Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:14:37.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritive value of the winged bean (Psophocarpus palustris Desv.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2009

K. Černý ,
Maud Kordylas ,
F. Pospíšil ,
O. Švábenský  and
B. Zajíc
K. Černý
Affiliation:
National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Accra, Ghana
Maud Kordylas
Affiliation:
National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Accra, Ghana
F. Pospíšil
Affiliation:
University of Ghana, Agricultural Research Station, Kade, Ghana
O. Švábenský
Affiliation:
Czech Academy of Agriculture, Food Industry Research Institute, Prague, Czechoslovakia
B. Zajíc
Affiliation:
Czech Academy of Agriculture, Food Industry Research Institute, Prague, Czechoslovakia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The winged bean (Psophocarpus palustris Desv.) has been grown successfully for several seasons, on an experimental basis, in the forest belt of Ghana, where earlier attempts to grow the soya bean had proved unsatisfactory.

2. Although botanically different, the composition of the dry seeds was found to be very similar to that of the soya bean, containing 37·3% protein, 18·1% fat, 13·9 ppm thiamin and 1·8 ppm riboflavin. The oil of the seeds contained 125·9 mg tocopherol (γ + β) per 100 g. The amino acid composition of the protein was very similar to that of the soya bean, with methionine as the first-limiting amino acid. The content of unsaturated fatty acids and that of poly-unsaturated essential fatty acids were satisfactory.

Active trypsin inhibitor found in the raw seeds could be destroyed satisfactorily by moist heat. No urease activity was detected.

The protein efficiency ratio (PER) and net protein utilization (NPU) of the beans determined with rats, were superior to those of groundnuts. The supplementary value of the protein was shown by mixing two parts of the winged bean and three parts of maize flour. When adjusted to either 10% or 16% protein, the PER values of these mixtures were similar to those of skim milk. At the 16% protein level, addition of skim milk or 0·3% DL-methionine to this mixture produced only an insignificant improvement in PER value.

The pleasant, sweet taste even when in the raw state is one of the advantages of the winged bean. Although, it is a climber, and should be staked, its cultivation on a small scale in selected areas of Ghana is recommended.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , September 1971 , pp. 293 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Anson, M. L. & Northrop, J. H. (1936–1937). J. gen. Physiol. 20, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattná, J., Manoušková, J. & Davídek, J. (1967). Z. Lebensmittelunters. u. -Forsch. 134, 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, R. J. & Weiss, K. W. (1956). Amino Acid Handbook. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Bressani, R. & Elías, L. G. (1966). J. Fd Sci. 31, 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Černá, J. & Kočová, P. (1966). Prům. Potravin 17, 369.Google Scholar
Dische, Z. (1930). Microchemie 8, 4.Google Scholar
Drew Chemical Corp., Parsippany, N. J. (1970). Fd Engng 42, no. 5, p. 99.Google Scholar
FAO/WHO: Joint Expert Group on Protein Requirements (1965). Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 301.Google Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Stanley, G. H. S. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folin, O. & Ciocalteu, V. (1927). J. biol. Chem. 73, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegsted, D. M., Mills, R. C., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1941). J. biol. Chem. 138, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liener, I. E. (1962). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 11, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Bender, A. E. (1955). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, L., Sinclair, H. M. & Jelliffe, D. B. (1961). Tropical Nutrition and Dietetics 4th ed.London: Baillière, Tindal and Cox.Google Scholar
Pospíšil, F. & Černý, K. (1967). A. Rep. agric. Res. Stn, Kade, University of Ghana, Legon.Google Scholar
Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H. & Moore, S. (1958). Analyt. Chem. 30, 1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, J. B. & Somers, G. F. (1949). Laboratory Experiments in Biological Chemistry 2nd ed.New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Watt, B. K. & Merrill, A. (1963). Composition of Foods. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar