Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:12:10.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrient supply and growth of cattle offered straw-based diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Isabelle Ortigues ,
T. Smith ,
J. D. Oldham ,
A. B. McAllan  and
J. W. Siviter
Isabelle Ortigues
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
T. Smith
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
J. D. Oldham
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
A. B. McAllan
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
J. W. Siviter
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An experiment was conducted using steers cannulated at the rumen, duodenum and ileum to study the effects of increasing the levels of barley and fishmeal in straw-based diets. Diets A, B, C and D contained ammonia-treated straw, barley and fishmeal in the ratios, 67:33:0, 66:23:11, 53:47:0 and 52:36:12 (by weight) and were offered in daily amounts of 3·9, 3·9, 4·8 and 4·8 kg dry matter. The effects of barley were attributable to increased intakes of digestible organic matter and consequently to increased flows of microbial matter to the duodenum. There were no modifications in the balance of energy to nitrogen-yielding nutrients available for absorption. Introducing fishmeal into diets improved digestibility of cellulose and xylose by up to 6.7 and 4.7 % respectively, and shifted digestion towards the large intestine. Second, it increased amino acid N supply to the small intestine which averaged 52·2, 63·2, 68·8 and 84·0 g/d with diets A, B, C and D. Some changes were also noted in the balance of amino acids absorbed. Consequently, the contribution of amino acids to metabolizable energy intake increased with the proportion of fishmeal in diets (0·17, 0·20, 0·18 and 0·21 for diets A, B, C and D).

Growth rates measured in heifers amounted to 259, 431, 522 and 615 g/d for diets A, B, C and D. They appeared to be related to intestinal amino acid supply.

Keywords

GrowthNutrient supplyRuminant digestionCattle
Type
Nutrient Supply and Growth
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , November 1989 , pp. 601 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1989

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). Report of the Protein Group of the Agricultural Research Council Working Party on the Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Amaning-Kwarteng, K., Kellaway, R.C. & Kirby, A.C. (1986). Supplemental protein degradation, bacterial protein synthesis and nitrogen retention in sheep eating sodium hydroxide-treated straw. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 557–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, B.B., Busk, H., Chadwick, J.P., Cuthbertson, A., Fursey, G.A.J., Jones, D.W., Lewin, P., Miles, C.A. & Owen, M.G. (1982). EUR 7640. Ultrasonic Techniques for Describing Carcass Characteristics in Live Cattle. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Bergner, H., Bergner, U. & Simon, O. (1983). Measurement of 15N-amino acid excretion and endogenous N- secretion in 15N- and 14C-labelled pigs. In IVth International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, vol 2, pp. 339–342 [Arnal, M., Pion, R. and Bonin, D., editors]. Versailles: INRA.Google Scholar
Binnerts, W.T., Van't Klooster, A.T. & Frens, A.M. (1968). Soluble chromium indicator measured by atomic absorption in digestion experiments. Veterinary Record 82, 470Google Scholar
Brookes, T.A., Dew, A.M., Pike, B.V. & Roberts, C.J. (1984). Application of an automated enzymatic technique for the determination of non-esterified fatty acids in bovine blood. Veterinary Record 114, 421–423.Google Scholar
Buraczewski, S. (1986). Endogenous non-protein-nitrogen compounds in the intestinal tract of monogastric animals. Archive in Animal Nutrition 36, 274–281.Google Scholar
Buttery, P.J. & Foulds, A.N. (1985). Amino acid requirements of ruminants. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp. 257–271 [Haresign, W. & Cole, D.J.A., editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, H.L., Clapham, C. & Oldham, J.D. (1982). A design for flexible intestinal cannulas. Laboratory Animals 16, 307–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cotta, M.A. & Hespell, R.B. (1986). Protein and amino-acid metabolism of rumen bacteria. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 122–136 [Milligan, L.P., Grovum, W.L. & Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
Cottrill, B.R., Beever, D.E., Austin, A.R. & Osbourn, D.F. (1982). The effect of protein and non-protein nitrogen supplements to maize silage on total amino acid supply in young cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 527–541.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M. & Nolan, J.V. (1982). Studies of the large intestine of sheep. 1. Fermentation and absorption in sections of the large intestine. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, A.R. (1974). Protein-energy relationships in the digestion products of sheep fed on herbage diets differing in digestibility and nitrogen concentration. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 613–630.Google Scholar
Egan, A.R., Boda, K. & Varady, J. (1986). Regulation of nitrogen metabolism and recycling. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 386–402 [Milligan, L.P., Grovum, W.L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
Evans, C.C., MacRae, J.C. & Wilson, S. (1977). Determination of ruthenium and chromium by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and the use of inert ruthenium (II) phenanthroline as a solid phase marker in sheep digestion studies. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 17–22.Google Scholar
Faichney, G.J. (1975). The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 277–291 [McDonald, I.W. and Warner, A.C.I., editors]. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Gill, M. & Beever, D.E. (1982). The effect of protein supplementation on digestion and glucose metabolism in young cattle fed on silage. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 37–47.Google Scholar
Goering, H.K. & Van Soest, P.J. (1970). Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). ARS US Department of Agriculture Handbook no. 379. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ikwuegbu, O.A. & Sutton, J.D. (1982). The effect of varying the amount of linseed oil supplementation on rumen metabolism in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 365–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (1978). Alimentation des Ruminants. Versailles: INRA Publications.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T.C. & Palmquist, D.L. (1984). Effect of fatty acids or calcium soaps on rumen and total nutrient digestibility of dairy rations. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 978–986.Google Scholar
Low, A.G. & Rainbird, A.L. (1983). Effect of dietary fibre (guar gum) on endogenous nitrogen secretion in the jejunum of pigs. In IVth International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, vol. 2, pp. 343–346 [Arnal, M., Pion, R. and Bonin, D., editors]. Versailles: INRA.Google Scholar
McAllan, A.B., Knight, R. & Sutton, J.D. (1983). The effect of free and protected oils on the digestion of dietary carbohydrates between mouth and duodenum. British Journal of Nutrition 49, 433–440.Google Scholar
McAllan, A.B. & Smith, R.H. (1974). Carbohydrate metabolism in the ruminant. Bacterial carbohydrates formed in the rumen and their contribution to digesta entering the duodenum. British Journal of Nutrition 31, 77–88.Google Scholar
McAllan, A.B. & Smith, R.H. (1983). Factors influencing the digestion of dietary carbohydrates between the mouth and abomasum of steers. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 445–454.Google Scholar
MacRae, J.C. & Evans, C.C. (1974). The use of inert ruthenium-phenanthroline as a digesta particulate marker in sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 33, 10A–11A.Google Scholar
MacRae, J.C. & Lobley, G.E. (1986). Interactions between energy and protein. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 367–385 [Milligan, L.P., Grovum, W.L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
MacRae, J.C., Smith, J.S., Dewey, P.J.S., Brewer, A.C., Brown, D.S. & Walker, A. (1985). The efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy and apparent absorption of amino acids in sheep given spring and autumn-harvested dried grass. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J.C. & Ulyatt, M.J. (1974). Quantitative digestion of fresh herbage by sheep. II. The sites of digestion of some nitrogenous constituents. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V.C., Bech-Andersen, S. & Rudemo, M. (1980). Hydrolysate preparation for amino acid determinations in feed constituents. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 27, pp. 351–355 [Oslage, H.J. and Rohr, K., editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, J.R., Allen, S.A. & Miller, E.L. (1980). Rumen bacterial protein synthesis and the proportion of dietary protein escaping degradation in the rumen of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 43, 421–433.Google Scholar
Mulvany, P. (1981). Dairy cow condition scoring. National Institute for Research in Dairying Technical Leaflet paper no. 4468. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Oldham, J.D., Buttery, P.J., Swan, H. & Lewis, D. (1977). Interactions between dietary carbohydrate and nitrogen digestion in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 467–479.Google Scholar
Oldham, J.D. & Smith, T. (1981). Protein-energy interrelationships for growing and for lactating cattle. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation, pp. 103–130 [ Miller, E.L., Pike, I.H. and Van Es, A.J.H., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E.R. (1986). Starch digestion and utilization in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1624–1633.Google Scholar
Ortigues, I. (1987). Nutrient supply, growth and calorimetric efficiency in heifers offered straw rich diets. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Ortigues, I., Smith, T., Oldham, J.D., de Courtenay, M.B. & Siviter, J.W. (1986). Nutrient supply in growing cattle offered straw diets supplemented with barley or fishmeal. Animal Production 42, 437Google Scholar
Ortigues, I., Smith, T., Oldham, J.D. & Gill, M. (1989). The effects of fishmeal on growth and calorimetric efficiency in heifers offered straw-based diets. In Energy Metabolism, pp. 65–68 [Van der Honing, Y. and Close, W.H., editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Redman, R.G., Kellaway, R.C. & Leibholz, J. (1980). Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of urea and protein supplements of differing solubility on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating oaten chaff. British Journal of Nutrition 44, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robelin, J. & Daenicke, R. (1980). Variations of net requirements for cattle growth with liveweight, liveweight gain, breed and sex. Annales de Zootechnie 29, no. hors série, 99–118.Google Scholar
Rohr, K., Schafft, H. & Lebzien, P. (1983). Critical analysis of present protein allowances for growing ruminants. In IVth International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, vol. I, pp. 449–461 [Arnal, M., Pion, R. and Bonin, D., editors]. Versailles: INRA.Google Scholar
Rooke, J.A. & Armstrong, D.G. (1987). The digestion by cattle of silage and barley diets containing increasing quantities of fishmeal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddons, R.C., Paradine, J., Gale, D.L. & Evans, R.T. (1985). Estimation of the degradability of dietary protein in the sheep rumen by in vivo and in vitro procedures. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 545–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R.H. (1980). Comparative amino-acid requirements. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R.H. & McAllan, A.B. (1974). Some factors influencing the chemical composition of mixed rumen bacteria. British Journal of Nutrition 31, 27–34.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, V.J. & Hill, R.E. (1980 a). A comparison of sources of supplementary nitrogen for young cattle receiving fibre-rich diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 687–695.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, W.H. & Siviter, J.W. (1980 b). An assessment of barley straw and oat hulls as energy sources for yearling cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Grigera-Naon, J.J., Broster, W.H. & Siviter, J.W. (1983–1984). Ammonia versus sodium hydroxide treatment of straw for growing cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Ortigues, I., Broster, W.H., Siviter, J.W. & de Courtenay, M.B. (1985). Variation in the amount of food offered to yearling cattle. Animal Production 40, 534Google Scholar
Spragg, J.C., Kellaway, R.C. & Leibholz, J. (1986). Effects of supplements on intake, rumen function and nutrient supply and growth in cattle eating alkali-treated oat straw. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 487–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storm, E. & Ørskov, E.R. (1983). The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. I. Large scale isolation and chemical composition of rumen micro-organisms. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, J.D. (1980). Digestion and end-product formation in the rumen from production rations. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 271–290 [Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P., editors]. Westport, Connecticut: Avi Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J.D. & Johnson, V.W. (1969). Fermentation in the rumen of cows given rations containing hay and flaked maize or rolled barley in widely different proportions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 459–468.Google Scholar
Sutton, J.D., Storry, J.E. & Nicholson, J.W.G. (1970). The digestion of fatty acids in the stomach and intestines of sheep given widely different rations. Journal of Dairy Research 37, 97–105.Google Scholar
Ternrud, I.E. & Neergaard, L. (1986). Influence of sodium hydroxide pretreatment and starch content on apparent digestibilities of separate cell wall carbohydrates fed to sheep. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 56, 78–85.Google Scholar
Toullec, R., Guilloteau, P., Patureau-Mirand, P. & Sissons, J.W. (1983). Digestion and absorption of protein in the preruminant. In IVth International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, vol. 1, pp. 245 261 [Arnal, M., Pion, R. and Bonin, D., editors]. Versailles: INRA.Google Scholar
Webster, A.J.F., Kitcherside, M.A., Keirby, J.R. & Hall, P.A. (1984). Evaluation of protein foods for dairy cows. Animal Production 38, 548Google Scholar