieux, Roumes and Robert13) (Fig. 1). Modulation of carbohydrate metabolism could increase hepatic fat oxidation if energy demands of the cell are high and/or less acetyl-CoA is available from carbohydrates.

Fig. 1 Pulse grains modulate thermogenesis, substrate trafficking and oxidation, as well as adipose tissue deposition. (1) Fermentation of pulse-derived fibres and resistant starch facilitates the production of SCFA such as butyrate. Butyrate has been shown to alter energy expenditure and fatty acid oxidation by promoting glycogen storage, decreasing glycolysis and increasing the expression of PPARγ coactivator α (Pgc-1α). (2) Cellulose and hemicellulose, two insoluble fibres found in pulses, have been shown to mitigate excess adipose deposition and weight gain, causing an increase in hepatic forkhead transcription factor (Foxa2) and PPARγ coactivator β (Pgc-1β) expression. Cellulose and hemicelluloses have also been shown to reduce the expression of adipose G-protein-coupled receptor-40 (Gpr40). De novo lipogenesis could also be reduced via decreased expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) secondary to low levels of refined sugars in pulse grains and blunted postprandial glucose responses. (3) Modulation of genes that facilitate increases in energy expenditure could also be secondary to the ability for pulses to induce changes in genes that facilitate energy expenditure and fat oxidation directly. (4) Pulse grains could contribute to the consumption of phyto-oestrogens that interact with oestrogen receptor α (ERα) which facilitate subcutaneous (SC) adipose deposition and reduce visceral adipose deposition. CHO, carbohydrates.

In addition to soluble and insoluble fibres, pulse grains also contain substantial levels of resistant starch (RS). RS is characterised as starch polysaccharides that avoid digestion in the small intestine and have been shown to be highly fermentable in the colon(Reference Robertson, Bickerton and Dennis14, Reference Weickert, Mohlig and Koebnick15). In a recent review, Chibbar et al. (Reference Chibbar, Ambigaipalan and Hoover16) indicate that some beans contain 10–20 % RS. In vivo fermentation of pulse-derived RS was shown to predominately increase the levels of butyric acid(Reference Mahadevamma, Shamala and Tharanathan17). Recently, Higgins et al. (Reference Higgins, Higbee and Donahoo18) demonstrated that diets containing RS increased endogenous fat oxidation and suggested that carbohydrate metabolism could have been modulated via the SCFA-based mechanisms described above. Given the products of pulse-derived fibre and RS fermentation, evidence suggests that pulse grains could modulate macronutrient metabolism and increase fat oxidation.

Within vegetarian populations, pulses exist as a major source of dietary protein. The high protein content of pulse grains suggests that pulses could increase energy expenditure directly because, compared with carbohydrate diets, protein produces the highest thermic effect of food secondary to the energetic costs associated with dietary peptide catabolism, protein synthesis and gluconeogenesis(Reference Robinson, Jaccard and Persaud19Reference Krebs, Brehm and Krssak21). Abete et al. (Reference Abete, Parra and Martinez22) showed that human subjects consuming legume-rich diets for 8 weeks demonstrated increased mitochondrial oxidation, contributing to greater weight loss compared with controls. In addition, enhancements in mitochondrial oxidation were similar to individuals consuming diets high in animal-based protein(Reference Abete, Parra and Martinez22). Furthermore, high-legume diets induced the greatest reductions in LDL-cholesterol levels, suggesting that a protein-rich diet that modulates metabolism does not need to incorporate protein sources that are high in saturated fats and cholesterol which promote hypercholesterolaemia. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the Abete et al. study does not specify the proportion of legumes in the diet comprised of pulses. Unpublished indirect calorimetry data from our laboratory have demonstrated that hamsters fed diets containing 10 % whole pea flour at the expense of ‘cornstarch’ consumed higher levels of oxygen compared with controls. However, given that diets were fairly isonitrogenous, we postulated that the amino acid composition could have facilitated an increase in energy expenditure. Published amino acid profiles of yellow peas(Reference Pownall, Udenigwe and Aluko23) suggest that the whole pea diets fed to hamsters contained approximately 24 % higher arginine levels compared with the control diet. Arginine has been shown to possess thermogenic properties which enhance carbohydrate and fat oxidation via increased mitochondrial biogenesis and the modulation of genes that regulate energy expenditure(Reference McKnight, Satterfield and Jobgen24). In addition, analysis of protein meal, protein concentrate and protein isolates of peas, faba beans and lentils has demonstrated that arginine is a major amino acid constituent of pulse-derived protein at 9·7–11·1, 10·5–12·0 and 11·3–11·0 g/16 g N, respectively(Reference Bhatty and Christison25). In addition to arginine, peas, faba beans and lentils also contain substantial amounts of glutamine at approximately 15·0 g/16 g N(Reference Bhatty and Christison25), which has been shown to increase postprandial energy expenditure by 49 % in human subjects(Reference Iwashita, Mikus and Baier26). Iwashita et al. (Reference Iwashita, Mikus and Baier26) demonstrated that glutamine initially enhanced postprandial carbohydrate oxidation up to 180 min after a test meal while fat oxidation was enhanced after 210 min. It has been suggested that glutamine can improve insulin-mediated glucose disposal during the early postprandial period. Thus, reduced levels of carbohydrate would be available during the latter postprandial period and force cells to rely on fat as a source of energy(Reference Iwashita, Mikus and Baier26). Modern-day food processing techniques such as fractionation allow for isolation and concentration of pulse-derived proteins for future use in studies examining the direct effects of pulse grain peptides on thermogenesis.

Pulse grains and fat deposition

Excess waistline adipose deposition is primarily visceral/ectopic fat and is an independent risk factor for CVD, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome(Reference Carey, Jenkins and Campbell27, Reference Tanko and Christiansen28). Thus, by shifting fat deposition away from visceral fat depots and into subcutaneous adipose tissue, risk factors related to excess weight could decline before weight loss. Although human clinical trial data are still forthcoming in examining the effects of pulse consumption on regional fat deposition, animal studies have suggested a beneficial effect. Rats consuming a high-fat diet with added chickpeas demonstrated similar energy intake compared with high fat-fed rats and increased energy consumption compared with rats on normal-fat diets(Reference Yang, Zhou and Gu29). Nonetheless, chickpeas significantly reduced epididymal fat deposition, a measure of visceral adipose tissue, compared with high fat-fed controls. Moreover, rats receiving chickpeas demonstrated similar levels of epididymal fat mass v. normal fat-fed rats. A reduction in epididymal fat deposition in rats receiving chickpeas was also reflected in decreased leptin mRNA expression. In addition, compared with the high-fat diet, chickpeas decreased muscle and hepatic TAG levels by 39 and 23 %, respectively(Reference Yang, Zhou and Gu29). Chickpea-enriched diets also normalised the activities of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic TAG lipase, as well as decreased lipoprotein lipase mRNA expression and postprandial glycaemic responses to levels that were similar to animals consuming normal levels of dietary fat(Reference Yang, Zhou and Gu29). In another study, despite identical energy intakes, rats fed diets containing mung beans demonstrated a 48 % reduction in retroperitoneal adipose tissue mass, a visceral fat depot, compared with control diets(Reference Morris and Zemel30). Moreover, mung beans were shown to induce a 40 % reduction in circulating leptin levels and a 62 % reduction in hepatic fatty acid synthase expression(Reference Morris and Zemel30). Researchers(Reference Morris and Zemel30) suggest that reduced levels of refined sugars and blunted postprandial glucose responses with mung bean diets could have blunted fatty acid synthase expression. SCFA from the fermentation of pulse-derived fibres could also modulate adipose deposition. In the study described above by Gao et al. (Reference Gao, Yin and Zhang11), butyric acid-induced enhancements in energy expenditure and fat oxidation prevented obesity in high fat-fed mice. Finally, a human clinical trial using whole pea flour as a dietary intervention, alongside an energy-controlled paradigm that prevented fluctuations in weight, demonstrated a significant reduction in android:gynoid fat ratios in women, indicating that fat deposition was directed away from the waistline area(Reference Marinangeli and Jones31).

The bioactive components of pulse grains that induce shifts in adipose tissue deposition are unknown. As described above, insoluble fibre is the primary fibre type found in pulses(Reference Tosh and Yada32). Fibre compositional analysis of pulses is scarce; however, yellow pea hulls consist primarily of cellulose (69 %), hemicellulose (7·5 %) and lignin (1·4 %)(Reference Reichert33). A recent study investigating the metabolic effects of insoluble fibres containing primarily cellulose and hemicellulose showed an increase in the expression of forkhead transcription factor (Foxa2) and PPARγ coactivator β (Pgc-1β), two genes that facilitate hepatic fat oxidation(Reference Isken, Klaus and Osterhoff34). In addition, compared with soluble fibre, mice consuming insoluble fibre demonstrated reduced adiposity despite no differences in dietary energy intake, digested energy or faecal energy output(Reference Isken, Klaus and Osterhoff34). Although researchers hypothesise that modulation of Foxa2 and Pgc-1β could be secondary to reduced weight gain and insulin resistance among insoluble fibre-fed mice, they do not discard the possibility of insoluble fibre having a direct effect on gene expression(Reference Isken, Klaus and Osterhoff34). Finally, insoluble fibre attenuated the expression of G-protein-coupled receptor-40(Reference Isken, Klaus and Osterhoff34), a G-coupled protein that is associated with obesity-induced hyperinsulinaemia, impaired glucose tolerance and hepatic glucose output(Reference Steneberg, Rubins and Bartoov-Shifman35). Data suggest that pulse grain-derived insoluble fibres could either directly or indirectly, via the production of microbe-derived bioactives, modulate visceral adiposity (Fig. 1).

Pulse grain-derived phyto-oestrogens could also contribute to the modulation of adipose deposition via their interaction with oestrogen receptors (ER). Phyto-oestrogens are plant-derived compounds that mimic the actions of human oestrogen, but with less potency(Reference Horn-Ross36). Regional fat deposition is, in part, regulated by sex hormones and their affinity for appropriate receptors dispersed throughout visceral and subcutaneous adipose(Reference Pallottini, Bulzomi and Galluzzo37). In fact, stimulation of ERα and ERβ decreases and increases subcutaneous adipose lipolysis, respectively(Reference Pallottini, Bulzomi and Galluzzo37). Thus, stimulation of specific ER with phyto-oestrogens could give rise to a healthier regional adipose profile. The most well-known phyto-oestrogens are genistein and daidzein, which are primarily soya-derived and not found in significant concentrations in pulse grains. Compared with ERα, the soya-derived phyto-oestrogen genistein has been shown to have a higher affinity for ERβ (Reference Morito, Hirose and Kinjo38). In one study by Sites et al. (Reference Sites, Cooper and Toth39), it has been hypothesised that the significant reduction in subcutaneous adipose tissue in postmenopausal women could have been secondary to the stimulatory effects of soya-derived phyto-oestrogens on ERβ. The lignan secoisolariciresinol is a phyto-oestrogen that is found in some pulses. Metabolism of secoisolariciresinol involves its conversion to enterolactone by gastrointestinal microflora. Contrary to genistein, enterolactone preferentially binds to ERα(Reference Penttinen, Jaehrling and Damdimopoulos40). Furthermore, compared with men, females express higher levels of ERα in subcutaneous adipose(Reference Richelsen41, Reference Rodriguez-Cuenca, Monjo and Proenza42) and ERα favours subcutaneous adipose deposition(Reference Richelsen41, Reference Pedersen, Kristensen and Hermann43). Recently, Morisset et al. (Reference Morisset, Lemieux and Veilleux44) showed that, despite no difference in subcutaneous adiposity, postmenopausal women with the highest concentrations of circulating enterolactone have reduced visceral adiposity and waist circumferences compared with women with low levels of circulating enterolactone. Reduced visceral adipose deposition was accompanied by a decrease in hyperinsulinaemia and impaired glucose tolerance, as well as increased glucose disposal(Reference Morisset, Lemieux and Veilleux44). Published analysis of secoisolariciresinol levels in legumes/pulses indicates that kidney beans and black gram sprouts contain the highest levels of secoisolariciresinol at 153 and 468 μg/100 g, respectively(Reference Mazur45). Comparatively, levels of secoisolariciresinol in pulses are far below those of flax seeds (approximately 369 900 μg/100 g)(Reference Mazur45). However, it is unlikely that individuals, especially in North America, will consume upwards of 100 g/d flax. Thus, specific pulse grains could contribute to secoisolariciresinol intake and promote a healthier adipose phenotype among women.

Effects of pulse grains on satiety

A reduction in overall energy intake and a reduction in overall energy balance are ultimately the most effective means of reducing adiposity. Studies have demonstrated that pulse grains modulate satiety (Fig. 2). While controlling the subject's background diet, one study has revealed that chickpea flour increased satiety with volunteers feeling fewer cravings for sweet and fatty foods(Reference Pittaway, Ahuja and Robertson46). Recently, subjects consuming at least 1200 g/week canned chickpeas for 12 weeks reported a significant increase in satiety compared with when they consumed their habitual diet(Reference Murty, Pittaway and Ball47). However, despite an increase in dietary fibre intake, no differences in total energy intake were observed(Reference Murty, Pittaway and Ball47). Similar results were described by Wong et al. (Reference Wong, Mollard and Zafar48) where, although various preparations of navy beans reduced appetite, compared with controls, there was no difference in cumulative food intake 120 min following a pizza meal. The fact that appetite was reduced, but overall energy intake was not deterred with pulse grain consumption emphasises the psychological component of eating, whereby satiety signals are not always effective when unlimited food is available. Moreover, Johnson et al. (Reference Johnson, Thomas and Hall49) showed that regular and extruded chickpea flours had no effect on satiety. The authors suggest that the dose of chickpea flours could have been insufficient to mitigate volunteers' desire to eat. Assuming that sufficient quantities are consumed, available evidence is in support of pulse grains' ability to induce satiety.

Fig. 2 Mechanisms by which pulse grains could induce secretion of cholecystokinin. (1) Pulse grain fibres increase and prolong cholecystokinin (CCK) secretion by inducing gastric distension (GD) and decreasing the rate of gastric emptying, respectively. Decreasing the rate of gastric emptying can also prolong CCK secretion. (2) Pulse grain-derived lectins and trypsin inhibitors increase CCK secretion directly.

Physiological signals that stimulate satiety are not completely understood(Reference de Graaf, Blom and Smeets50). However, given the nutritional composition of pulse grains, hypotheses surrounding the mechanisms by which these dietary ingredients induce satiety can be formulated. In addition to dietary protein and fat, gastric distention induces the secretion cholecystokinin (CCK), a duodenum-derived hormone that delays gastric emptying and modulates satiety by interacting with receptors on the vagus nerve(Reference Moran, Baldessarini and Salorio51, Reference Degen, Matzinger and Drewe52). High-fibre foods are believed to stimulate and prolong CCK secretion by facilitating gastric distention and slowing the rate of gastric emptying(Reference Santangelo, Peracchi and Conte53), respectively. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesise that appropriate dosages of pulse grain fibres can stimulate CCK release(Reference de Graaf, Blom and Smeets50). When added to a mixed meal, high-fibre bean flakes have been shown to increase satiety(Reference Leathwood and Pollet54) and CCK levels(Reference Bourdon, Olson and Backus55) compared with potato purée and rice with skimmed milk, respectively. Researchers suggest that trypsin inhibitors found in the bean flakes may also stimulate CCK release directly(Reference Bourdon, Olson and Backus55). Stimulation of CCK secretion by trypsin inhibitors has been demonstrated in the literature using soya(Reference Lu, Anderson and Gomez56, Reference Grant, Alonso and Edwards57). In addition, consumption of bean-derived lectins, another class of anti-nutritional compounds found in pulses(Reference Champ58), has been shown to increase CCK secretion, compared with controls fed lactalbumin(Reference Herzig, Bardocz and Grant59). Similar results have been demonstrated when rats were fed kidney beans or had kidney bean-derived lectins infused into their duodenum(Reference Grant, Alonso and Edwards57). Overall, the fibre and anti-nutritional bioactive content of pulse grains could work in concert to facilitate CCK secretion and induce satiety. Nonetheless, future studies are needed to investigate the effects of whole pulse grains or their components on satiety and the secretion of satiety-modulating hormones such as ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1 and peptide YY.

Conclusions

The present review discusses existing evidence concerning the use of pulse grains as functional foods that modulate weight gain and obesity. Available data suggest that pulse grains possess bioactives that modulate the physiological responses that facilitate obesity, such as energy expenditure, substrate trafficking and oxidation, lipid deposition and satiety. However, given that the satiating effects of pulse grains do not necessarily facilitate a reduction in food/energy intake, further research investigating associations between satiety, pulse grains and obesity is required. It is our hope that the present review will foster the development of new hypotheses and initiate the development of future studies that investigate pulse grains' efficacy and their mechanisms of action as to how these functional food ingredients aid in the dietary management of obesity.

Acknowledgements

C. P. F. M. and P. J. H. J. were responsible for conceptualising and writing the present review. Neither of the authors has any conflict of interest. No funding was received for producing the present review.

References

1Leterme, P (2002) Recommendations by health organizations for pulse consumption. Br J Nutr 88, Suppl. 3, S239S242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Jenkins, DJ, Wolever, TM, Jenkins, AL, et al. (1983) The glycaemic index of foods tested in diabetic patients: a new basis for carbohydrate exchange favouring the use of legumes. Diabetologia 24, 257264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Tovar, J, Granfeldt, Y & Bjorck, I (1992) Effect of processing on blood glucose and insulin responses to starch in legumes. J Agric Food Chem 40, 18461851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Anderson, JW & Major, AW (2002) Pulses and lipaemia, short- and long-term effect: potential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Br J Nutr 88, Suppl. 3, S263S271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Venn, BJ & Mann, JI (2004) Cereal grains, legumes and diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 14431461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Aluko, RE (2008) Determination of nutritional and bioactive properties of peptides in enzymatic pea, chickpea, and mung bean protein hydrolysates. J AOAC Int 91, 947956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Tseng, YH, Cypess, AM & Kahn, CR (2010) Cellular bioenergetics as a target for obesity therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9, 465481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Stark, AH & Madar, Z (1993) In vitro production of short-chain fatty acids by bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber compared with effects of those fibers on hepatic sterol synthesis in rats. J Nutr 123, 21662173.Google ScholarPubMed
9Hernandez-Salazar, M, Osorio-Diaz, P, Loarca-Pina, G, et al. (2010) In vitro fermentability and antioxidant capacity of the indigestible fraction of cooked black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), lentils (Lens culinaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). J Sci Food Agric 90, 14171422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Han, KH, Fukushima, M, Shimizu, K, et al. (2003) Resistant starches of beans reduce the serum cholesterol concentration in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 49, 281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Gao, Z, Yin, J, Zhang, J, et al. (2009) Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes 58, 15091517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Anderson, JW & Bridges, SR (1984) Short-chain fatty acid fermentation products of plant fiber affect glucose metabolism of isolated rat hepatocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 177, 372376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Beauvieux, MC, Roumes, H, Robert, N, et al. (2008) Butyrate ingestion improves hepatic glycogen storage in the re-fed rat. BMC Physiol 8, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Robertson, MD, Bickerton, AS, Dennis, AL, et al. (2005) Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 559567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Weickert, MO, Mohlig, M, Koebnick, C, et al. (2005) Impact of cereal fibre on glucose-regulating factors. Diabetologia 48, 23432353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Chibbar, RN, Ambigaipalan, P & Hoover, R (2010) Molecular diversity in pulse seed starch and complex carbohydrates and its role in human nutrition and health. Cereal Chem 87, 342352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Mahadevamma, S, Shamala, TR & Tharanathan, RN (2004) Resistant starch derived from processed legumes: in vitro and in vivo fermentation characteristics. Int J Food Sci Nutr 55, 399405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Higgins, JA, Higbee, DR, Donahoo, WT, et al. (2004) Resistant starch consumption promotes lipid oxidation. Nutr Metab (Lond) 1, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Robinson, SM, Jaccard, C, Persaud, C, et al. (1990) Protein turnover and thermogenesis in response to high-protein and high-carbohydrate feeding in men. Am J Clin Nutr 52, 7280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Westerterp, KR, Wilson, SA & Rolland, V (1999) Diet induced thermogenesis measured over 24 h in a respiration chamber: effect of diet composition. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23, 287292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Krebs, M, Brehm, A, Krssak, M, et al. (2003) Direct and indirect effects of amino acids on hepatic glucose metabolism in humans. Diabetologia 46, 917925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Abete, I, Parra, D & Martinez, JA (2009) Legume-, fish-, or high-protein-based hypocaloric diets: effects on weight loss and mitochondrial oxidation in obese men. J Med Food 12, 100108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Pownall, TL, Udenigwe, CC & Aluko, RE (2010) Amino acid composition and antioxidant properties of pea seed (Pisum sativum L.) enzymatic protein hydrolysate fractions. J Agric Food Chem 58, 47124718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24McKnight, JR, Satterfield, MC, Jobgen, WS, et al. (2010) Beneficial effects of l-arginine on reducing obesity: potential mechanisms and important implications for human health. Amino Acids 39, 349357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Bhatty, RS & Christison, GI (1984) Composition and nutritional quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L. spp. minor) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) meals, protein concentrates and isolates. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 34, 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Iwashita, S, Mikus, C, Baier, S, et al. (2006) Glutamine supplementation increases postprandial energy expenditure and fat oxidation in humans. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 30, 7680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Carey, DG, Jenkins, AB, Campbell, LV, et al. (1996) Abdominal fat and insulin resistance in normal and overweight women: direct measurements reveal a strong relationship in subjects at both low and high risk of NIDDM. Diabetes 45, 633638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Tanko, LB & Christiansen, C (2006) Adipose tissue, insulin resistance and low-grade inflammation: implications for atherogenesis and the cardiovascular harm of estrogen plus progestogen therapy. Climacteric 9, 169180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Yang, Y, Zhou, L, Gu, Y, et al. (2007) Dietary chickpeas reverse visceral adiposity, dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance in rats induced by a chronic high-fat diet. Br J Nutr 98, 720726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Morris, KL & Zemel, MB (2005) Effect of dietary carbohydrate source on the development of obesity in agouti transgenic mice. Obes Res 13, 2135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Marinangeli, CP & Jones, PJ (2011) Whole and fractionated yellow pea flours reduce fasting insulin and insulin resistance in hypercholesterolaemic and overweight human subjects. Br J Nutr 105, 110117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Tosh, SM & Yada, S (2010) Dietary fibres in pulse seeds and fractions: characterization, functional attributes, and applications. Food Res Int 43, 450460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Reichert, RD (1981) Quantitative isolation and estimation of cell-wall material from dehulled pea (Pisum sativum) flours and concentrates. Cereal Chem 58, 266270.Google Scholar
34Isken, F, Klaus, S, Osterhoff, M, et al. (2010) Effects of long-term soluble vs. insoluble dietary fiber intake on high-fat diet-induced obesity in C57BL/6J mice. J Nutr Biochem 21, 278284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Steneberg, R, Rubins, N, Bartoov-Shifman, R, et al. (2005) The FFA receptor GPR40 links hyperinsulinemia, hepatic steatosis, and impaired glucose homeostasis in mouse. Cell Metab 1, 245258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Horn-Ross, PL (1995) Phytoestrogens, body composition, and breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 6, 567573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Pallottini, V, Bulzomi, P, Galluzzo, P, et al. (2008) Estrogen regulation of adipose tissue functions: involvement of estrogen receptor isoforms. Infect Disord Drug Targets 8, 5260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Morito, K, Hirose, T, Kinjo, J, et al. (2001) Interaction of phytoestrogens with estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Biol Pharm Bull 24, 351356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Sites, CK, Cooper, BC, Toth, MJ, et al. (2007) Effect of a daily supplement of soy protein on body composition and insulin secretion in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 88, 16091617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Penttinen, P, Jaehrling, J, Damdimopoulos, AE, et al. (2007) Diet-derived polyphenol metabolite enterolactone is a tissue-specific estrogen receptor activator. Endocrinology 148, 48754886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Richelsen, B (1986) Increased alpha 2 −  but similar beta-adrenergic receptor activities in subcutaneous gluteal adipocytes from females compared with males. Eur J Clin Invest 16, 302309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Rodriguez-Cuenca, S, Monjo, M, Proenza, AM, et al. (2005) Depot differences in steroid receptor expression in adipose tissue: possible role of the local steroid milieu. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288, E200E207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Pedersen, SB, Kristensen, K, Hermann, PA, et al. (2004) Estrogen controls lipolysis by up-regulating alpha2A-adrenergic receptors directly in human adipose tissue through the estrogen receptor alpha. Implications for the female fat distribution. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89, 18691878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Morisset, AS, Lemieux, S, Veilleux, A, et al. (2009) Impact of a lignan-rich diet on adiposity and insulin sensitivity in post-menopausal women. Br J Nutr 102, 195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Mazur, W (1998) Phytoestrogen content in foods. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 12, 729742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Pittaway, JK, Ahuja, KD, Robertson, IK, et al. (2007) Effects of a controlled diet supplemented with chickpeas on serum lipids, glucose tolerance, satiety and bowel function. J Am Coll Nutr 26, 334340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Murty, CM, Pittaway, JK & Ball, MJ (2010) Chickpea supplementation in an Australian diet affects food choice, satiety and bowel health. Appetite 54, 282288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Wong, CL, Mollard, RC, Zafar, TA, et al. (2009) Food intake and satiety following a serving of pulses in young men: effect of processing, recipe, and pulse variety. J Am Coll Nutr 28, 543552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Johnson, SK, Thomas, SJ & Hall, RS (2005) Palatability and glucose, insulin and satiety responses of chickpea flour and extruded chickpea flour bread eaten as part of a breakfast. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 169176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50de Graaf, C, Blom, WA, Smeets, PA, et al. (2004) Biomarkers of satiation and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 946961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Moran, TH, Baldessarini, AR, Salorio, CF, et al. (1997) Vagal afferent and efferent contributions to the inhibition of food intake by cholecystokinin. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272, R1245R1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Degen, L, Matzinger, D, Drewe, J, et al. (2001) The effect of cholecystokinin in controlling appetite and food intake in humans. Peptides 22, 12651269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Santangelo, A, Peracchi, M, Conte, D, et al. (1998) Physical state of meal affects gastric emptying, cholecystokinin release and satiety. Br J Nutr 80, 521527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Leathwood, P & Pollet, P (1988) Effects of slow release carbohydrates in the form of bean flakes on the evolution of hunger and satiety in man. Appetite 10, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Bourdon, I, Olson, B, Backus, R, et al. (2001) Beans, as a source of dietary fiber, increase cholecystokinin and apolipoprotein b48 response to test meals in men. J Nutr 131, 14851490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Lu, LJW, Anderson, KE, Gomez, G, et al. (1995) Decreased plasma levels of cholecystokinin in healthy males after chronic ingestion of a heat-treated soya product. Cancer Lett 90, 149155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Grant, G, Alonso, R, Edwards, JE, et al. (2000) Dietary soya beans and kidney beans stimulate secretion of cholecystokinin and pancreatic digestive enzymes in 400-day-old Hooded-Lister rats but only soya beans induce growth of the pancreas. Pancreas 20, 305312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Champ, MM (2002) Non-nutrient bioactive substances of pulses. Br J Nutr 88, Suppl. 3, S307S319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Herzig, KH, Bardocz, S, Grant, G, et al. (1997) Red kidney bean lectin is a potent cholecystokinin releasing stimulus in the rat inducing pancreatic growth. Gut 41, 333338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Pulse grains modulate thermogenesis, substrate trafficking and oxidation, as well as adipose tissue deposition. (1) Fermentation of pulse-derived fibres and resistant starch facilitates the production of SCFA such as butyrate. Butyrate has been shown to alter energy expenditure and fatty acid oxidation by promoting glycogen storage, decreasing glycolysis and increasing the expression of PPARγ coactivator α (Pgc-1α). (2) Cellulose and hemicellulose, two insoluble fibres found in pulses, have been shown to mitigate excess adipose deposition and weight gain, causing an increase in hepatic forkhead transcription factor (Foxa2) and PPARγ coactivator β (Pgc-1β) expression. Cellulose and hemicelluloses have also been shown to reduce the expression of adipose G-protein-coupled receptor-40 (Gpr40). De novo lipogenesis could also be reduced via decreased expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) secondary to low levels of refined sugars in pulse grains and blunted postprandial glucose responses. (3) Modulation of genes that facilitate increases in energy expenditure could also be secondary to the ability for pulses to induce changes in genes that facilitate energy expenditure and fat oxidation directly. (4) Pulse grains could contribute to the consumption of phyto-oestrogens that interact with oestrogen receptor α (ERα) which facilitate subcutaneous (SC) adipose deposition and reduce visceral adipose deposition. CHO, carbohydrates.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Mechanisms by which pulse grains could induce secretion of cholecystokinin. (1) Pulse grain fibres increase and prolong cholecystokinin (CCK) secretion by inducing gastric distension (GD) and decreasing the rate of gastric emptying, respectively. Decreasing the rate of gastric emptying can also prolong CCK secretion. (2) Pulse grain-derived lectins and trypsin inhibitors increase CCK secretion directly.